JR
Hare Krishna
JayKay ji and others (TBS),
Here are few points that I think is worth analyzing into, for concluding (IMO) that racism in own land is tolerable:
1. Ability to apply சாம, தான, பேத, தண்டம் with liberty.
2. More knowledge of the nature of opposing party. More contacts that could tap into the key figures in that party which is carrying out racist operations and facilitate mediation and truce efforts with the opposition.
3. Support and sympathy from general populace. More exposure via news media and thus increased ability to gather strength and support from one's own group to fight against racism.
4. Possible availability of historical data. There could be evidences of similar racist attack in the past, from which legal, governmental and financial solutions and support could be drawn.
Due to the above factors I think racism in own land is better than from West/foreign land. What do you think?
(Afterall, it is better to carry one's own பொதி).
Cheers,
JR
Here are few points that I think is worth analyzing into, for concluding (IMO) that racism in own land is tolerable:
1. Ability to apply சாம, தான, பேத, தண்டம் with liberty.
2. More knowledge of the nature of opposing party. More contacts that could tap into the key figures in that party which is carrying out racist operations and facilitate mediation and truce efforts with the opposition.
3. Support and sympathy from general populace. More exposure via news media and thus increased ability to gather strength and support from one's own group to fight against racism.
4. Possible availability of historical data. There could be evidences of similar racist attack in the past, from which legal, governmental and financial solutions and support could be drawn.
Due to the above factors I think racism in own land is better than from West/foreign land. What do you think?
(Afterall, it is better to carry one's own பொதி).
Cheers,
JR
Last edited: