• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

When Hindus ate beef, India was NEVER conquered

Status
Not open for further replies.
The extract of Swami Ramakrishnananda narrates the following:

Kantimathi : Mother of Ramanuja

Kanthmathi : Sister of Ramanuja
Mahadevi : -do-

The names of Kanthimathi and Mahadevi are Saivite names. One of the names of Lord Shiva is Mahadeva. Mahadevi therefore is the name of Goddess Parvathi. Similarly, the name Kanthimathi relates to Goddess Parvathi. The Goddess' name of Tirunelveli Nelliappar temple is Kanthimathi.

Ramanuja's father Kesavacharya probably belonged to Advaida Sect. The head of Sankara Mutts is called Sankaracharya. It is said Ramanuja's teacher was an Advaidee.

It is, therefore, no doubt Ramanuja was a born Vadama.

Comprehension problem. Deserves sympathy. LOL.
 
It is comprehension problem, KUSHAPPAM or Avial. But the Ambal names Kanthimathi and Mahadevi stay, confirming the background of Ramanuja.

The argument is the suffix Dikshidhar is best suited to Vaishnavites. We may, therefore, call Ramanuja as Ramanuja Dikshdhar, which should have been the case, had he stayed in the Smartha fold.
 
It is comprehension problem, KUSHAPPAM or Avial. But the Ambal names Kanthimathi and Mahadevi stay, confirming the background of Ramanuja.

The argument is the suffix Dikshidhar is best suited to Vaishnavites. We may, therefore, call Ramanuja as Ramanuja Dikshdhar, which should have been the case, had he stayed in the Smartha fold.
hi

jesus was NOT A CHRISTIAN....HE WAS JEW.....LIKE WISE RAMANUJA WAS NOT VAISHNAVA....HE WAS SMARTHA....;LATER

CALLED JESUS AS CHRISTIAN...RAMANUJA CALLED VAISHNAVA......MAY BE VISHNU BHAKTHA....
 
hi
jesus was NOT A CHRISTIAN....HE WAS JEW.....LIKE WISE RAMANUJA WAS NOT VAISHNAVA....HE WAS SMARTHA....;LATER
CALLED JESUS AS CHRISTIAN...RAMANUJA CALLED VAISHNAVA......MAY BE VISHNU BHAKTHA....

A blatant lie told repeatedly will not become a truth. Interested group of people may believe it to be truth and go crowing about it. The truth will remain unaffected by all this noise.

If Ramanuja is respected and claimed by people to be of their own, it is just good. It will do a lot of good to the claimants.

The latest luminary to join the long list of fans of Ramanuja is the muththamizh viththakar MK himself.

The vaishnavas quietly enjoy the fun. LOL.
 
It is not strange or unusual that converts are very strong in their adopted religion / sect. Ramanuja is not an exception.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top