H
hariharan1972
Guest
I have always wondered why there exists such deep-rooted hatred for the Brahmins in TN.
Could it be that "all brahmins" were downright bad or evil vis-a-vis the other castes ? Plain logic tells me that it cannot be so. There may have been some bad apples but i don't think the community itself can be accused of casteist behaviour.
Could this be due to the "ideology extremists" such as Periyar etc... who based on certain personal events (which could have been caused by some "bad apples") started the "negative campaigning" against brahmins ? Does this mean that people displayed a "herd mentality" and didn't apply their minds ?
Did Brahmins really deprive education & other opportunities to the other castes ? Life histories of Ambedkar, Bharathiyaar etc... suggest otherwise. Also one of the TB posts revealed the "castewise breakup" of students enrollment suggest that there was nothing preventing opportunities for other castes ?
Realistically can a community which was say 15% of population dominate say 70% (leaving other religious groups) ? I am sure as a well learned community they would have realised that the community is in a minority and may not be able to "hold on" for too long ?
Did Brahmins actually practice the much hated & written about "Manuwadi" culture ?. I know "Untouchability" was prevalent but were the brahmins the
"only" perpetrators ?
Did Brahmins "ignore" the "signals" & failed to see the "approaching storm" thereby not taking "course corrective" steps ?
Is it because by "unwittingly" being the first to adopting the "small family norm", we allowed the community to dwindle into a (even smaller) minority thereby weakening us further ? (Ofcourse it is not to suggest that going forward we should have cricket teams in households)
Or is it plain jealousy ?
Any Thoughts ???
Could it be that "all brahmins" were downright bad or evil vis-a-vis the other castes ? Plain logic tells me that it cannot be so. There may have been some bad apples but i don't think the community itself can be accused of casteist behaviour.
Could this be due to the "ideology extremists" such as Periyar etc... who based on certain personal events (which could have been caused by some "bad apples") started the "negative campaigning" against brahmins ? Does this mean that people displayed a "herd mentality" and didn't apply their minds ?
Did Brahmins really deprive education & other opportunities to the other castes ? Life histories of Ambedkar, Bharathiyaar etc... suggest otherwise. Also one of the TB posts revealed the "castewise breakup" of students enrollment suggest that there was nothing preventing opportunities for other castes ?
Realistically can a community which was say 15% of population dominate say 70% (leaving other religious groups) ? I am sure as a well learned community they would have realised that the community is in a minority and may not be able to "hold on" for too long ?
Did Brahmins actually practice the much hated & written about "Manuwadi" culture ?. I know "Untouchability" was prevalent but were the brahmins the
"only" perpetrators ?
Did Brahmins "ignore" the "signals" & failed to see the "approaching storm" thereby not taking "course corrective" steps ?
Is it because by "unwittingly" being the first to adopting the "small family norm", we allowed the community to dwindle into a (even smaller) minority thereby weakening us further ? (Ofcourse it is not to suggest that going forward we should have cricket teams in households)
Or is it plain jealousy ?
Any Thoughts ???