Mr KRN stated in post 16 in the Bhajagovindam thread (Philosophy section) that
"
Saguna Brahman as a staged evolution to Nirguna Brahman is well dealt with, in the Brahma Sutra Bhashyam."
From Wikipedia (I know that is not always accurate) it says
"In Hinduism, Brahman connotes the highest Universal Principle, the Ultimate Reality in the universe. In major schools of Hindu philosophy, it is the material, efficient, formal and final cause of all that exists. It is the pervasive, genderless, infinite, eternal truth and bliss which does not change, yet is the cause of all changes. "
So this translation of Brhaman going to through a staged evolution is not logical because evolution staged or not mean change.
Mr KRN, Could you please shed some light on what you meant here? You say Sankara wrote this. Where is that writen? Is that a correct translation (Staged evoluion) or it is your own way to express your understanding.
How can something that cannot change , evole?
Thank you
"
Saguna Brahman as a staged evolution to Nirguna Brahman is well dealt with, in the Brahma Sutra Bhashyam."
From Wikipedia (I know that is not always accurate) it says
"In Hinduism, Brahman connotes the highest Universal Principle, the Ultimate Reality in the universe. In major schools of Hindu philosophy, it is the material, efficient, formal and final cause of all that exists. It is the pervasive, genderless, infinite, eternal truth and bliss which does not change, yet is the cause of all changes. "
So this translation of Brhaman going to through a staged evolution is not logical because evolution staged or not mean change.
Mr KRN, Could you please shed some light on what you meant here? You say Sankara wrote this. Where is that writen? Is that a correct translation (Staged evoluion) or it is your own way to express your understanding.
How can something that cannot change , evole?
Thank you