Dear Shri Suraju,
Since you are talking for yourself only and claim that you do not come under the orthodox group, I accept the same. But written language has some limitations and it is not always possible to describe each person individually in posts like those in this forum. For example, S/Shri Nara, myself, Smt. HH and sometimes Shri Kunjuppu are all bracketed as "reformers/reformists", sometimes as those who do "brahman-bashing", etc., for the sake of convenience to indicate all the persons in the opposing team by one collective term. But it may not always be the exact true position.
I do not get what you mean by "homogenisation" and hence I am unable to make any comments at this point. Now the word "nihilist" has the following dictionary meanings:
Someone who rejects all theories of morality or religious belief, An advocate of anarchism.
Before I try to answer your comment about my "nihilist's approach" pl. let me know whether you impute all the above aspects or only some.
Similarly, the last sentence in your post viz., "Only difference is that we refuse to accept defeat and keep fighting whereas the reformists have already buckled and wilted under pressure.", appears to convey something but what exactly is not clear. For example, what kind of pressure and for what?, how do you conclude that the reformists hold whatever view/s you find expressed by them because "they have buckled and wilted" under that (presently unclear) external (very possibly, from the context) pressure and that it cannot be as a result of their own thinking without any external forces pressurizing them to change.
Dear Sangom Sir,
I had posted my reply to your questions in the above post yesterday itself. But i find that that has been deleted obviously for the reason that it had the banned words like reformists etc., in it. The ban came into effect just before my posting perhaps. I used those words only as a matter of convenience as you have used them in your quoted post here. But moderator chose to delete my post while leaving your post and this gives an impression that I have not cared to answer your question or that I have no answers. So I will be posting my reply after editing the banned words from it so that you can know what I have to say in reply to your valid queries. If the moderator closes this thread before that I will send my reply by a PM to you. I will Cheers.
Dear Sri suraju Ji,
Just for the record:
1. Sri Sangom Ji's above cited post was made on 19-03-2011 at my local time 3:46 AM.
2. My post announcing the Labeling rule was announced on 19-03-2011 at 9:29 PM.
3. Your response to Sri Sangom Ji, that violated this rule was on 20-03-2011 at 11:37 AM, and after you have posted a response that did not label.
YOURS CAME MUCH LATER AFTER THE RULE WAS ANNOUNCED, WHILE SRI SANGOM JI'S POST CAME BEFORE I ANNOUNCED THE RULE.
In the future, please do not question the moderator's neutrality, saying things that somehow are supposed to show that I am partial towards some members.
Last edited by a moderator: