S
SuryaKasyapa
Guest
There are many who believe in astrology,and horoscope based predictions/matching-- as also many who reject and oppose astrology.
Still more are the fence sitters,the confused, the 'take-only-favourable"s etc.
There have been a lot of discussion in this TB.Com itself. Still a few threads are having this discussion inter alia during discussing other topics.
Naturally, as for any topic, there were(and are) two or more sides. One supporting the acceptability and credibility of astrology(horoscope based prediction / matching) and the other rejecting it and calling it a hoax. Others may fall somewhere in between this in varying degrees of proximity .
The main reason for this, there are no uniformily verifiable proof on record,well established and indisputable, for anybody to check the veracity .
As many million words were spared in this site itself on this topic, I have a suggestion.
Why can't this site,or the members in a sub group or association take up a task of inviting all those interested /knowing/ practicing astrology ,to a common venue and give each astrologer a uniform set of various horoscopes, and ask them to state about the till date past and their future predictions about the "Jaataka", to occur on a pre-decided intervals of time gap (to enable to ascertain and verify).
A pre- decided set of parameters be given for prediction. The correctness in actual life of the jaataka ,on the "past" parameters should be correctly ascertained and kept in sealed boxes to be compared with answers given by the astrologers for the verification.
The future predictions should be verified by the unbiased panel of judges,with actual recordings of occurences in the individual's life.
This of course needs volunteers to come forward to share their personal matters in public. However, the parameters can be such that most of these will be anyway available in public.
As the statement about past can be immediately verified for their correctness, the viewers /public can have a fair amount of indicative signal if astrology can be accepted at least for a part value of credit it is given by believers.
Any on who is genuinely interested in astrology OR vehemently opposing the same should sincerely act towards this as it will help the many many who are now on either side or on the brink.
The actual modalities,improvements can be brought out by more discussion in this matter.
Greetings
PS: This post was first prepared and posted by me in a discussion in another thread. But,then I felt that it can be discussed as a separate thread. I hope members will give their inputs.. s k
Still more are the fence sitters,the confused, the 'take-only-favourable"s etc.
There have been a lot of discussion in this TB.Com itself. Still a few threads are having this discussion inter alia during discussing other topics.
Naturally, as for any topic, there were(and are) two or more sides. One supporting the acceptability and credibility of astrology(horoscope based prediction / matching) and the other rejecting it and calling it a hoax. Others may fall somewhere in between this in varying degrees of proximity .
The main reason for this, there are no uniformily verifiable proof on record,well established and indisputable, for anybody to check the veracity .
As many million words were spared in this site itself on this topic, I have a suggestion.
Why can't this site,or the members in a sub group or association take up a task of inviting all those interested /knowing/ practicing astrology ,to a common venue and give each astrologer a uniform set of various horoscopes, and ask them to state about the till date past and their future predictions about the "Jaataka", to occur on a pre-decided intervals of time gap (to enable to ascertain and verify).
A pre- decided set of parameters be given for prediction. The correctness in actual life of the jaataka ,on the "past" parameters should be correctly ascertained and kept in sealed boxes to be compared with answers given by the astrologers for the verification.
The future predictions should be verified by the unbiased panel of judges,with actual recordings of occurences in the individual's life.
This of course needs volunteers to come forward to share their personal matters in public. However, the parameters can be such that most of these will be anyway available in public.
As the statement about past can be immediately verified for their correctness, the viewers /public can have a fair amount of indicative signal if astrology can be accepted at least for a part value of credit it is given by believers.
Any on who is genuinely interested in astrology OR vehemently opposing the same should sincerely act towards this as it will help the many many who are now on either side or on the brink.
The actual modalities,improvements can be brought out by more discussion in this matter.
Greetings
PS: This post was first prepared and posted by me in a discussion in another thread. But,then I felt that it can be discussed as a separate thread. I hope members will give their inputs.. s k
Last edited by a moderator: