• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Donald Trump's Presidency

Status
Not open for further replies.
I met a few Indian folks working in US from Georgia state that is currently Republican though traditionally Democratic...There is a big movement going on in US against the Republicans who voted for Trump..If you announce in public that you are a supporter of GOP there is a good chance of you being thrashed..Not sure if it is an exaggeration or reality..Pretty scary!!
The Democrats are in disarray. It will take very long time for the Republican majority to give up power. The liberals can shout and protest as much as they want, they can not change the ground reality.

There are a lot of PIO republican who support Trump. So your friends are exaggerating. But it is scary all the same.
 
I met a few Indian folks working in US from Georgia state that is currently Republican though traditionally Democratic...There is a big movement going on in US against the Republicans who voted for Trump..If you announce in public that you are a supporter of GOP there is a good chance of you being thrashed..Not sure if it is an exaggeration or reality..Pretty scary!!

There are activist liberal who are now storming town hall meetings by US Congressional representatives and shouting them down. There are also people waking up to the impact of Trump Presidency (e.g., repeal of Affordable care act (obamacare - health care)). Some will lose benefits significantly with the repeal and replacement aspects have been unconvincing.

Right now, most of state Governors are Republicans, most of state legislators are Republican and both US Congress and Presidency is controlled by Republicans (though Trump himself is a question mark if he has a true alignment, he has been more of a rabid conservative in some areas lately).

The prospect of next 4 years is waking up many liberals more in a spontaneous sense. It has not gelled into a real movement yet in my view
 
During the 1990s and again over the last several years, the United States engaged in an intense, wide-ranging argument about the contested concept of political correctness. For its most incisive critics, political correctness was a problem insofar as it elevated deference to political sensibilities overstating or acting on the truth.
Last year, numerous supporters of Donald Trump declared over the course of the presidential election that they supported the billionaire in part because they were tired of political correctness, a phenomenon they associated with the political left. A small portion of those voters were itching to engage in hateful speech. In contrast, many others merely hoped that if elected, Trump would govern as a hard-headed businessman who spoke plain truths about problems that the United States faces. No longer would politically tinged falsehoods shape the president’s words or actions.
Alas, that isn’t what happened.
Yes, President Trump is gleeful in offending the political sensibilities of his opponents on the left and right. Sometimes, as with his attacks on the Iraq War, his irreverence is even useful. But Trump’s lodestar isn’t truth. It is an alternative dogma shaped by his peculiar coalition. And it distorts his words and actions as much as any Washington politician. Rather than address the problems that face America, political correctness be damned, Trump constantly utters falsehoods to gain political advantage, coddles Vladamir Putin, and panders to the sensibilities of Breitbart News, the website formerly run by Steve Bannon, his chief strategist.
Since his political correctness is informed by different orthodoxies of thought, it is aimed in a different direction, but its most dangerous attribute is exactly the same: It is grounded in a refusal to deal with the world as it is. What’s more, complaints from across the political spectrum are long overdue, because Trump’s political correctness is already causing him to fail at governing.
This may be most consequential in the realm of counterterrorism.
The United States ought to be on guard against acts of terrorism perpetrated by radical Islamists. And it ought to be on guard against terrorists with other motives, too. Given the scale of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, al-Qaeda’s ambition to top it, and the rise of ISIS, many intelligent observers have concluded that Islamist terrorism is the sort that poses the biggest threat to the West. If that judgment is correct, there is little doubt that the next biggest threat to the West, judged using the same standards, is the one posed by right-wing extremism.
The body count illustrates why that threat is not to be ignored.
The second most deadly terrorist attack in American history occurred on April 19, 1995, when Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols used a truck bomb to blow up an Oklahoma City federal building, killing 169 people and injuring hundreds more. A New America Foundation study released in June 2015 found that right-wing terrorists killed 48 people on U.S. soil in the period after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. For example, on June 17, 2015, the white supremacist Dylann Roof murdered nine people at a historically black church in Charleston, South Carolina. And Wade Michael Page, a 40-year-old with ties to neo-Nazi and white-supremacist groups, killed six and wounded four in a 2012 shooting attack on a Sikh temple.
In Europe, Anders Behring Breivik, an anti-Muslim and anti-feminist radical, killed eight people with a bomb in Oslo, Norway, then shot 69 people at a youth camp for future leaders of his nation, hoping to draw attention to his right-wing manifesto. After extensive study, the Terrorism Research Initiative attributed 303 deaths to right-wing extremist terrorism in Western Europe from 1990 to 2015.
Most recently, on January 29, “Alexandre Bissonnette, a 27-year-old, allegedly burst into the Islamic Cultural Centre in Quebec City and killed six Muslims at prayer,” The Economist reports. “The victims included a university lecturer, a pharmacist and a halal butcher. More than a dozen other worshippers were wounded.” A friend of Bissonnette said the killer was “enthralled by a borderline racist nationalist movement.”
During Barack Obama’s presidency, critics repeatedly charged that Obama was unable to effectively keep America safe because he refused to use the term “Islamic terrorism.” They saw his reticence as political correctness run amuck. Obama retorted that he of course understood the nature of the threat, but that he chose his words carefully to avoid legitimating the religious claims of extremists or helping them to drive a wedge between moderate Muslims and the West. “There is no doubt, and I've said repeatedly, where we see terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda or ISIL, they have perverted and distorted and tried to claim the mantle of Islam for an excuse for basically barbarism," Obama said. "What I have been careful about ... is to not lump these murderers into the billion Muslims that exist around the world, including in this country, who are peaceful … who are fellow troops and police officers and fire fighters and teachers and neighbors and friends."
Obama ordered lethal action against terrorists inspired by a radical interpretation of Islam on hundreds of occasions. Drone strikes approved by his White House killed thousands of people suspected of ties to Al Qaeda or ISIS in majority Muslim countries (along with hundreds of innocent people in those same countries). Regardless, some Obama critics argued that to adequately protect America from a terrorist threat, a president had not only to act, but to name the threat explicitly.
Trump has yet to name right-wing extremism.
He said nothing about the attack in Quebec City. His press secretary, who did mention that attack, suggested that it showed the need for recent security measures taken by the Trump administration, though those measures were targeted narrowly and exclusively at stopping foreign threats from seven majority-Muslim countries. It was as if the press secretary could only conceive of Islamist terrorism.
That is the politically correct posture under Trump.
And Trump hasn’t just failed the conservative “call terrorism by its name” litmus test. It appears his White House will act to reduce right-facing counterterrorism efforts.
“The Trump administration wants to revamp and rename a U.S. government program designed to counter all violent ideologies so that it focuses solely on Islamist extremism,” Reuters reports, citing five people briefed on the matter as sources. “The program, ‘Countering Violent Extremism,’ or CVE, would be changed to ‘Countering Islamic Extremism’ or ‘Countering Radical Islamic Extremism,’ the sources said, and would no longer target groups such as white supremacists who have also carried out bombings and shootings in the United States.”
Those groups will nevertheless remain a threat.
Just three months ago, in fact, “Patrick Stein, Gavin Wright and Curtis Allen were charged with conspiring to detonate a truck bomb in a Kansas apartment complex where more than 100 Somali immigrants lived,” Nick Wing of Huffington Post notes. “All three were members of a white supremacist group called ‘The Crusaders.’ The group espoused ‘sovereign citizen, anti-government, anti-Muslim, and anti-immigrant extremist beliefs,’ according to an FBI agent’s affidavit … All pleaded not guilty.”
 
Will it be an old wine in new bottle...??

[h=1]Trump considers 'brand new' order on immigration[/h]Washington: President Donald Trump is reported to be considering signing a 'brand new' executive order by next week temporarily barring refugees and citizens of seven Muslim-majority nations from entering the country, a day after a US court refused to reinstate his controversial travel ban.

"We will win that battle. The unfortunate part is that it takes time statutorily, but we will win that battle. We also have a lot of other options, including just filing a brand new order,"

To read more click here:
 
Travel ban can be structured so that it need not violate US constitution and also the ethos of the American people at large.
The original ban was rolled out without proper analysis of the policy being put in place. It was also rolled in the most incompetent manner. As such a President of any country needs broad powers to restrict bad elements but it cannot be done to assert a prejudice that is against US constitution.

John Oliver is a British comedian has a show in HBO. Last night he had a special segment on Trump and Truth.

Here is a link to this journalistic/comedy piece.
Because it is a late night comedy there are some 'four letter words' in use and if that offends you, do not watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xecEV4dSAXE
 
Now Trump's NSA resigns within one month of joining! Getting bizarre by the day!!

[h=1]Michael Flynn Resigns as National Security Adviser[/h] By MATTHEW ROSENBERG, MATT APUZZO, GLENN THRUSH and MICHAEL S. SCHMIDTFEB. 13, 2017


WASHINGTON — Michael T. Flynn, the national security adviser, resigned on Monday night after it was revealed that he had misled Vice President Mike Pence and other top White House officials about his conversations with the Russian ambassador to the United States, according to a person close to the Trump administration.
Mr. Flynn, who served in the job for less than a month, stepped down after days of reports that he had spoken to the ambassador in late December about American sanctions against Russia, weeks before Mr. Trump’s inauguration. Mr. Flynn previously had denied that he had any substantive conversations with Ambassador Sergey I. Kislyak, and Mr. Pence repeated that claim in television as recently as earlier this month.
But on Monday, a former administration official said the Justice Department last month warned the White House that Mr. Flynn had not been fully forthright about his conversations with the ambassador. As a result, the Justice Department feared that Mr. Flynn could be vulnerable to blackmail by Moscow.
Officials said Mr. Pence has told others in the White House that he believes Mr. Flynn lied to him by saying he had not discussed the topic of sanctions on a call with the Russian ambassador in late December. Even the mere discussion of policy — and the apparent attempt to assuage the concerns of an American adversary before Mr. Trump took office — represents a remarkable breach of protocol.

