i too agree. My opinion is this.
1. Except among tamil brahmins, there is no deep divide between saivites and
vaishnavites, amongst brahmins speaking other indian languages.
2. Again, those who follow saiva siddantham (esp. Mudaliars and pillais) feel that
brahmins are not part of tamil society, precisely for the reason that we don't
accord prominence to tamil literary works which propagated bhakthi those days
and were powerful and influential amongst all sections of the society. Remember,
cultural and spiritual renaissance was made possible only from south india, that too
tamilnadu, in 7th and 8th century a.d. Adi sankara, ramanuja, other nayanmars
and alwars were from our state. (kerala was chera naadu in those days).
3. I feel somehow during the last 5 centuries or so, we were emotionally attached to
sanskrit only, thereby slowly leaving tamil in our devotional activities, indirectly
proving the aryan-dravidian concept.
4. In vaishnava sampradaya, those who recite divya prabhandham go first, followed
by (the idols of) lord srinivasa and lakshmi, followed by those who recite vedas.
So much of importance is given to divya prabhandham that it is called dravida
vedam.
5. Every tamil brahmin, particularly smarthas, must come forward to revive the old
tradition and practice. As i have been repeatedly writing, tamil is no way inferior
to sanskrit. Sanskrit alone is not deva basha. Every one can worship, interact
with god in one's own language. That only brings the devotee closer to the lord
and develops intimacy between them.
6. As i have observed, no other language in the world, i can swear, contains so
much of bakthi literature in great abundance, than sanskrit and tamil (in equal
measure). (perhaps, too much of bakthi only produced 'nihilism' in tamilnadu
alone in south india).
7. Let us not feel shy to call ourselves 'tamil brahmins'.
thamizhan endru sollada; thalai nimirndhu nillada!