LOL! You know what??
I was thinking of the same thing!
The crowd wont clap unless the Miss World says World Peace!LOL
So I guess Sattva genes wins the crown!
-
This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
Meritocracy and Quotas
- Thread starter kunjuppu
- Start date
- Status
LOL! You know what??
I was thinking of the same thing!
The crowd wont clap unless the Miss World says World Peace!LOL
So I guess Sattva genes wins the crown!
N
Nara
Guest
That is precisely the logic you are using here, Boyd showed genetic changes occurred in one group that developed lactose tolerance while the other group did not, and you take this ஆனைக்கு அர்ரம் and want to apply it to your pet theory that Brahmins have developed their own cultural-gene in குதிரைக்கு குர்ரம் fashion.
Nuclear fission analogy does not work here as it was not mere speculation before it was experimentally proven, there was solid mathematical proof. Citing Boyd's lactose tolerance study and concluding Brahmin culture is hard coded into their gene is unconscionable. This can only remain your pet theory. Prove it the way Boyd did. Until then, don't make grandiose claims.
thank you ....
They could very well be satvic jeans.
I am trying to figure this sentence out:
1) Have gun; (and) will travel!
2) Have gun; (and you) will travel!
3) Have gun? (then I) will travel!
4) Have (how) gun will travel!(?)
5) None of the above, but somethng else. (then pls clarify)
Vaagmi
0
dear Renukaji,
I have no sattva gene theory. Ok. That having been settled, let us for the purpose of discussion the sattvik culture's impact on genes(what I have been telling all along). Why do you want to bring in complicated panchikarana into the picture. Many of the members here may not like it or may not understand it as they may not have the time to study vedanta. I can give you my answer in a simple way which you can understand easily and to which you can relate easily.
Saibaba when he took his food (breakfast, lunch or dinner) he was rajasic predominently. When he slept in the night he was tamasic predominantly. When he gave lectures or met his devotees he was predominantly saatvik. Now what do you call saibaba? Was he a saatvik individual or a tamasic individual or a rajasic individual? The guna which is predominent determines one's personality. Dont you think so?
Think about it. There you have the answer to your questions.
LOL, mine was just a funny comment to Renu. You don't have to get into it, unless you want yourself everywhere of course.
Ofcourse there were. One was Yamaka. He is not posting here anymore. Anyways who needs anyone here. After all folks here are know-it-alls; with satvik genes from an evolved genepool
How sure you are about this? You have given this as a matter of fact. Is it so?
I remember you invoked the authority of Frits Staal in some other earlier discussion thread on rituals. He has a 180 degree opposite view. He has spent his life time in studying rituals, especially Hindu rituals.
Without giving a shred of evidence you have asserted the opposite. Such bland averments make your scholarship suspect and agenda based, notwithstanding the obeisance your posts get from the "faithfuls" over here.
Dear Vaagmi Ji,
So my dear Vaagmi..your "Sattva Gene Theory" remains a Kha Puspha (Flowers in the Sky)!LOL
Frits Staal and other historians such as Priyatosh Banerjee have dealt with the subject of creating elaborate yagnas -- this happened during the period of composition of the brahmanas (texts). That is, these rituals were created in kuru-panchala region during a specific period of time. They did not exist before that. The way rituals are performed do change with time. Once upon a time animals were sacrificed in yagnas, now they are not. Even simple rituals like punyahavachanam are not really constant, today any fruit readily available is used to represent the navagrahas.
More like BS in the sky, i'd say.
Vaagmi
0
aaah vaagmi, you betray your age sir.
there are no more hippies anywhere. in fact they are gone since the 80s. most of the folks anywhere under 35 would not know what it means. with exceptions ofcourse
If you really want to know ask Fritjof Capra. By his own admission he was a hippie for some time. He is a particle physicist and writer of top class books. He may be able to answer you.
Vaagmi
0
Where did you get this sattva gene theory? Quote Chapter and verse please as my learned professor has taught me, now, now, right now.
My doubt was about the structure of the sentence; not about the kinetics of the gun !
Vaagmi
0
palindrome needs a quick advice from a doctor for her obsession with BS. Renuka please try your hand of course with gloves.
Dear Vaagmi Ji,
You make me laugh!
Firstly you talk about Sattva Genes and now you openly claim you do not have a Theory.
Then you somehow actually feel and conclude that members might not be interested in Panchikarana and worse still might not understand it!
You know..if I have no answers I just say I don't know and never assume other members do not know.
the one doing all the BS needs a quicker examination, perhaps a psychiatrist's intervention too...and renu won't try the BS guy. lol.
Dear Vaagmi ji,
Hey Didle Diddle
The cat and the fiddle
The cow jumped over the moon
The little dog laughed to see such sport and the dish ran away with the spoon.
Ok you see..since the Cow jumped over the moon..on the way back to earth it cleared its bowels mid air!LOL
that's perfect BS in the sky
And the BS smelled of flowers (kha pushpa), still the cow believed its own theory to be true amnesia or not.
Vaagmi
0
Please tell me what do you have to say about saibaba. Selective amnesia is extremely dangerous.
Last edited:
Vaagmi
0
Come on be on course. Give me the chapter and verse.
Vaagmi
0
Is the gun a recoilless one or not. On that depends the travelling.
Ok. But a constant supply does not imply that the bullets that have gone out are not sacrifices. That fact stays irrespective of the replenishment.
- Status