The F.B.I. has been examining Mr. Flynn’s phone calls as he has come under growing questions about his interactions with Russian officials and his management of the National Security Council. The blackmail risk envisioned by the Justice Department would stem directly from Mr. Flynn’s attempt to cover his tracks with his bosses. The Russians knew what had been said on the call; thus, if they wanted Mr. Flynn to do something, they could threaten to expose the lie if he refused.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/13/...n-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1
 
I think India's foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar has a point

Dont demonise Trump, says Jaishankar

PTI
February 14, 2017

Mumbai, Feb 14 (PTI)

Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar today said US President Donald Trump, who is under attack over his controversial immigration policy, should not be "demonised".

"Dont demonise Trump, analyse Trump. He represents a thought process. Its not a momentary expression," Jaishankar said during an interactive session at the Gateway House dialogue here.
Trump has been facing heat over his controversial immigration policy after he put a travel ban on citizens from seven Mulsim majority countries and some other decisions of his administration, including those relating to H1B visa which caused concern in India too.

Jaishankar, who delivered an address on "Political change and economic uncertainties" at the event co-hosted by the MEA and Gateway House, also said India has to play a larger role on the global scene.
"At a time when horizons of a lot of major countries are getting narrower...If the major (countries) are pulling back there is a space out there and it is in our interest to use that space. In my view, we should be looking at more powered position in international forum," he said.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/dont-demonise-trump-says-jaishankar/1/882844.html
 
I think India's foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar has a point

Dont demonise Trump, says Jaishankar

PTI
February 14, 2017

Mumbai, Feb 14 (PTI)

Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar today said US President Donald Trump, who is under attack over his controversial immigration policy, should not be "demonised".

"Dont demonise Trump, analyse Trump. He represents a thought process. Its not a momentary expression," Jaishankar said during an interactive session at the Gateway House dialogue here.
Trump has been facing heat over his controversial immigration policy after he put a travel ban on citizens from seven Mulsim majority countries and some other decisions of his administration, including those relating to H1B visa which caused concern in India too.

Jaishankar, who delivered an address on "Political change and economic uncertainties" at the event co-hosted by the MEA and Gateway House, also said India has to play a larger role on the global scene.
"At a time when horizons of a lot of major countries are getting narrower...If the major (countries) are pulling back there is a space out there and it is in our interest to use that space. In my view, we should be looking at more powered position in international forum," he said.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/dont-demonise-trump-says-jaishankar/1/882844.html
A muslim Ban by any other name is unconstitutional. He should have consulted constitutional experts discreetly and sugar coated it. We all understand it is for the safety and we do appreciate that. However, he is getting stupid people like Giuliani advising him and then openly voicing their great tactics instead of being discreet like Obama(A Constitution professor from Harvard) had done. If he surrounds himself with intelligent and politically astute people then his downright idiocy can be covered up. But he is behaving like the Emperor from the "Emperor's New Clothes" story with advise from totally assinine people around him.
 
Last edited:
Trump is a loony. But the Indian minister is right. The US is still a powerful country. It is better for India to stay neutral and play nice if possible to see which way the wind blows. In any case Putin is even more dangerous.
 
A muslim Ban by any other name is unconstitutional. He should have consulted constitutional experts discreetly and sugar coated it. We all understand it is for the safety and we do appreciate that. However, he is getting stupid people like Giuliani advising him and then openly voicing their great tactics instead of being discreet like Obama(A Constitution professor from Harvard) had done. If he surrounds himself with intelligent and politically astute people then his downright idiocy can be covered up. But he is behaving like the Emperor from the "Emperor's New Clothes" story with advise from totally assinine people around him.

But what if the whole of America is asinine? Certainly the people who elected him are.
 
But what if the whole of America is asinine? Certainly the people who elected him are.
Not so quick dear friend. Totally about 60 million people voted for him and that is about one fifth the population of the US as a whole.
So effectively we have 1/5th asinine population. I am definitely not one of those!
His advisers are the cream of the crop of asinines!
 
Within the medical profession and especially among psychiatrists there is code of ethics that prevent them from psychoanalyzing others without first hand interaction face to face. This is true with some of my friends who practice psychiatry as well as other areas.

However recently a few have broken this code of conduct when it comes to analyzing President Trump. I am personally not for this to be done in public.

Here is a very recent news article that appeared in the reputed journal - Scientific American

Source
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...trumps-mental-health/?WT.mc_id=SA_BS_20170217
=======================================================In recent months a growing number of mental health experts and members of the media have offered opinions on Pres. Donald Trump’s psychiatric fitness. On Tuesday 35 U.S. psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers signed a letter to the editor of The New York Times warning about Trump’s mental health.* Its signatories state—despite a self-imposed ethics rule forbidding psychiatrists from offering professional opinions about public figures they have not personally evaluated—they “believe that the grave emotional instability indicated by Mr. Trump’s speech and actions makes him incapable of serving safely as president.”

A number of petitions, including a Change.org petition started by psychologist John Gartner that has garnered more than 20,000 signatures, have called for the chief executive to be removed from office on the grounds he is mentally ill and unfit to perform the duties of president.

In response to these efforts, Allen Frances, an emeritus psychiatrist at Duke University School of Medicine who helped write the standard manual on psychiatric disorders, wrote a separate letter to the Times denouncing attempts to diagnose the president as mentally ill. He explains that Trump lacks the “distress and impairment required to diagnose a mental illness,” adding that bad behavior and mental illness are not synonymous. “Psychiatric name-calling is a misguided way of countering Mr. Trump’s attack on democracy,” Frances wrote. Nevertheless, “he can, and should, be appropriately denounced for his ignorance, incompetence, impulsivity and pursuit of dictatorial powers.”

Historically, psychiatrists have adhered to an ethics dictum known as the Goldwater rule, which appeared in the first edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s code of ethics in 1973. It evolved out of an incident involving presidential candidate Barry Goldwater: In 1964 Fact magazine polled 12,356 psychiatrists on Goldwater’s mental fitness to be president and published an article stating that 1,189 of the 2,417 who responded deemed him psychologically unfit for the job. (Goldwater later won a libel suit against the magazine.)

The mental health professionals writing in the Times, however, felt compelled to speak out: “We fear that too much is at stake to be silent any longer.” Susan Radant, a psychoanalyst and clinical psychologist and director of the Seattle Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, says she was motivated to sign by her worries about Trump’s competence, including his emotional stability, integrity and honesty. “I am hoping this letter will inspire both citizens and, particularly, the Congress to do their jobs,” she wrote in an e-mail, “and step in before our country and the world are permanently damaged.”

Radant thinks it is time to get rid of the Goldwater rule. She says mental health professionals are well qualified to offer certain diagnoses from a distance, pointing out the press, sans training, freely makes such assessments.
Fellow signatory Alexandra Rolde, a psychiatrist affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Newton–Wellesley Hospital, both in Massachusetts, emphasizes the letter does not attempt to diagnose Trump but rather highlights personality traits she and her colleagues find concerning. She does not believe any mental health professional should make a diagnosis without seeing a patient, but thinks it can still be appropriate to comment on how a person’s mental health may affect other people and his or her ability to perform.

The APA continues to stand by the Goldwater rule, however. When asked for comment on the Times letter, the association pointed to a letter published by APA president Maria Oquendo in August 2016. “The unique atmosphere of [the 2016] election cycle may lead some to want to psychoanalyze the candidates,” she wrote at the time. “But to do so would not only be unethical, it would be irresponsible.”

Oquendo goes on to explain that although she understands the desire to get inside the mind of a presidential candidate, especially with the abundance of information about him or her available on the internet, experts must also consider how patients might be affected by seeing their mental health provider offer a medical opinion from a distance. “A patient who sees that might lose confidence in their doctor,” she wrote, “And would likely feel stigmatized by language painting a candidate with a mental disorder (real or perceived) as ‘unfit’ or ‘unworthy’ to assume the presidency.”

*Editor’s Note (2/15/17): This sentence was edited after posting to correct the number of mental health professionals who signed the letter as initially reported by The New York Times.
 
May be psychiatrists are not allowed to diagnose Trump. But as a free citizen I am allowed to criticize Trump based on his obvious actions and words. He only has physical protection from his secret service. If Trump can lash out on Twitter or in rallies whatever he likes the we can also voice our opinions about him. Even a 4th grader can conclude that Trump is loony.
 
Last edited:
Liberal non white can criticize Trump as they are at the receiving end of his decisions.

I can see lot of similarities with Modi who promotes the hindu cause similarly.

Liberals may label Trump as a psycho case. But they can do little about the way he operates.

He uses Twitter to directly reach to people ignoring other media.

He has told Nato allies not to burden the US with Nato financial burden and contribute their share.

He has realised the futility of sanctions against Russia and tried to draw russia from leaning towards china.

He has refused to arbitrate on muslim issues in middle east and making russia take the lead in afganisthan .

He has preferred israel to palestine arabs as jews constitute a powerful segment of US population.

He has every reason to isolate muslims and bar them from his country.

American president has far lesser power than indian PM.

Media and non whites may not like him .

