Devas were not always good. Sometimes they were soundly beaten by the Asuras.
And of course the king of the Devas, Indra was a confirmed womanizer.
Agreed..these Devas were nothing really great.
Indra is the King of Fornication.
Devas were not always good. Sometimes they were soundly beaten by the Asuras.
And of course the king of the Devas, Indra was a confirmed womanizer.
Dear Sravna,
One becomes whole when one falls?
If one was Purnam to start with..why does one even need to fall to start with?
A Purnam should be contended with self and not fall for anything or anyone.
A Purnam is a Patita Pavana!LOL
Dear Renuka,
Your thinking is correct. But can anybody be purnam except God? and even god will possess attributes depending on time, space and intent of his avatar.
Do God's avatars only show up in India? Or do they also arrive in all the other continents?
hiThey are called wives!LOL
Obama is in the USA.
Hmm, then Hillary may be an avatar of Mahishashuramardini.
I somehow do not like Hillary Clinton.
I would not want her to be President.
I think you would want Trump to win. Ancient India and Trump's America would be poles apart. But I think it should be fine. It is just another way of living life. Only thing is one should not mess with others unless they can be absolutely sure they can get away with that.
I think we should just honestly recognize the issue as classic Aryan vs. non Aryan battles.
The only thing to remember is that there are no pure Aryans or non Aryans any more. Which is all for the better, I think.
Actually, the rigvedic "Hindus" if we may so call, consisted of only the Aryans; the fourth category "Sudra" was a niche for all the non-Aryans and Aryan-non Aryan mixtures. This has been continued due to some of our puranas and other scriptures, although there may still be small islands of genetically "pure" Aryans and non-Aryans (The tribes of Andamans are stated to be pure "southies, whereas some of the Kashmiri population groups are "pure" northies.)Actually there are no Aryans and Dravidians. It was created by vested interests to divide Hindus.
Actually, the rigvedic "Hindus" if we may so call, consisted of only the Aryans; the fourth category "Sudra" was a niche for all the non-Aryans and Aryan-non Aryan mixtures. This has been continued due to some of our puranas and other scriptures, although there may still be small islands of genetically "pure" Aryans and non-Aryans (The tribes of Andamans are stated to be pure "southies, whereas some of the Kashmiri population groups are "pure" northies.)
Sangomji,
I do not think we have clear answers...Rig vedic Hindus were not pure Aryans..It had black colored people amongst them..Some of the puranic rishis were not fair but black in color..I heard that Kerala's first CPM CM EMS who is a Brahmin by Birth was black in color..I have seen many Brahmins as black as coal..Do not create Aryan /Non aryan divisions..May be Aryan meant noble birth..Not a race connection at all...
As the extent of this mixture is more in the South, the Southern Brahmins are typically darker than NI Brahmins. Simple? As usual there are exceptions to every rule.
.
Sangomji,
I do not think we have clear answers...Rig vedic Hindus were not pure Aryans..It had black colored people amongst them..Some of the puranic rishis were not fair but black in color..I heard that Kerala's first CPM CM EMS who is a Brahmin by Birth was black in color..I have seen many Brahmins as black as coal..Do not create Aryan /Non aryan divisions..May be Aryan meant noble birth..Not a race connection at all...