Will J. Jayalalithaa emerge victorious in the appeal verdict on 11th May

[vgane]

Share:

Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp Email Share Link

JJ likely to take oath on 23rd as per this snippet!

Danger for 9 TN ministers | ???????????? ??., ??????????? ?????? ????????????? ???????? ?????? | Dinamalar

 

[vgane]

JJ send senior minister to meet Sonia to prevent any appeal being filed by Karnataka!

அ.தி.மு.க.,வைச் சேர்ந்த முன்னாள் மத்திய அமைச்சரும், சீனியர் எம்.பி.,யுமான ஒருவர், காங்கிரஸ் தலைவர் சோனியாவை சந்தித்து, இது தொடர்பாக பேசியுள்ளார். 'கர்நாடக காங்கிரஸ் அரசுக்கு அழுத்தம் கொடுக்கும், தமிழக எதிர்க்கட்சிகளின் கோரிக்கையை ஏற்க வேண்டாம்' என கேட்டுக் கொண்டு உள்ளார்.தமிழகத்தில் கூட்டணி விஷயத்தில், அ.தி.மு.க., எந்த இறுதி முடிவும் எடுக்கவில்லை என்றும், பா.ஜ.,வுடன் கூட்டணி என்பது தவறான தகவல் என்றும், சோனியாவிடம் தெளிவுபடுத்தி உள்ளனர்.மேலும், லோக்சபாவில், 37 எம்.பி.,க்களும், ராஜ்யசபாவில், 11 எம்.பி.,க்களும் கொண்ட கட்சி என்பதால், அ.தி.மு.க.,வின் உதவி, பிரதான எதிர்க்கட்சியான காங்கிரசுக்கு தேவைப்படுவதையும், அவர் சுட்டிக்காட்டி உள்ளார். இதனால், மேல்முறையீட்டுக்கு கர்நாடக அரசு செல்லாது என, எதிர்பார்க்கிறோம். இவ்வாறு, அ.தி.மு.க., வட்டாரத்தில் தெரிவிக்கப்படுகிறது.

Sourceinamalar

 

[sarang]

It is funny. Case was shifted to karnataka because tamilnadu govt may influence the trial and witnesses. Prosecution is enforcement directorate and not karnataka government, though it is providing infrastructure and facilities. Now it has asked TN govt to reimburse expenses incurred.

 

[vgane]

Look at what Thamizhisai who is State BJP President has to say ..BJP has no relation with Dr Swamy's views on appeal

 

[mkrishna100]

JJ send senior minister to meet Sonia to prevent any appeal being filed by Karnataka!

I do not know how far this information is true but if it is true then it means Jaya is doing the same what Karuna did when he was cornered by the Sarkaria Commission i.e falling at the feet of the then PM Indira Gandhi to save his skin .But here even if she takes Congress help in seeing to it that Karnataka Govt does not go in for an appeal then it will anger BJP who will give a green signal to Subramania Swamy to proceed further and angering the BJP is not good for her at this moment . Best for her is to take the fight to the Supreme Court and see a finality of this issue .

 

[mkrishna100]

Look at what Thamizhisai who is State BJP President has to say ..BJP has no relation with Dr Swamy's views on appeal

Dr.Swamy filed this case much before he was part of BJP and hence he cant just drop it .

 

[V.Balasubramani]

Best for her is to take the fight to the Supreme Court and see a finality of this issue .

That may prove a long drawn battle again but this time by the appellants.

 

[V.Balasubramani]

JJ send senior minister to meet Sonia to prevent any appeal being filed by Karnataka!

அ.தி.மு.க.,வைச் சேர்ந்த முன்னாள் மத்திய அமைச்சரும், சீனியர் எம்.பி.,யுமான ஒருவர், காங்கிரஸ் தலைவர் சோனியாவை சந்தித்து, இது தொடர்பாக பேசியுள்ளார். 'கர்நாடக காங்கிரஸ் அரசுக்கு அழுத்தம் கொடுக்கும், தமிழக எதிர்க்கட்சிகளின் கோரிக்கையை ஏற்க வேண்டாம்' என கேட்டுக் கொண்டு உள்ளார்.தமிழகத்தில் கூட்டணி விஷயத்தில், அ.தி.மு.க., எந்த இறுதி முடிவும் எடுக்கவில்லை என்றும், பா.ஜ.,வுடன் கூட்டணி என்பது தவறான தகவல் என்றும், சோனியாவிடம் தெளிவுபடுத்தி உள்ளனர்.மேலும், லோக்சபாவில், 37 எம்.பி.,க்களும், ராஜ்யசபாவில், 11 எம்.பி.,க்களும் கொண்ட கட்சி என்பதால், அ.தி.மு.க.,வின் உதவி, பிரதான எதிர்க்கட்சியான காங்கிரசுக்கு தேவைப்படுவதையும், அவர் சுட்டிக்காட்டி உள்ளார். இதனால், மேல்முறையீட்டுக்கு கர்நாடக அரசு செல்லாது என, எதிர்பார்க்கிறோம். இவ்வாறு, அ.தி.மு.க., வட்டாரத்தில் தெரிவிக்கப்படுகிறது.

Sourceinamalar

In Tamil Nadu, EVKS Elangovan is presently very vigorously spearheading a campaign against the prevailing rampant corruption by the ruling AIADMK Government. Will he be silenced then??

 

[mkrishna100]

In Tamil Nadu, EVKS Elangovan is presently very vigorously spearheading a campaign against the prevailing rampant corruption by the ruling AIADMK Government. Will he be silenced then??

'
He will if his high command says so but then TN unit of BJP will take up the war agaisnt AIADMK from where Elangovan left . It will be a very big comedy then .

 

[mkrishna100]

This is the latest tweet from Dr.Subramania Swamy regarding JJ Case

I have decided to file SLP in SC after June 1st if Ktaka govt does not file. So no need to go to KHC

 

[sarang]

The criticism from all quarter is about the method of calculation. If it is true, can the Judge go for revision in his judgement?

This is from a tv panel discussion. Interesting.

நீதிபதி ஊழல் தடுப்பு சட்டத்தில் வழக்கு தொடர்ந்த்தே தவறு என அடிப்படை
குற்றசாட்டையே நிராகரித்து விட்டதார் எனவே கணக்கு வழக்கு பற்றிய குறைகளை
எடுபடாது அப்படியே அப்பீல் மனுவை விசாரணை க்கு உச்சநீதிமன்றம் ஏற்றாலும்
கூட நீதிபதி குமாரசாமி அவர்கள் பல்வேறு நிறுவணங்கள பெற்ற கடன்களில் தேசிய
உடமையாக்கப்பட்ட வங்கிகளின் கடனை மற்றும் தான் ஏற்று கொள்வதாக
அறிவித்தார் (இங்கே தான் calculation error உள்ளதாக அரசியல் வாதிகளால்
பிரதானமாக சுட்டிகாட்டப் பட்டுள்ளது )

ஆனால் அவர் தனியார் வங்கிகளில் இருந்து பெறப்பட்ட 14 கோடி கடனை ஏற்ற
மறுத்து விட்டார் இதை கூட ஜெயலலிதா தரப்பில் உச்சநீதிமன்றம் அப்பீல்
விசாரணை போது ஏற்றுக்கொள்ள கோரிக்கை வைத்தால் அதை உச்சநீதிமன்றம்
ஏற்றுக்கொள்ள வாய்ப்புகள் உள்ளன (ஏற்கனவே இது போன்ற பல வழக்குகளில்
உச்சநீதிமன்றம் தனியார் வங்கிகளில் கடனை ஆவன அடிப்படை யில் ஏற்று
கொண்டுள்ளது,

இந்த வழக்கு ஒரு வேளை விசாரணைக்கு ஏற்று கொள்ளப்பட்டாலும் அந்த
நீதிமன்ற நடவடிக்கைகள் தொடங்கவே பல மாதங்கள் ஆகுமாம் காரணம் இது விடுதலை
யை எதிர்த்து மேல் முறையீடு (its a appeal against aquittance not a appeal against conviction ) இரண்டிற்கும் வேறுபாடுகள் உள்ளன -

 

[V.Balasubramani]

கர்நாடக ஐகோர்ட்டு தீர்ப்பை எதிர்த்து மேல்முறையீடு: அரசு வக்கீல் ஆச்சார்யாவுக்கு சட்டத்துறை செயலாளர் கடிதம்

பெங்களூர், மே. 14–
கர்நாடக ஐகோர்ட்டு தீர்ப்பை எதிர்த்து மேல் முறையீடு செய்வது பற்றி கருத்து கேட்டு அரசு வக்கீல் ஆச்சார்யாவுக்கு சட்டத்துறை செயலாளர் கடிதம் எழுதியுள்ளார்.