He is there to stay for four years.

India would be smart to safe guard its interests.

Only H1b visa fellows in IT would be shivering in their pants.

IT majors can learn a lesson and send only high class professionals and not averages to US.

His steps will improve the indian IT industry.
Even indian pharmas are improving their quality standards to get US approval..

We require the US to make india quality wise better.

It is doing indian govts job.
 
I can see lot of similarities with Modi who promotes the hindu cause similarly.

He is there to stay for four years.
...

We require the US to make india quality wise better.

It is doing indian govts job.

Like Narendra Modi who is alleged to promote the hindu cause.

One can see lot of such similarities with Modi Bashers and Donald Trump Bashers

U.S got freedom I hope it is nearly 200 years back and definitely not in 1947...

Those who have no worthwhile things to do are free to compare...LOL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
American president has far lesser power than indian PM.

Krishji,
I agree with all your points except this point. The American President has far more power than a PM in a parliamentary democracy, because he is directly elected by the people. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats can remove him in any way other than impeachment (which has a high bar).

Compare this to India, a PM (or a CM) can fall any time if their own party decides to choose a new leader. Further some MPs may defect any time. See the recent exit of James Cameron in the UK and the entry of Theresa May even though the conservative party remains in power.
 
This shows how Trump is being viewed! His approval rating has also fallen steeply in last 3 months

Lawsuits filed against US president in first fortnight of term
Clinton: 5
Bush: 4
Obama: 5
Trump: 55
(NPR)

Source: The Spectator Index
 
Is Trump advocating another independence in US...I can relate this to the Indian Independence movement when we boycotted British products and promoted Swadeshi stuff...But there is no comparison between the pre Independence India when we did not have even freedom of speech and we were shackled by the oppressive British..US is the most powerful nation in the world..It has a mighty economic and military power..That it is harboring protectionism and promoting only US goes against the grain of the country which is a melting pot of various cultural streams!!

Buy American, and hire American: Trump at Joint Address

March 01, 2017 08:14


28live8.jpg


US President Donald Trump delivered his first speech to a joint session of Congress tonight, and he addressed the central planks of his campaign the military, the border, jobs and health care. He said he will not allow the mistakes of decades past to define the course for America's future.

Here are highlights of his speech:


* We must ensure that Americans with pre-existing conditions have access to coverage


* Obamacare is collapsing and we must act decisively to protect all Americans. Action is not a choice, it is a necessity


* Buy American, and hire American!


* For too long, we've watched our middle class shrink, as we've exported our jobs and wealth to foreign countries.


* America must put its own citizens first, because only then can we truly make America great again.


* I am not going to let America be taken advantage of anymore


* We must restart the engine of the American economy, making it easier for companies to do business in the US & much harder for them to leave!


* My Administration has answered the pleas of the American people for immigration enforcement and border security


* I have issued a new directive that American pipelines must be made with American steel


* A surge of optimism is placing impossible dreams firmly within our grasp. What we are witnessing today is the Renewal of the American Spirit


* We are a country that stands united in condemning hate and evil in all of its very ugly forms.

http://news.rediff.com/commentary/2...oint-address/6fc400d4465a365a57511a0b3e2eaebc
 
Last edited:
Will the truth be ever known? No, I guess till the end of Trump Presidency!!

Democrats made up, pushed Russian story: Trump


March 20, 2017 23:40


03donald.jpg

US President Donald Trump today accused the Democratic party of making up allegations about his campaign's links with Russia and the Russian interference in the presidential poll, saying federal investigators should
now instead probe the media leaks of classified information.

"The Democrats made up and pushed the Russian story as an excuse for running a terrible campaign. Big advantage in Electoral College & lost!" Trump said in a tweet, trashing the Democratic party's allegations about Russian meddling in the November 8 polls that brought the real-estate tycoon to power.

The Trump campaign's possible links with top Russian officials, which Trump has vehemently denied, was one of the main election issue and dominated the news cycle since his election and even after his inauguration on January 20.

Trump campaign's alleged links with Russian President Vladimir Putin have been the subject of intense debate and even more of speculation since his election.

Trump's taking aim at the Democrats came as FBI Director James Comey testified before the House Committee on Intelligence, where he said the federal agency was probing the allegations of Russian meddling in the presidential elections and the possible collusion between Trump campaign and Russia.

In a series of tweets before Comey's hearing, Trump said the "real story" the Congress and the FBI should be looking into was leaking of classified information to the media.

"The real story that Congress, the FBI and all others should be looking into is the leaking of classified information. Must find (the) leaker now!" he said.

Trump also referred to statements by former spymaster James Clapper -- the Director of the National Intelligence -- that the Trump campaign had no collusion with the Russians.

http://news.rediff.com/commentary/2...-story-trump/d035f5392ab6e9c4b51e3f73eba65286
 
Is it a right suggestion under changed circumstances?! Let us wait & watch while Indians are attacked, Indian Companies are shown the exit???

[h=1]India should not rush to judge Trump: Foreign Secy Jaishankar[/h]March 21, 2017 22:55


21jaishanakr.jpg

India should guard against "judging" US President Donald Trump in a "rush" and instead take him seriously, Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar today said.

Addressing an industry event in New Delhi, Jaishankar also pitched for building strong regional connectivity, which he said was of paramount interest and was set to get a boost in the near future.

Laying out the rules of engagement with Trump, Jaishankar said it was important to keep in mind that intentions do not always translate into outcomes as he spoke on a wide range of issues.

"I think what is important is to take him (Trump) seriously but also with a caveat that intentions are not always outcomes and even in our bilateral ties I would suggest that if there is a point to make at this stage, it is that
don't rush to judgement," he said.

In making his case, Jaishankar referred to a section of the US media's take that the "American Press took him literally but not seriously but public took him seriously but not literally."

Suggesting that there was a perceptive shift across the world from multilateralism towards bilateralism against the backdrop of a global "uncertainty", Jainshankar referred to the New Delhi's policy of "neighbourhood first".

http://news.rediff.com/commentary/2...y-jaishankar/e1e114c4d975f8fcd4546b32b48d30c5
 
[FONT=&quot][h=1]A teen made a website where kittens punch Trump. So, Trump unleashed his lawyers.[/h]



[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
0d324a9d42b793a84366f08bf1e55112
President Trump is busy this week helping to make sure millions of Americans don't lose their health insuran — -sorry, I mean, shutting down a teenage girl.
17-year-old Lucy from San Francisco recently designed a site called Kittenfeed.com (initially called TrumpScratch), where users get to punch Trump's face with tiny little kitchen paws. It seemed like a pretty harmless, anti-Trump site (the kittens don't even scratch!) — until she got a letter from the lawyers of a certain "well known businessman," The Observer reports.



That "internationally known" and "famous" businessman (his lawyers words, not mine) is, of course, Donald Trump. In the letter, Trump's general counsel encourages the teen to cease and desist and shut down the website.
e5e919aab41d19fa7dfccea524e7f448
Image: www.kittenfeed.com

After receiving the letter, Lucy decided to change the name of the website to Kittenfeed.com. That wasn't enough for Trump's counsel, who reportedly continued to press the 17-year-old girl. The family is waiting to see their next move.
"It’s so sad that his administration is focused more on being liked, burying real news and taking down sites like mine as they supposedly make him look bad," Lucy told The Observer.
Predictably, Trump's lawyers letter had the opposite effect of their intention. After The Observer published the report yesterday, the site's visitors surged from 3,000 to 50,000.
Lesson: you can mess with Trump's lawyers, but don't you ever touch an animated kitten.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/teen-made-website-where-kittens-130015650.html


[/FONT]
 
Looks like Trump will be impeached! Only the timing is to be decided!!

Blackwater founder held secret Seychelles meeting to establish Trump-Putin back channel

The United Arab Emirates arranged a secret meeting in January between Blackwater founder Erik Prince and a Russian close to President Vladi­mir Putin as part of an apparent effort to establish a back-channel line of communication between Moscow and President-elect Donald Trump, according to U.S., European and Arab officials.
The meeting took place around Jan. 11 — nine days before Trump’s inauguration — in the Seychelles islands in the Indian Ocean, officials said. Though the full agenda remains unclear, the UAE agreed to broker the meeting in part to explore whether Russia could be persuaded to curtail its relationship with Iran, including in Syria, a Trump administration objective that would be likely to require major concessions to Moscow on U.S. sanctions.
Though Prince had no formal role with the Trump campaign or transition team, he presented himself as an unofficial envoy for Trump to high-ranking Emiratis involved in setting up his meeting with the Putin confidant, according to the officials, who did not identify the Russian.
Prince was an avid supporter of Trump. After the Republican convention, he contributed $250,000 to Trump’s campaign, the national party and a pro-Trump super PAC led by GOP mega-donor Rebekah Mercer, records show. He has ties to people in Trump’s circle, including Stephen K. Bannon, now serving as the president’s chief strategist and senior counselor. Prince’s sister Betsy DeVos serves as education secretary in the Trump administration. And Prince was seen in the Trump transition offices in New York in December.
U.S. officials said the FBI has been scrutinizing the Seychelles meeting as part of a broader probe of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election and alleged contacts between associates of Putin and Trump. The FBI declined to comment.
FXx6LyTj-h8cAb1HCY24dG-8qIWNT-y2q_jp6n18D5PvXHHEte9p_nVqvdK_s7R8ngcySq17qmzvNXjN_uTe1yAE7gKXko429YS0XO0QSzKtYPhy2sbP0j1XCVMrD4313sPwDorqcCd-w7Rjs5gnufjnKjvKp4jyeKbLRV7ClQfQLNTGQRGnwLVcL8swCNaq9zIgelILeBXcQS6MW7Tle56PeL5lZQWtp5ZYKHA=s0-d-e1-ft


