Please do not make me repeat what I have said already. Kindly go back and refer to what I have said for the conditions being necessary. I did not say they are sufficient.
Are you going to respond the challenge to prove what you said or not?Please do not make me repeat what I have said already. Kindly go back and refer to what I have said for the conditions being necessary. I did not say they are sufficient.
Please. A premise like 2 is a prime number is definitely true and it cannot be countered and so the refutation becomes logically correct unlike your example that sannyasis have only basic intelligence etc etc Kindly read up on elementary theory of logic before you proceed further so that everyone's time is not wasted.Are you going to respond the challenge to prove what you said or not?
You are caught in the web of your own illogical statements. Let me prove again the absurdity of what you have written lately
A. You schooled me in Post 71 that " "For some conclusion to logically follow from a premise , the premise has to be not only necessary but also sufficient." These are are your words. But then in your last post you claim you only meant that your list in Post 1 is only satisfying necessary conditions. That means what you have written subsequently do NOT logically follow your prmise.
B. Example cannot prove but can disprove claims. In SAT level example let us say you claim all prime numbers are odd. I only have to give example of number 2 to show your statements are false. I have shown by examples why your list in post 1 is neither necessary or sufficient. It is just some silly thing that came in your mind that you came here to dole out to all of us.
C. If you cannot understand my example as to why your list is not satisfying necessary condition then prove your assertion that your list satisfies necessary condition.
If you cannot do that even, then stop making illogical statements just because it came to your brain. You may want to think before you write here.
I think you do not have logic on your side and do not have courage to own up to your mistakes. So you will dodge once again without getting into details. Stop wasting the bytes here as my sparring friend would say
You are dodging and not really responding to the logical challenges.Please. A premise like 2 is a prime number is definitely true and it cannot be countered and so the refutation becomes logically correct unlike your example that sannyasis have only basic intelligence etc etc Kindly read up on elementary theory of logic before you proceed further so that everyone's time is not wasted.
Little knowledge is very dangerous. Please get yourself a good book or a good tutor on logic before you present your argument.You are dodging and not really responding to the logical challenges.
I said as an example if someone who is illogical claimed that all prime numbers are odd then showing a single example that 2 is prime and even is enough to dismiss the claim.
The above was used to show you how examples are useful to disprove claims and it has nothing to do with what that number 2 represents.
What part of the above you did not understand???
You have made claim in post 1 that you cannot prove.
I have shown you all that is wrong with your statements and claims
Someone coming to an open forum is expected to respectfully respond to challenges with specifics.
Otherwise you are conceding that you are just blabbering here opening threads without thinking.
One must learn how to debate before writing whatever comes to the mind.
Be aware that I am here to point out logical flaws and all the blabberings.
You are yet to prove what you said in Post 1Please spare yourself the task of finding logical flaws and blabberings . It is an insult to those who can do it.
I will give up.. It is not possible to get Sravana to present anything logical or meaningful. I wasted by time and time of anyone reading. The idea is to prevent future threads that lower the value of his whole forum. First it was about spirituality and his powers and then it is some illogical claims & topics doled out to the members in a condescening way,:focus:
Even though the topic is illogical.
Please spare others.
Your statements have already been shown as wrong. Here is a recap.Alright. This is what I said
In my view happiness happens out of the following three factors:
i. One's health
ii. One's intelligence
iii. One's wealth
So if one is lacking in one of these, one's happiness comes down.
So I stated them as only necessary conditions for happiness and not as sufficient conditions.
Then I gave the following reasons for necessary conditions
let us assume some one is not healthy, intelligent or wealthy. Dont you think ill health will cause suffering and reduce happiness and lack of intelligence will not help you coping up with problems in the right way and lack of wealth will not give the happiness that basic amount of wealth will give?
dear Shri a-TB, try to rebut the above .
One cannot read other people's motives. They can only see their actions. Motives assigned will be one's imagination and is used to divide people into groups - group that think like me and groups that do not. That is divisive. Such divisive people cannot be happyIf you are able to have the right attitude towards others real motives then you will react either in a humorous way or feel sympathy for that person. The behaviour will not affect you in a negative way.