This is a question in the minds of so many true and loyal Hindus.
1. Why the state machinery should interfere with the administration of
Hindu establishments alone, while it adopts a laissez faire policy
insofar as the other religious establishments?
2. Whether a government, which calls itself secular, is legally entitled
to and morally right in taking over the administration of Hindu
establishments?
3. What the government has done to retrieve the invaluable
assets owned by the temples, but encroached upon or illegally
taken possession of by third parties?
4. Why the non-believers and those who are openly opposed to
Hinduism, its philosophies and objectives are appointed on the
boards of trustees governing the temples?
5. In what way, the government is right in diverting huge surplus
income of many big temples to other unrelated, non-Hindu
causes? Can they do the same with other religions?
6. What the government has done to maintain, repair and renovate
ancient but poor temples, in terms of their individual income?
7. Why the archakas and other temple servants of a large number
of temples live in penury and is not the government responsible
for their pitiable plight?
8. While the state government employees are pampered, beyond
an acceptable level, why discrimination against the HRCE
workers, whose department is also a major money spinner for
the government?
9. When the government is seriously involved in temple
administration, how come the political bosses ruling the state
openly criticise, mock at and belittle Hinduism and Hindus?
10. Is there any legal remedy to extricate the temples from the
clutches of the government?
I invite our members to pour out their heart freely and after collecting important, pertinent and legally tenable arguments, we
may think of compiling them and then submitting a mass memoranda to all the constitutional authorities and also, take the issue to the courts and fight it out.
1. Why the state machinery should interfere with the administration of
Hindu establishments alone, while it adopts a laissez faire policy
insofar as the other religious establishments?
2. Whether a government, which calls itself secular, is legally entitled
to and morally right in taking over the administration of Hindu
establishments?
3. What the government has done to retrieve the invaluable
assets owned by the temples, but encroached upon or illegally
taken possession of by third parties?
4. Why the non-believers and those who are openly opposed to
Hinduism, its philosophies and objectives are appointed on the
boards of trustees governing the temples?
5. In what way, the government is right in diverting huge surplus
income of many big temples to other unrelated, non-Hindu
causes? Can they do the same with other religions?
6. What the government has done to maintain, repair and renovate
ancient but poor temples, in terms of their individual income?
7. Why the archakas and other temple servants of a large number
of temples live in penury and is not the government responsible
for their pitiable plight?
8. While the state government employees are pampered, beyond
an acceptable level, why discrimination against the HRCE
workers, whose department is also a major money spinner for
the government?
9. When the government is seriously involved in temple
administration, how come the political bosses ruling the state
openly criticise, mock at and belittle Hinduism and Hindus?
10. Is there any legal remedy to extricate the temples from the
clutches of the government?
I invite our members to pour out their heart freely and after collecting important, pertinent and legally tenable arguments, we
may think of compiling them and then submitting a mass memoranda to all the constitutional authorities and also, take the issue to the courts and fight it out.