சொத்து குவிப்பு வழக்கில் ஜெயலலிதா உள்ளிட்ட 4 பேருக்கு விதிக்கப்பட்ட 4 ஆண்டு ஜெயில் தண்டனையை கர்நாடக ஐகோர்ட்டு தனி நீதிபதி குமாரசாமி ரத்து செய்து தீர்ப்பு கூறினார்.

தீர்ப்பு குறித்து கருத்து தெரிவித்த அரசு வக்கீல் ஆச்சார்யா, தனக்கு வழக்கில் வாதாட வாய்ப்பு வழங்கப்படவில்லை. இந்த தீர்ப்பு தனக்கு அதிர்ச்சி அளிப்பதாகவும், தீர்ப்பை எதிர்த்து சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டில் அப்பீல் செய்ய கர்நாடக அரசை வலியுறுத்துவேன் என்றும் கூறியிருந்தார்.

இது போல் தமிழக எதிர்க்கட்சி தலைவர்களும் ஜெயலலிதா விடுதலையை எதிர்த்து சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டில் அப்பீல் செய்ய வேண்டும் என்று வலியுறுத்தி வருகிறார்கள்.

Read more at: ??????? ????????? ???????? ????????? ????????????: ???? ??????? ??????????????? ?????????? ???????? ?????? || Karnataka High Court appeal against the judgment legislative secretary to the prosecutors letter Acharya

 

[prasad1]

[h=1]Modi's candid chat with Jaya[/h]13 May 2015, 0803 hrs IST

 

[mkrishna100]

[h=5]Clouds Gather Over Jaya Verdict[/h]
Prosecution points out more errors in the Karnataka High Court order acquitting Jayalalithaa in a corruption case
by

