Dear Prasad,
I give here the explanation as gathered from learned elders. I have presumed that you are talking about the anthropomorphous Dwarapalakas (with human features-in simple English). The dwarapalakas represent a stage in the spiritual progress of an Atma. There are saamipyam, saarupyam and saayujyam which are considered to be the three important milestones in the atma's progress. Saamipyam occurs when you reach Vaikuntha finally and you are near the God. Saarupyam is getting a look which is similar to that of the paramatma. This occurs quite early in the journey depending on how intense is your bhakthi. The more you think about Paramatma and the more you yearn for reaching him you get the features and look of the paramatma himself. That is why you find the Dwarapalakas in the Temples looking like the presiding deity itself with conch and disk and four hands, kireetam, the satvik look etc., The Dwarapalaka has virtually become the God himself because of his constant bhakthi without break (like the flow of oil-thaila dhara). As a dwarapalaka, it is his duty also to constantly think about his master and nothing else. So dwarapalakas are an example of the soul which has crossed the Saarupya milestone.The last stage is the Sayujyam when you realise the final truth that you are what you are because of God in you. This is the final summum bonum of the Atma's journey. Next time when you go to the temple with your son/daughter and when he/she asks you the question tell him/her that the dwarapalaka is doing the duty assigned to him well and that is why he looks as rich and powerful as his master inside. In our dharma everything has a meaning. As dwarapalakas tell you this truth they are needed to stand there in the temples.
Cheers.
What about the dwarapalakas like in the picture? I have seen it in Shiva, Murugan, Ganesh, and even in Devi temples. These Dwarapalakas look more like bouncers, rather than the Deity inside.
Raju, I have no comment on dwarapalakas, but your explanation of saamipyam, saaroopyam, and saayujyam, particularly when and where it occurs, seems kind of novel to me, i.e. if you think you are presenting orthodox SV view. I may be wrong though, so may I request you to provide some textual reference for the view you have presented?.... Saamipyam occurs when you reach Vaikuntha finally and you are near the God.
Thank you, that explains the Vishnu temple dwarapalakas. What about the dwarapalakas like in the picture? I have seen it in Shiva, Murugan, Ganesh, and even in Devi temples. These Dwarapalakas look more like bouncers, rather than the Deity inside.
Raju, I have no comment on dwarapalakas, but your explanation of saamipyam, saaroopyam, and saayujyam, particularly when and where it occurs, seems kind of novel to me, i.e. if you think you are presenting orthodox SV view. I may be wrong though, so may I request you to provide some textual reference for the view you have presented?
.... I do not know what you think. .
dear nara !Raju, here is what I have heard and understood. SVs talk about four states, Salokyam, Sameepyam, Saroopyam and Sayujyam. I am sure you are familiar with what they mean, but for others who may not be aware, these four terms mean, (i) same loka, (ii) proximity, (iii) similarity in form, and (iv) inseparable union.
Some people claim all four states individually mean Sri Vaikuntam which Swami Sri Desikan rejects. Salokyam means one is residing in one of the Vishnu Lokas like Vishnu Lokam, golokam, or Thirupparkadal, not necessarily Sri Vaikuntam. To be sameepyam one has to be in Salokyam and in addition be in close proximity to Sriman Narayana. This can happen in any of the Vishnu lokas, not necessarily in Sri Vaikuntam. To be saroopyam, one has to be sameepyam and have similar -- not same -- form. But Sayujyam, the inseparable union can occur only in Sri Vaikuntam. This is why the unknown author of Jitante Sthotram asks for Sayujyam while rejecting Salokyam, Saroopyam in Shloka 2.36.
मोक्षं सालोक्य-सारूप्यं प्रार्थये न कदाचन ।
इ्च्छमहम महाबाहो साय्ज्यं तव सुव्रत ॥
moksham sAlokyam-sArUpyam prArthayE na kadAcana |
ichChAmyaham mahAbAho sAyujyam tava suvrata ||
Free translation:
I pray not for Salokyam or Sarupyam kind of moksham, but the moksham of Sayujyam is what I desire.
Here, Swami Sri Desikan states the term moksham used for Salokyam, Sameepyam, and Saroopyam is more a upachara (embelishment) to show these states are great too and must not be taken literally. True moksham is to be found only in Sayujyam.
Badda jeevas and prapannas can't enjoy any of these four states as they are in in bhU lokam.
This is my understanding. I may have read you wrong, but I thought you were saying some of these states can be enjoyed even in Bhu Loka which is contrary to my understanding of what these terms mean to SVs. This is why I asked whether your understanding is based on any text.
Cheers!
Every opinion based on scientific criticism I welcome. As to prejudices .. to which I have never made concessions ... “Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti.” -- Karl Marx
You seem to have an Ad Blocker on.
We depend on advertising to keep our content free for you. Please consider whitelisting us in your ad blocker so that we can continue to provide the content you have come here to enjoy.
Alternatively, consider upgrading your account to enjoy an ad-free experience along with numerous other benefits. To upgrade your account, please visit the account upgrades page
You can also donate financially if you can. Please Click Here on how you can do that.