People are free to believe whatever religion or theology they want. But it is not correct to project one's own beliefs onto others. Especially if the belief is not even ethical (Animals were NOT created to serve humans, for example) Calling this out is not an attack.
Agreed people are free to believe whatever religion or theology they wish. No projection or imposition attempted here. Just result of findings on interviewing a few samples. Need not be conclusive. But an apparent end towards which current trend is tending towards.
Whatever the creator created animals for being, man has tamed and used them for his benefit. The milk that men drink, using for coffee and tea, is not mother's milk, is it?
Don't bullock-carts and horse-driven carts, reindeer driven sledges exist? Ain't dogs used as squad to sniff and trace thieves? Ain't animals caged in Zoos?
Whatever religion you are following, perhaps hinduism, is it your own internal conviction or an external compulsion, an external conditioning of your mind?
Is it your own personal choice, self-will or is it mandated by your birth, imposed on you from external agents, may be your parents? Is it mere meek submission and subscription to the mandate by your parents to follow their religion, regardless of and irrespective of your conviction? Even before you were born, from wherever you were, did you conduct any research, discover at the end that the religion you are born into is the best and hence choose to be born in that religion?
Is it by virtue of YOUR birth in that religion, the religion you are waxing eloquent as great, great?
Had you been born in a group which do not worship animals, would you have founded out worshipping animals is indeed worth and breaking all rules of that religion, would you have worshipped whichever animal you are worshipping now? For instance, had you been born a muslim or christian or sikh or jain, would you have worshipped hanuman or ganesh?
Whatever religion or theology you believe (or claim to be believing), is your belief objective or subjective, is your belief absolute or relative?
Please do not answer me. Answer to your own conscience.
Now coming to the point of this thread, why is a person free to choose religion or theology but a TB is not free to choose his of her life partner? Why should his or her choice be dictated or governed by so-called-TB-culture, by horoscope matching, by his parents' likes and dislikes, by the likes and dislikes of his or her TB community ethos, conditions, customs, traditions etc? If you can provide a convincing explanation, I will agree with you that a TB must marry only a TB.