Wouldn't it take the side of Dharma?
Dharma too isnt about taking sides.
Dharma is the eternal state of being.
If our actions generate frequency to tilt the scales of balance auto reset happens to bring back the scales to balance.
Auto reset could function in many ways and totally realized perfected beings too might function as an instrument to help reinstate the delicate balance what we call the avatar who reinstates the scales of balance.
Dharma is the balance which we all have to collectively maintain through our general and individualized kartvayam.
Did Krishna side with the Pandavas?
Honestly no.
Its just that the Pandavas were the instruments to reinstate balance.
Outwardly it might have looked as if Krishna favored the Pandavas but at a microlevel he favored no one as His mission was to reset the scales.
Energy also is technically neutral.
Sravna supports Russia for some personal reasons.
If Russia will subdue USA and reduce the dominance of USA, well it might be who knows..it could be a bigger picture which we might not know.
So best is to observe as a neutral observer and not take sides cos we should ask ourselves .." Who is that who is taking the side of Russia?"
Its like a Naan Yaar question.
So " Who is it that is thinking that spiritual energy takes the side of Dharma?"
Or even for myself .." Who is that which wrote all these?"
The answer is our ego.