Sandhya Ravishankar (is a journalist based in Chennai)​

Clouds Gather Over Jaya Verdict | Swarajya
The case could well go down in the history of Indian jurisprudence as the first case tried without a valid prosecution in place—where bail for the convicted as well as the entire appeal process in the appellate court took place without a public prosecutor. A convoluted, protracted legal battle which took 18 long years to reach conclusion was overturned in a matter of months by the Karnataka High Court. And the legal fraternity is visibly astounded.
“It is a black day for the Indian judiciary,” said senior Supreme Court lawyer and anti-corruption activist Prashant Bhushan on May 11, when the verdict was delivered. Speaking to Swarajya, Bhushan explained his stand. “Conviction of powerful people is rarely obtained,” he said. “Whenever the trial court gives such a judgement, it should be taken seriously. A detailed judgement has been given by the trial court and for it to be overturned like this is sad.”
The High Court verdict acquitting former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa runs to 919 pages. The prosecution says that there are several issues with this judgement—from glaring errors of arithmetic to overlooking of crucial facts.
[h=3]Absent Prosecution[/h]Prashant Bhushan flags of the first and most crucial aspect of the case—that of a lack of prosecution. “The prosecution has not been given an opportunity to say anything in this case,” he told Swarajya. “It is a virtually one-sided hearing.”
Why was there no prosecution? The answer dates back to October 2014, when a convicted Jayalalithaa approached the Supreme Court for bail. There was no prosecutor present. One day before the court went on Diwali vacations, a bench led by the Chief Justice of India H.L. Dattu heard the bail petition out of turn and granted bail. The SC also directed the Karnataka High Court to complete the appeal process in three months from the start of hearing.
“The prosecution, which was the state of Karnataka, was not consulted as to whether they would be prepared or not,” said a senior lawyer on condition of anonymity. “In fact there was no prosecutor at the bail hearing, only the defendants were heard.”
Jaya’s appeal hearing in the High Court began as per the SC’s directions in January 2015. But the prosecutor appearing in court was Bhavani Singh, appointed by Tamil Nadu’s Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) and not appointed by the Karnataka state government. The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam’s (DMK) General Secretary Anbazhagan, who had impleaded himself in the case, went to the apex court demanding the removal of Bhavani Singh on various counts. The Karnataka High Court continued hearing the appeal during this time.
In late April 2015, a three-judge bench struck down the appointment of Bhavani Singh by the DVAC, terming it “bad in law”. Ruling out a re-hearing, the bench directed the Karnataka government to hand over written submissions to Judge Kumaraswamy. The High Court was asked to ignore Bhavani Singh’s arguments and to rely on the written submissions of the DMK and the Karnataka government instead. The Karnataka government appointed B.V. Acharya as the special public prosecutor—he was given a day’s time to make his submissions.
“There is serious prejudice against the prosecution,” said Acharya on May 11. “Even for the written submission, we were given one day, which was not sufficient. The state of Karnataka has been prejudiced in conduct before the court.”
“Acharya’s views have been submitted to the court by way of written submission as directed by the Supreme Court,” said a senior AIADMK leader who did not wish to be named. “These are all matters that are within judicial jurisdiction. A special public prosecutor is not expected to debate this matter publicly, he is not a public figure. He has to take it up only with the courts.”
[h=3]Arithmetic error[/h]A simple miscalculation in the HC order could turn out to be crucial for the prosecution in case of an appeal. Page 852 of the order contains an arithmetic error—the total income in terms of loans taken by Jaya and co-accused, is shown to be excess by Rs 13.5 crore. Upon further calculation using the right total, the basis of the acquittal could well be turned upon its head.
“There are arithmetic errors in the order,” said Acharya on Tuesday. “The court has calculated the proportion of unexplained wealth at 8.12% but the actual tally comes to 76.7%,” he said.
The High Court had cited various judgements to acquit all four accused, stating that their proportion of unexplained wealth to their known sources of income is within 10%, which is permissible by law. This arithmetic error could well change the game.
“If we peruse the entire 919 pages, it will bring to light a loan amount of Rs 13 crore taken from the deposit of Namadhu MGR,” said the AIADMK senior leader. “This is a typographical error which has not reflected in the tabular column.”
[h=3]Repaid Loans[/h]Another error which has been pointed out by the prosecution is that the HC order considers several repaid loans as income. Page 848 of the order states: “Though it is contended by learned Senior Counsel that income of Accused is Rs.9,34,26,053.56/-, but from the evidence available and material on record, it is crystal clear that Accused Nos. 1 to 4, firms and companies have borrowed loans to the tune of Rs.24,17,31,274/-. Such being the case, this amount has lost sight of by the prosecution. The Investigating Agency has also not investigated in this regard.” Page 852 has a list of loans which have been considered as income.
But in the trial court order, the tabular column on Page 294 clearly shows that one loan worth Rs 1.5 crore has been repaid in total. The order says: “Amount paid towards interest in respect of the loan of Rs.1,50,00,000/- availed by M/s. Jaya Publications from Indian Bank, Abirampuram, whileclosing the loan accounton 25.06.1994 (Apart from the principal amount of Rs.1,50,00,000/-)”. At least one other loan too has been repaid – “Repayment of Loan availed by M/s. Sasi Enterprises from Indian Bank, Abirampuram Rs.11,44,977.00 (P) Rs. 6,87,706.00 (I) = Rs.18,32,683.00.”
“How can repaid loans be taken into account as income?” asked A. Saravanan, lawyer for the DMK’s Anbazhagan. “It is not just loans being treated as income, several immovable properties have not been taken into account at all by the High Court. For instance, the Kodanad estate worth about Rs 7.5 crore doesn’t feature at all.”
The AIADMK told Swarajya they were studying this aspect and did not wish to comment just yet.
[h=3]Reliance on IT returns[/h]Sharp criticism is coming in of the High Court’s heavy reliance on Income tax returns of Jaya and others to accept their claims of income. Trial court judge Michael Cunha had categorically refused to rely on IT returns since the quality of income is more important than the quantity of income—the source of the income is more important than the declared value.
But the High Court has almost fully relied on IT returns filed by all four accused and companies as is evident in Page 907 – “Just because Accused No.1 was Chief Minister at that time, we cannot saddle all the marriage expenses on her part. Relying on income tax returns towards expenditure of marriage, I consider that she has spent about Rs.28,68,000/-.”
Legal experts point out that there are a number of precedents which show that IT returns cannot be relied upon as evidence of income. The Lalu Prasad case as well as a 1999 case of Nallammal vs State of Tamil Nadu state as much. A more recent example is that of State of Tamil Nadu vs Suresh Rajan in 2014, where the court observed that paying income tax does not legitimize income and that it is necessary to establish legitimate source of the income.
“In a number of instances, IT returns have been filed later by the four accused,” said Saravanan. “But these too have been accepted by the court.”
This can be seen in Page 875-876 where the HC order states: “When Income Tax returns have not been filed for many years, it disentitles the assessee substantially. A doubt arises in the genuineness of the Income tax returns. But when it is produced before the Income Tax department after a long time and is not produced when its production was warranted, it is a suspicious circumstance against the genuineness of the claim of the assessee in respect of this subscription item i.e. Namadhu MGR.”
Despite this, the court goes on to accept Rs 4 crore as income earned by Jaya Publications in this specific instance.
The AIADMK disagrees. “The decision taken by the Income Tax department which is under a duly enacted IT law is final,” said the AIADMK leader. “So there is nothing wrong with relying on IT returns.”
[h=3]Namadhu MGR: Party cadre testimony allowed[/h]One of the key defence arguments allowed by the High Court is with respect to the subscription scheme of Namadhu MGR, an AIADMK party mouthpiece. The trial court order clearly states in pages 232-233 that the applications for the Namadhu MGR scheme submitted as evidence by the defence are bogus. “…a bare perusal of these applications indicate that, these applications have been created just before the examination of the witnesses some where in 2012 and manouvered to be produced before the Court. Even the naked eye of a common ordinary man could find out that the entire bulk of applications produced before this Court are nothing but sheets of paper kept in sunlight or exposed to smoke so as to give them an appearance of old used papers, but the ink used on the said sheets for writing the names and other details appears to be so fresh and recent belying the very claim of the accused that the said applications were obtained during the check period.”
The High Court has taken the testimonies of defence witnesses, admittedly AIADMK cadre, into account and has accepted a sum of Rs 4 crore as legitimate income. On Page 876 of the HC order is stated: “Taking into consideration of the evidence of defence witnesses mentioned hereinabove, even if there is a delay in filing the Income Tax returns, this cannot be a factor to reject the whole claim of the assessee. The evidence adduced by the defence will have some force.”
“Namadhu MGR subscribers have paid the money as deposits and these are being paid back by way of newspapers,” said the AIADMK leader. “So the deposits become the total assets of Namadhu MGR itself. Namadhu MGRdoes not need to return the money to subscribers. Only if newspapers are not given to subscribers, it can be questioned,” he said.
[h=3]Birthday gifts allowed[/h]The Karnataka HC has accepted Rs 1.5 crore worth of birthday gifts in the form of a gold sword and other items as legitimate income and discounted these as disproportionate assets. Out of this sum of Rs 1.5 crore, Rs 77 lakh of foreign remittance too has been accepted as legitimate by the High Court as it has been declared in Jaya’s income tax returns.
“This is a dangerous move,” said a senior journalist who did not wish to be named. “This now means that any politician can be bribed using gifts and jewellery rather than by giving cash and the courts will allow this to happen in the future. That is what this judgement is practically saying,” he said.
“It is an accepted precedent,” said the AIADMK leader.
[h=3]Construction costs slashed[/h]Costs of construction and renovation of various properties belonging to the four accused as well as other companies in their name have been slashed by the Karnataka High Court as overvalued. On Pages 760-761, the HC states that rates of materials and construction as prescribed by the Public Works Department (PWD) of the Tamil Nadu government cannot be used as they are too high. “No prudent man will pay the cost of PWD rates for construction. PWD rates include delay in payment, miscellaneous expenditure of the contractor and also interest on the borrowed amount if any by the contractor. Therefore, PWD rate will normally higher than the rate that will be done by the contractor.”
“It is a government rate, the only real rate that can be accepted in a court of law,” opined the senior journalist. “To not accept the government rate is rather unusual.”
“The PWD rate is an inflated rate,” said the AIADMK leader. “The rates that they have given is in fact 300% more than the rates in the retail market. For example the square feet rate of marble when purchased in bulk is Rs 100. Even today the rate is only Rs 200 if you book it from Rajasthan through agents in Chennai itself. But the rate assessed by the PWD is Rs 1800 per square feet. This is 18 times more than the real rate,” he argued.
[h=3]Rental income[/h]Page 883 of the HC order states simply that “It is the contention of learned Counsel for the Appellant that the rental income has been omitted by the prosecution i.e., Rs.3,22,000/-. This amount is added to the income.”
DMK lawyer Saravanan says this is highly unusual. “That’s it, there is no explanation about why this income is taken into consideration,” he said. “The court should have given a detailed reasoning as to why this rental income is being taken into consideration when the trial court has dismissed it.”
“When prosecution itself has omitted the rental amount, then it has to be added, isn’t it?” said the AIADMK leader.
[h=3]Will Karnataka appeal?[/h]That is the question on the minds of everyone from Jaya’s team, the DMK as well as most other political parties in Tamil Nadu.
DMK chief M Karunanidhi said on Tuesday that the DMK would support the Karnataka government in an appeal to the Supreme Court.
Representatives of S Ramadoss’ Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) met Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Wednesday and handed over a letter of appeal to him. “We strongly believe that the Karnataka government should immediately initiate the appeal process and obtain stay of the order before any further damage is done… Justice is being sought to be massacred. Kindly act immediately,” said the letter.
Left parties, Vijaykanth’s DMDK (Desiya Murpokku Dravidar Kazhagam) as well as the Tamil Nadu Congress have all demanded that the judgement be reviewed. They have appealed to the Karnataka government to move the Supreme Court.
Sources within the Karnataka Law Ministry told Swarajya that the legal options are under discussion and that a decision on appealing in the Supreme Court would be taken within three days.
As for Jaya, she continues to be ensconced inside her Poes Garden residence, holding discussions with Chief Minister O Panneerselvam and other cabinet ministers. A game of wait and watch appears to be on in the AIADMK camp. “I do not wish to comment on our next move,” said the AIADMK leader.
The ball is now firmly in the Karnataka government’s court.

 

[Jaykay767]

100s of Millions are dying of poverty, Hunger, preventable diseases due to lack of healthcare, etc.. Govt & all the national resources in the media, public, etc.. are better served if we focus on development that can uplift these millions – instead of focusing &analyzing things like # of Sarees, Construction costs, marriage expenses, birthday gifts, etc…

 

[tbs]

hi

see the new problem in the case........from dinamani....


???????? ?????? ???????????.. ???????? ??????? ????????: ??????????? ????????? - Dinamani - Tamil Daily News

 

[biswa]

100s of Millions are dying of poverty, Hunger, preventable diseases due to lack of healthcare, etc.. Govt & all the national resources in the media, public, etc.. are better served if we focus on development that can uplift these millions – instead of focusing &analyzing things like # of Sarees, Construction costs, marriage expenses, birthday gifts, etc…

How will millions be uplifted from poverty if money is being stolen by politicans? That is why the corrupt need to be prosecuted and convicted.

 

[prasad1]

How will millions be uplifted from poverty if money is being stolen by politicans? That is why the corrupt need to be prosecuted and convicted.

The law is to be selectively applied. If a poor person steals even Rs 100.00 then he should be sent to jail, but if the politician is from my party that politician should be exonerated. I do not know what is this logic.

 

[V.Balasubramani]

How will millions be uplifted from poverty if money is being stolen by politicans? That is why the corrupt need to be prosecuted and convicted.

Well said Sir,

Most of the public exercise their franchise in favour of a particular political party with good hope that things will improve. (I am talking about the general public who voted without accepting any benefit for their vote).

But these Dravidian Parties once come to power, they start swindling the government, lured to corrupt practice, involve in all misdeeds and malpractices thus accumulate wealth. Interest of serving the general public is pushed to the back seat and personal interest is dominant.

Now most of the card holders are offered 20 kgs of rice at free of cost every month which indicate that there are still general public who are unable to offered to buy rice for their day-to-day living.

On the contrary, attractive revenue is earned through marketing IMFL Products through innumerable TASMAC outlets all over Tamil Nadu.

And the revenue spent on TASMAC by the Government, indirectly goes to those who owns these companies that supply their products to TASMAC.

Who are all these owners?
How are they connected with the Political parties?
What is the link, yardstick, norms, adopted to award the contract?

There are Government Hospitals functioning without Doctors, There are Government Hospitals without lifesaving medicines, (I read on the other day in one Hospital there is no medicine to treat rabies).

There are schools without Teachers.

There are general public without food!

There are Parties which don't have time to think about all these poor things but spend all the time mudslinging each other.

But there are theatres with ‘Houseful’ Show….

One should see that crowd that gathered at T.Nagar on the day of launching the first Jewelry Show Room by a reputed brand with their brand ambassadors, mega cine Stars drawn from different States. These fans assembled not to purchase their product, but to have a glimpse at their favorite Heroes/Heroines. It is reported in the news that these Cine Stars are over joyed looking out at the massive turn out!

In Tamil Nadu, Government will be ruled only by a Party leader who is well connected with Cinema field.


Just my two cents.

 

[V.Balasubramani]

The law is to be selectively applied. If a poor person steals even Rs 100.00 then he should be sent to jail, but if the politician is from my party that politician should be exonerated. I do not know what is this logic.

This case relates to acquiring assets disproportionately through known sources of income to the tune of Rs.66 crores.

But the amount so far spent on conducting this particular case alone for the last 18 years is around 220 crores which is nothing but public money.

Now one member comes here and talks about 100 millions are dying of poverty, hunger, preventable disease, lack of health case.etc.


And everyone is silent about this 220 crores why

 

[vgane]

JJ has called her MLA's meeting on 22nd May...Let us see what is being finalized


http://www.dinamani.com/latest_news/2015/05/15/வரும்-22ம்-தேதி-அதிமுக-சட்டப்-/article2815555.ece

 

[V.Balasubramani]

JJ has called her MLA's meeting on 22nd May...Let us see what is being finalized


????? 22?? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ????????????? ??????? : ???????? ????????? - Dinamani - Tamil Daily News

Sir,

JJ will assume charge.

Either Karnataka or Dr. Subramania Swamy will approach the SC with an appeal.

It will take another 10-15 years to get the verdict.

There will be a sensational case tomorrow drawing everyone’s attention as usual exaggerated by the media.

General public will forget all these ……. go along with their life routine.

‘Chelta hai’. This is the attitude of general public.

Tamil Nadu will have General Election in 2016.

 

[mkrishna100]

JJ will assume charge.

Nothing legally prevents JJ from assuming charge now and the question how long she can continue will depend upon how long the Supreme Court takes to give verdict in this issue . However much people can shout over this mathematical blunder the judgement as it is cannot be revised by the Bangalore High Court and can be rectified/revised/approved only by the Supreme Court and till then legally JJ can assume charge once again as the Tamil Nadu CM .

 

[V.Balasubramani]

Nothing legally prevents JJ from assuming charge now and the question how long she can continue will depend upon how long the Supreme Court takes to give verdict in this issue . However much people can shout over this mathematical blunder the judgement as it is cannot be revised by the Bangalore High Court and can be rectified/revised/approved only by the Supreme Court and till then legally JJ can assume charge once again as the Tamil Nadu CM .

You are right.

Every time general public vote JJ to power with a big hope and it is the power of democracy that prevails.

மக்கள் தீர்ப்பே மகேசன் தீர்ப்பு.

 

[V.Balasubramani]

The question raised in the thread is "Will J.Jayalalitha emerge victorious in the appeal verdict on 11th May."

She now emerged victorious.

Thanks to Judge Kumaraswamy.

Image source: face book