The Seychelles encounter, which one official said spanned two days, adds to an expanding web of connections between Russia and Americans with ties to Trump — contacts that the White House has been reluctant to acknowledge or explain until they have been exposed by news organizations.
“We are not aware of any meetings, and Erik Prince had no role in the transition,” said Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary.
A Prince spokesman said in a statement: “Erik had no role on the transition team. This is a complete fabrication. The meeting had nothing to do with President Trump. Why is the so-called under-resourced intelligence community messing around with surveillance of American citizens when they should be hunting terrorists?”
Prince is best known as the founder of Blackwater, a security firm that became a symbol of U.S. abuses in Iraq after a series of incidents, including one in 2007 in which the company’s guards were accused — and later criminally convicted — of killing civilians in a crowded Iraqi square. Prince sold the firm, which was subsequently re-branded, but has continued building a private paramilitary empire with contracts across the Middle East and Asia. He now heads a Hong Kong-based company known as the Frontier Services Group.
Prince would probably have been seen as too controversial to serve in any official capacity in the Trump transition or administration. But his ties to Trump advisers, experience with clandestine work and relationship with the royal leaders of the Emirates — where he moved in 2010 amid mounting legal problems for his American business — would have positioned him as an ideal go-between.
The Seychelles meeting came after separate private discussions in New York involving high-ranking representatives of Trump with both Moscow and the Emirates.
The White House has acknowledged that Michael T. Flynn, Trump’s original national security adviser, and Trump adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner met with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, in late November or early December in New York.
Team Trump’s ties to Russian interests View Graphic

Flynn and Kushner were joined by Bannon for a separate meeting with the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, who made an undisclosed visit to New York later in December, according to the U.S., European and Arab officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.
In an unusual breach of protocol, the UAE did not notify the Obama administration in advance of the visit, though officials found out because Zayed’s name appeared on a flight manifest.
Officials said Zayed and his brother, the UAE’s national security adviser, coordinated the Seychelles meeting with Russian government officials with the goal of establishing an unofficial back channel between Trump and Putin.
Officials said Zayed wanted to be helpful to both leaders, who had talked about working more closely together, a policy objective long advocated by the crown prince. The UAE, which sees Iran as one of its main enemies, also shared the Trump team’s interest in finding ways to drive a wedge between Moscow and Tehran.
Zayed met twice with Putin in 2016, according to Western officials, and urged the Russian leader to work more closely with the Emirates and Saudi Arabia — an effort to isolate Iran.
At the time of the Seychelles meeting and for weeks afterward, the UAE believed that Prince had the blessing of the new administration to act as its unofficial representative. The Russian participant was a person whom Zayed knew was close to Putin from his interactions with both men, the officials said.
Scrutiny over Russia
When the Seychelles meeting took place, official contacts between members of the incoming Trump administration and the Russian government were under intense scrutiny, both from federal investigators and the press.
Less than a week before the Seychelles meeting, U.S. intelligence agencies released a report accusing Russia of intervening clandestinely during the 2016 election to help Trump win the White House.
The FBI was already investigating communications between Flynn and Kislyak. The Washington Post’s David Ignatius first disclosed those communications on Jan. 12, around the time of the Seychelles meeting. Flynn was subsequently fired by Trump for misleading Vice President Pence and others about his discussions with Kislyak.
Yousef Al Otaiba, the UAE’s ambassador in Washington, declined to comment.
Government officials in the Seychelles said they were not aware of any meetings between Trump and Putin associates in the country around Jan. 11. But they said luxury resorts on the island are ideal for clandestine gatherings like the one described by the U.S., European and Arab officials.
“I wouldn’t be surprised at all,” said Barry Faure, the Seychelles secretary of state for foreign affairs. “The Seychelles is the kind of place where you can have a good time away from the eyes of the media. That’s even printed in our tourism marketing. But I guess this time you smelled something.”
Trump has dismissed the investigations of Russia’s role in the election as “fake news” and a “witch hunt.”
The level of discretion surrounding the Seychelles meeting seems extraordinary given the frequency with which senior Trump advisers, including Flynn and Kushner, had interacted with Russian officials in the United States, including at the high-profile Trump Tower in New York.
Steven Simon, a National Security Council senior director for the Middle East and North Africa in the Obama White House, said: “The idea of using business cutouts, or individuals perceived to be close to political leaders, as a tool of diplomacy is as old as the hills. These unofficial channels are desirable precisely because they are deniable; ideas can be tested without the risk of failure.”
Current and former U.S. officials said that while Prince refrained from playing a direct role in the Trump transition, his name surfaced so frequently in internal discussions that he seemed to function as an outside adviser whose opinions were valued on a range of issues, including plans for overhauling the U.S. intelligence community.
He appears to have particularly close ties to Bannon, appearing multiple times as a guest on Bannon’s satellite radio program over the past year as well as in articles on the Breitbart Web site that Bannon ran before joining the Trump campaign.
In a July interview with Bannon, Prince said those seeking forceful U.S. leadership should “wait till January and hope Mr. Trump is elected.” And he lashed out at President Barack Obama, saying that because of his policies “the terrorists, the fascists, are winning.”
Days before the November election, Prince appeared on Bannon’s program again, saying that he had “well-placed sources” in the New York City Police Department telling him they were preparing to make arrests in the investigation of former congressman Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) over allegations he exchanged sexually explicit texts with a minor. Flynn tweeted a link to the Breitbart report on the claim. No arrests occurred.
Prince went on to make unfounded assertions that damaging material recovered from Weiner’s computers would implicate Hillary Clinton and her close adviser, Huma Abedin, who was married to Weiner. He also called Abedin an “agent of influence very sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood.”
Prince and his family were major GOP donors in 2016. The Center for Responsive Politics reported that the family gave more than $10 million to GOP candidates and super PACs, including about $2.7 million from his sister, DeVos, and her husband.
Prince’s father, Edgar Prince, built his fortune through an auto-parts company. Betsy married Richard DeVos Jr., heir to the Amway fortune.
Erik Prince has had lucrative contracts with the UAE government, which at one point paid his firm a reported $529 million to help bring in foreign fighters to help assemble an internal paramilitary force capable of carrying out secret operations and protecting Emirati installations from terrorist attacks.
Focus on Iran
The Trump administration and the UAE appear to share a similar preoccupation with Iran. Current and former officials said that Trump advisers were focused throughout the transition period on exploring ways to get Moscow to break ranks with Tehran.
“Separating Russia from Iran was a common theme,” said a former intelligence official in the Obama administration who met with Trump transition officials. “It didn’t seem very well thought out. It seemed a little premature. They clearly had a very specific policy position, which I found odd given that they hadn’t even taken the reins and explored with experts in the U.S. government the pros and cons of that approach.”
Michael McFaul, former U.S. ambassador to Russia, said he also had discussions with people close to the Trump administration about the prospects of drawing Russia away from Iran. “When I would hear this, I would think, ‘Yeah that’s great for you guys, but why would Putin ever do that?’ ” McFaul said. “There is no interest in Russia ever doing that. They have a long relationship with Iran. They’re allied with Iran in fighting in Syria. They sell weapons to Iran. Iran is an important strategic partner for Russia in the Middle East.”
Following the New York meeting between the Emiratis and Trump aides, Zayed was approached by Prince, who said he was authorized to act as an unofficial surrogate for the president-elect, according to the officials. He wanted Zayed to set up a meeting with a Putin associate. Zayed agreed and proposed the Seychelles as the meeting place because of the privacy it would afford both sides. “He wanted to be helpful,” one official said of Zayed.
Wealthy Russians and Emirati royalty have a particularly large footprint on the islands. Signs advertising deep-sea fishing trips are posted in Cyrillic. Russian billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov owns North Island, where Prince William and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, went on their honeymoon in 2011. Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, president of the UAE, built a hilltop palace for himself with views across the chain of islands.
The Emiratis have given hundreds of millions of dollars to the Seychelles in recent years for causes including public health and affordable housing. But when the Emirati royal family visits, they are rarely seen.
“The jeep comes to their private jet on the tarmac and they disappear,” said one Seychellois official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he did not want to be seen as criticizing the Emiratis.
Zayed, the crown prince, owns a share of the Seychelles’ Four Seasons, a collection of private villas scattered on a lush hillside on the main island’s southern shore, overlooking the Indian Ocean, according to officials in the Seychelles. The hotel is tucked away on a private beach, far from the nearest public road.
Current and former U.S. officials who have worked closely with Zayed, who is often referred to as MBZ, say it would be out of character for him to arrange the Jan. 11 meeting without getting a green light in advance from top aides to Trump and Putin, if not the leaders themselves. “MBZ is very cautious,” said an American businessman who knows Zayed and spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject. “There had to be a nod.”
The Seychelles meeting was deemed productive by the UAE and Russia, but the idea of arranging additional meetings between Prince and Putin’s associates was dropped, officials said. Even unofficial contacts between Trump and Putin associates had become too politically risky, officials said.
Sieff reported from the Seychelles. Julie Tate, Devlin Barrett, Matea Gold, Tom Hamburger and Rosalind S. Helderman contributed to this report.







https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...489b735b3a3_story.html?utm_term=.9abe61bb7a5e
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top