Dear Goundamani
I enjoy our conversation. I hope you don't mind if I make some strong statments of my own and hope you don't take any offence. I have profound respect for your desire to bring equality to all people and I share this desire but from a different angle.[/quote}
Not at all, madam.I wont take offense in any debates.If from my previous posts,it looked as if I took offense, my profound aplogies for that.
I think it's the duty of the Brahmin to understand his traditions and history, not write it all off as superstition. This is the way ahead. The whole world comes to India because we are the only culture that continuos an ancient tradition that has died off everywhere in Ancient Egypt and Babylon, among the Greeks and Romans etc. If Fritz Stahl did not go to Kerala and study the living Brahmin tradition, the west would never have uncovered their own Pagan revival with the knowledge of yagna bringing life to Kabbalistic, Druid, and Runic western mysteries. Some mysteries need to be unlocked.
It is not only the duty of brahmins, but the duty of all human beings to understand their tradition, history and to
learn to remove the bad traditions and follow good traditions.Most important than following tradition,he should set a good tradition for future generations to follow.
The Dinosaur way is to not study deeply and gain understanding. The Dinosaur had the brain size of a walnut and could not grasp the concept of climate change that we humans today are only beginning to understand. We will bring many traditional Brahmins to the west to start agraharam communities here so that many scientists can study this spiritual energy. Crossing the sea is not against Brahminism as it is actually recommended to Brahmins in Taitreya Brahmana which is scripture and supersedes any Smitri (non-scripture) you try to quote.
I am not trying to quote any scripture.But I know that the generation which refused to travel across occean for the past thousands of years did so because they believed that scriptures prevent people from travelling across occeans.The current generation wants to travel across occean because, it beleives that scriptures actually recommend people to travel across occeans.:thumb:
One of you is certainly wrong according to scriptures ,but I dont care to find out who that is.But one of you is certainly wrong according to logic and rational thinking, and I believe that it's the previous generation.Refusing to travel across occeans is utter stupidity.So I do enocurage you all to travel across occeans,not because scriptues say so, but because common sense says so.
But my happiness vanished after I read your reasons.You want to set up agraharams in west so that westeners can study spiritual energy.First ofall except some professors in departments of culture, anthropology and occoult studies very few are interested in such research.So I am afraid that not many takers are there for studying spiritual energy.And next it is impossible to set up agraharams in west.Here anybody can buy a house anywhere and hence you might find many african americans, whites, hispanics,jews, hyderabadis(they are everywhere
and mcdonalds' , steakhouses and burgerkings in the western agraharms
And I am afraid that following agraharams, slums,vellalar kudiyiruppus all will come to west.But it might be a good idea to punish west by exporting casteism,our foreign affairs ministry should defenitely consider it.:thumb:
I think you mix up association with untouchability. If you have a son in college, do you wish him to associate with the ones who do drugs, like to drink too much, smoke cigarretes and ganja, look at pornography, etc... or would you like him to associate with people who have clean habits, are studious, believe in fair play, and hold friendship above success? This second group will make your son a Rama while the first will make him a Ravana.
Agreed.In this case I will advise him as "mix with good people and not with bad people"
This is
not equal to "mix only with brahmins and not with lower castes"
Do you see the difference between both statements?
Good people can come from any caste.So any father will say "mix equally with good people from all castes and avoid bad people from all castes".
Do you agree on this point?
Untouchability and Sex
If you really respect a woman you will not touch her. A woman has a right as to who she allows to touch her and who she doesn't allow to touch her. It does not mean that she looks down on men.
You are misinformed madam.Nobody is asking that dalit men should have the rights to touch uppercaste women,thats a total misunderstanding of the point.
To cite an example If a woman says "Among my friends only brahmin girls can touch me.dalit girl friends of mine should not touch me" that is untouchability.
If a woman says "In this bus only a brahmin woman can sit next to me and not any other caste women" thats untouchability.
If a woman says "no dalit man should touch me" that will be really hilarious. It's understood that no man shall touch a woman without her permission irrespective of his or her caste.
Nobody argues that all men should have the right to touch all women.Thats a total misunderstanding of the issue in hand.
The Right of Individuals
Any individual has a right to live according to what they wish and that right should be extended to Brahmins.
Nobody has the right to live as they
wish. People have to live
according to the law and not according to their wishes and whims and fancies.
There is no hate. Only respect. I respect them for their choices. Let all people be free to live as they choose.
Let people live as they choose,while obeying the law.I hope that you would agree that people can live freely as long as they obey the law.Untouchability is legally a crime and people who practice it automatically become law breakers.People cannot be permitted to break the law,can they?
Brahminism is the true light of Hinduism. One does not need varna system to exist to preserve Brahmanism. All one needs is to preserve the bloodlines of the Brahmins. The only way to end Brahminism is genocide and now that Brahmins are scattered all over the world, that notion is impossible.
Do you really think that bhramanism can only be ended through genocide?Can it not be ended through cultivating a rational thinking brain among the proponents of varnashrama?All we need is to open the eyes of people about the evils of caste system and spread a message of love and compassion.
Preserving bloodline?What is there to preserve in blood?What comes by blood?All men came from monkeys and its some ancient monkeys' bloodline which runs through all of us.
Any Brahmin son who is decendent of one of the gotras associated with the Rishis who are associated with the stars of the Great Bear constellation can re-awaken his Brahma Tejas by doing Sandhyavandanam for one month. If the fire cannot exist in public, it will continue to exist in secret under the cloak of secret societies (as groups in the past have done in the west when oppressed by the Church.)
People can believe in anything they want.If anybody believes that he can awaken the 'bhramma dejas' because of his ancestors,he deserves my pity and nothing more.
Nobody prevents the fire from existing in public.This is a free and democratic world.You are mistaken in this issue.People can live as they want as long as they respect the law.Nobody argues for compulsarily preventing people from reawakening their 'bhramma dejas by realizing the nobleness of their pure bloodline'.All that the law says is 'Dont discriminate, dont practice untouchability, let people who want to do love marriages freely do so, let people who want to do arranged marriages do so"-that's it. Reformers create awareness among people about usefulness of love marriages for destruction of caste system and demolition of varnashrama for the welfare of our nation. Thankfully society is changing nowadays.
Brahmins are not equivelant to Mullahs. Brahmins do not give themselves that kind of power. Brahmins traditionally did not have military power or the power to run society, that was given to the Kshatriya. Brahmin did not have the wealth in Society, that was given to Vaisya. Brahmins don't declare themselves to be the only mediator between the gods and man. They have openly said in all ancient literature that anyone can be mediator. Brahmins simply carry a torch. They carry the ancient vibrational power of ancient rishis and dutifully keep this homam alive through many centuries for the benefit of whoever wishes to have it.
All brahmins are not equal to mullahs.There are millions of kind and noble brahmins.But among them some ultra-orthodox people still exist, who are worse than any jihadi mullah.Their religious fanatacism and casteist mindset will match that of any lunatic crusader's or jihadi talibanistic mullah's mindset.
Hitler argued about the purity of aryan bloodline over other barbarian races.He ruined an entire generation of europe.Think about the hundreds of generations which were ruined in India due to varnashrama?