prveeraraghavan
Member
There are some orthodox cultural items that I still like to follow like SandhyaVandhanam (don't do everyday, but haven't left it either) and AvaniAvittam; however, I don't find it practical to try to follow every aspect of what is outlined in Dharma Shastras or blindly worshipping the Sankaracharyas as Bhagavan, especially having been born and raised abroad. Also, some aacharams like ecchal make sense to me, but I'm not too sure I understand why I need to really follow the others in modern day times.
I find myself enjoying the more modern day Hindu movements like Chinmaya Mission or Arsha Vidya Gurukulam, as opposed to the traditional Shankaracharya lineage. That being said, I definitely want to still have the tradition of Veda Pathasalas so that we can continue to have vaadyars/shastris and temple culture.
Does anyone else feel this way? What are other's thoughts?
Are there other neo-Vedantic Hindu movements that we should also be wary of? Ramakrishna Mission seems like it can be subverted very easily with Western Universalism. I never liked ISKCON. I also am not a fan of the pseudo-spiritual movements like the Art of Living. I'm more neutral about Sadhguru and Isha Foundation for right now.
I find myself enjoying the more modern day Hindu movements like Chinmaya Mission or Arsha Vidya Gurukulam, as opposed to the traditional Shankaracharya lineage. That being said, I definitely want to still have the tradition of Veda Pathasalas so that we can continue to have vaadyars/shastris and temple culture.
Does anyone else feel this way? What are other's thoughts?
Are there other neo-Vedantic Hindu movements that we should also be wary of? Ramakrishna Mission seems like it can be subverted very easily with Western Universalism. I never liked ISKCON. I also am not a fan of the pseudo-spiritual movements like the Art of Living. I'm more neutral about Sadhguru and Isha Foundation for right now.