'Bhagvad Gita' faces 'extremist' branding, legal ban in Russia - 1 -
Bhagavadgeeta may be banned in Russia because it is seen as extremist literature. That's how orthodox hinduism appears from outside of the 'system'.
The church wants it and is pressurising the state; it is also happening in a european country. That shows how tolerant and secular christians and muslims are.
When ramanujam's essay on ramayana was just dropped from the syllabus, there was commotion. Now, I believe sangom saheb will object to the demand for the ban on printing/ distribution of gita. Let us see what happens when the church of russia wants to ban quran.
The last remnant of hindu families from pakistan are seeking asylum in india; our secular government is asking them to go back and face extinction.
Pope has signed a deal with the jews that the church will not convert the jews. Let him sign a deal with muslims to ban mutual conversion.
fyi, some sixty or so years ago Mahabharata including Gita, was not permitted in orthodox tabra houses and people who wanted to learn these had to go to parks or temple mandapams, just as it was for learning the mantras for "aparaprayoga". All the publicity and glorification of BG is subsequent only, at least among tabras of Travancore, imho.
Devotees in Tomsk, Siberia, are currently in court fighting an attempt by the Russian government’s Federal Security Service (FSB) to prove that Srila Prabhupada’s Bhagavad-gita As It Is is an extremist literature that should be banned.
sangom in his post #3:
The objection was only to Mahabharata and an exception used to be made for BG.
There was objection to BG also being learnt or recited in 'houses' because it was felt that BG will cause "kulanaaSam" as happened to the kurus. I know at least my (maternal) grandfather and his cousins adhering to this, but later one chithappa of my mother got very much attracted to Chinmayananda and his Gita interpretation etc., after that Chithappa settled down in Mumbai, late in his life.
Bhagavad Gita faces 'extremist' branding, ban in Russia - The Times of India
This is a ISKCON story, are we generalizing it. I know Indian government is a secular, and may not fight for Hindu rights, but they should join the fight for Indian right. I do not know the exact content of this version of the Gita. May be people more knowledgeable can explain the passages the "Russian Federal Security" finds objectionable.
I am not a ISKCON fan.
Talking it a step further is ISKCON a Hindu movement?
Krishna Not a Hindu God, Rathayatra Not Owned by Hindus
Please don't be afraid of myself objecting "to the demand for the ban on printing/ distribution of gita". But I am certainly against children below voting age being taught gita compulsorily as though it is such a great thing.
fyi, some sixty or so years ago Mahabharata including Gita, was not permitted in orthodox tabra houses and people who wanted to learn these had to go to parks or temple mandapams, just as it was for learning the mantras for "aparaprayoga". All the publicity and glorification of BG is subsequent only, at least among tabras of Travancore, imho.
Shri prasad,
Are we prepared to consider BG as some iskcon workbook or manual and remain unconcerned if BG is banned or restricted otherwise in Russia? If we are so prepared and admitting indirectly that there is extremism in hindu religion also, then there is no problem at all.
I do not know the details. I would not jump to the conclusion that all versions of BG is banned. So please take a moment and read the fine print please.If the ISKCON version that preached some antisocial message, it should be banned in any society.
Sir Sangom,
I do not know how much you know of ISKCON. Just because they claim they follow BG. My experience with ISKCON is that it is a cult. I do not agree with their interpretation of Hinduism. I used to visit ISKCON temple as it was near my hostel in London. They tried to convert me, LOL.
I was also embarrassed by their antics in the air ports harassing travelers, and chanting on the streets in their garbs.
I do not know the details. I would not jump to the conclusion that all versions of BG is banned. So please take a moment and read the fine print please.
The problem with running a partial story, is that we come to wrong conclusions.
I come from the family where Gita was chanted frequently. We all used to follow Chinmayananda too. I used to attend Gita class from very young age.
Shri Prasad,
I am aware of iskcon right from its inception in US by BVPP. It had and it has all the characteristics of a cult. BVPP was a gaudiya monk. That gaudiya vaishnavism did not have much following in India was perhaps one reason which made the acharya to abide by "go west, young man" during the 1960's though he was no longer young then!
I am more than well aware of iskcon's cons because my wife's cousin has been, somehow, lured by the cult and he has been lost, irretrievably - to his wife and son, as well as suffering mother!
Can someone compare and contrast the translation of this ISKCON person to that of the "TRADITONAL" translation of BG prevalent in India?
The prosecutor, it seems, claims that this translation is "intolerant" of other religious sensitivities in Russia!
A Secular Russia aims to keep the population "not fired up" on religious issue!
That's their job, I suppose.
I am very eager to know MORE of the proceedings and the final verdict, and the logic of everything.
Cheers.
![]()
Y, this is an important point that is being missed I think. Here is an ISKCON follower holding a sign, "Don't ban BG". The Hindu reports today that Lalu took to the floor of the parliament and thundered, "We will not tolerate any move to insult Lord Krishna, [it is a] conspiracy against Lord Krishna".....The prosecutor, it seems, claims that this translation is "intolerant" of other religious sensitivities in Russia!
Iyyarooraan, all the reports are about a court case asking for the book "Bhagavad-gita As It Is" by A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada to be banned. There is no mention that the opposition is to BG itself. I am puzzled why you think "BG is opposed". Is there anything in the news to suggest this?I think BG is opposed because ISKCON is propagating it.
Iyyarooraan, all the reports are about a court case asking for the book "Bhagavad-gita As It Is" by A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada to be banned. There is no mention that the opposition is to BG itself. I am puzzled why you think "BG is opposed". Is there anything in the news to suggest this?
Cheers!
Narayan, the former is a commentary some 400+ pages long giving a Gaudia Vaishnava interpretation to BG, whereas, the later is the original text that may run to some 50 odd pages in print. Unless Prabhupada's BG As It Is is the only book on BG available anywhere in Russia, banning it cannot mean banning BG itself, or any of its other translations.Is there much difference between Prabhupada's BG as it is and BG? There may be minor variances, but no major ones. So one ban leads to another, is it not?
Precisely, I have been scouring the web to see any news report that gives a full and accurate account, but, unfortunately, all accounts are somewhat ambiguous.It did not come out that the ban was only for Prabhupada's brand alone and not the other ones. ISKCON guys are defending the suit in Serbia, so may be it appears that only Prabhupada's BG is only being banned.
BTW, the Indian government bans many books on the grounds of avoiding hurt to religious sentiments, the most well known among them is The Satanic Verses by Salman Rushdie. Nobody took to the streets demanding these books are not banned. If Indian government can ban books, why not Russian government?
Just so I am not misunderstood, I am against censorship. This prosecutor is misguided to try to ban this book because some people may get hurt. It is as ridiculous as Lalu claiming Krishna is being insulted.
Cheers!