Oh I did not claim original authorship in my writing, on the contrary I disclosed that there was various source. I edited some of it so I can not quote source.
Disclosing bluntly that the content of the posting is through various books and quoting the actual source by citing the relevant links makes the difference. It makes the posting more authenticated. This is the Forum ethics.
You on the other hand searched for the words I use to find some of the source.
First and foremost thing you should know is that you have absolutely no business to question me or my act and I am not obliged to answer your unnecessary questions.
Your contributions in a public Forum like this is subject to comments, analysis, evaluation, scrutinization, etc
Have you stopped to find why you do that? What is your motivation? What have you contributed to the discussion? This is purely a chat room not a research paper for PHD.
If contributing to the discussion mean just copy n pasting from various books and concluding with a note that “My knowledge is gained through reading books and articles that I believe. unlike some of the "self described GODS" who were born with knowledge and arrogantly claim it in this site.” that is not my cup of tea.
I have every authority to award you for anything I think fit.
This is childish.
If that is the case, prove it with relevant Forum rules.
I suppose you have not seen a mirror, but if you see dictionary your picture is next smugness.
I think you don’t see anything else except the mirror, and feel proud about your c n p contribution without disclosing the actual source links which is your M.O - I hope.
