It is truly amazing how Madam இராஜி இராம் has managed so slickly to turn this thread about "true anecdotes and episodes in someone's real life (he also has a false life?)" into an orgy of enthusiastic Kerala-Brahmin bashing.
And the moderators seem to be doing nothing about it.
Earlier, I had remarked in this thread:-
Some people regrettably can be advertently or inadvertently blind and, unfortunately, culturally biased, importing their own apparent prejudices into their posts. They jump to conclusions reflecting their pre-conceived notions of the world and its inhabitants.
This apparently proved to be prophetic.
Madam இராஜி இராம் seems to have managed to draw a following to echo her divisive Kerala-Brahmana-bashing crusade.
If a one-year-old child from USA reportedly makes objectionable remarks in English about a Hindu temple's kumbha-abhishegam and highlights the "diapers" (prescribed traditional pancha-gachcham, utthareeyam and yoga-vasthram atttire) that the Braahmana priests are wearing -- that is cute, that is only a childish prank, it is childish innocence, it is to be applauded, enjoyed.
However, if an inquisitive eight-year-old child born to Tamil-Brahmin parents is taken to witness a Roman Catholic wedding in a USA church and puts embarrassing questions to his mother, "The stuff is not at all believable,"
This despite my having earlier written:-
(The eight-year-old child) was alert, and was genuinely shocked by what was going on in a Roman Catholic church in its parents' country of adoption.
And, of course, after muddying the waters and sowing discord, Madam இராஜி இராம் wants to have the last say and shut others up.
She says, "Dear Renu Let peace prevail."
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
I don't have anything more to say. So let me read in peace Guru Sir's posts, in this thread.
It is truly amazing how Madam இராஜி இராம் has managed so slickly to turn this thread about "true anecdotes and episodes in someone's real life (he also has a false life?)" into an orgy of enthusiastic Kerala-Brahmin bashing.
And the moderators seem to be doing nothing about it.
Earlier, I had remarked in this thread:-
Some people regrettably can be advertently or inadvertently blind and, unfortunately, culturally biased, importing their own apparent prejudices into their posts. They jump to conclusions reflecting their pre-conceived notions of the world and its inhabitants.
This apparently proved to be prophetic.
Madam இராஜி இராம் seems to have managed to draw a following to echo her divisive Kerala-Brahmana-bashing crusade.
If a one-year-old child from USA reportedly makes objectionable remarks in English about a Hindu temple's kumbha-abhishegam and highlights the "diapers" (prescribed traditional pancha-gachcham, utthareeyam and yoga-vasthram atttire) that the Braahmana priests are wearing -- that is cute, that is only a childish prank, it is childish innocence, it is to be applauded, enjoyed.
However, if an inquisitive eight-year-old child born to Tamil-Brahmin parents is taken to witness a Roman Catholic wedding in a USA church and puts embarrassing questions to his mother, "The stuff is not at all believable,"
This despite my having earlier written:-
(The eight-year-old child) was alert, and was genuinely shocked by what was going on in a Roman Catholic church in its parents' country of adoption.
And, of course, after muddying the waters and sowing discord, Madam இராஜி இராம் wants to have the last say and shut others up.
She says, "Dear Renu Let peace prevail."
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
Everyone can see how you are falsely accusing RR ji and Guru Ji of crimes that you imagined..... cant wait to see the conclusion of your trial. -- Srimathi Doctor இரேணுகா யுத்தக்கள வெற்றிவீரர்
Against such utterly closed minds, against such utterly prejudiced individuals, can doubt, reason or truth ever prevail?
"My trial" -- on what (trumped-up?) charges?
That I "imagined" the "one-year-old diaper-boy" fictitious fairy-tale recited by Mgurus on this thread?
That I tried to unmask the fiction?
That I "imagined" the persistent anti-Kerala-Brahmin rhetoric and sectarian-bashing of another female யுத்தக்கள வெற்றிவீரர் on this thread?
That I took her to task on this?
That I related the true tale of the inquisitive 8-year-old Brahmachaari and his eager questions to his mother at a Roman Catholic wedding in a USA church?
And will the prosecutor, jury, witness, judge and executioner all rolled into one in this farce be none other than our lovable and redoubtable
Srimathi Doctor இரேணுகா யுத்தக்கள வெற்றிவீரர் ?
As a prejudiced adjudicator pursuing a persecution, not prosecution, does she have any locus standi (her own oft-repeated phrase)?
S Narayanaswamy Iyer