• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Theory and Practice of Karma: Some Salient Features

Status
Not open for further replies.
Theory and Practice of Karma: Some Salient Features

There are three divisions of Karma: Prarabdha, Sanchita and Agami.

Prarabdha: Everyone performs a lot of karma in the present and previous lives. Only a certain fraction of this karma is chosen by God in order to form the blueprint of our next birth. In this way, the karma brought over from the previous births, which determines our present birth, is known as prarabdha karma.

Sanchita: All the karma of our previous births which remains after prarabdha has been taken out is known as sanchita karma.

Agami: This is karma that one accumulates during the present birth. At the moment of death, this joins the sanchita karma and next birth is determined by a fraction of karma taken out from this sum. The fruit that one experiences in this birth is due to prarabdha and a portion of the present agami. Though prarabdha is exhausted fully by the time of death, only a fraction of Agami is used now, and the rest is added to sanchita at death.

Question: This refers only to the karma of human beings. What about the karma of animals?

Reply: There is no agami karma for animals. They have only prarabdha and sanchita karma. The jiva born as an animal spends only his papa karma, which caused him the animal life in the first place. In other words, he experiences only his prarabdha karma. For example, a tiger does not accrue papa by killing a cow. Similarly, a fish in the Ganga does not accrue punya because of always living in Ganga. After spending this karma, they go back as human beings; their future birth being again determined by a fraction of the remaining sanchita karma.

An Important Question: Is it possible to change one’s karma or one necessarily has to experience its fruit?

Answer: Karma can certainly be changed by another karma, which is its antidote. A good karma can be annulled by a bad karma and a bad one by a good one. Whenever prarabdha shows up through a pleasant result, it is punya and and the one ending up in grief, is papa. The moment there is grief, we would like to annul that papa. The karma required for this is prayashchitta. It has mainly three components viz japa, dana and upavasa. Prayashchitta differs only in the quality and quantity of these three aspects. One may have to do more upavasa or less upavasa, do this dana or that dana or do this japa or that japa and so on. Upavasa and dana cannot be done by everybody. A diabetic patient or a person with stomach ulcer cannot do upavasa. A poor man cannot do dana. But there is no such constraint on japa. The rishis relax the rules of japa to facilitate anybody to do it. If one cannot squat, one can sit on a chair and even if that is not possible, one may lie down and do japa.Therefore, everyone, for everything - either to get rid of papa or acquire punya, should resort to japa.

Doubt: But many times, even after doing prayashchitta and punya karma, one may not be rewarded. Sometimes we also hear that prarabdha cannot be got rid of. It has to be spent through. Can you explain this?



Resolution:
Prarabdha is after all our own karma done during previous lives. Of course, we do not know how much or what exactly it is. Nevertheless, it has to be experienced. But it is possible to rectify it through prayashchitta. For example, Markandeya, who had to die at the age of 8 due to his prarabdha, overcame it through tapasya and lived long.



Savitri, whose prarabdha destined her for widowhood, overcame it by tapasya.

But many times common people will not be able to do that kind of tapasya necessary to overcome the prarabdha. Because we are ignorant of the amount of prarabdha, its annulment is to be seen only after the present tapasya overcomes it. The tapasya may be lacking in its quality or quantity or both. Bhagawan Vyasa says that for the full result of the karma to manifest, three things are necessary. They are: concentration of mind, correctness in the performance of karma and dana. Sometimes, when we do not succeed, it would be wrong to conclude that prarabdha cannot be mitigated. We have to step up only the quality and quantity of the tapasya.

Remaining Doubt: Then how to understand the statement that prarabdha should unavoidably be experienced?

Answer: It is like this: The trouble that one undergoes during tapasya will itself account for the grief to be experienced due to prarabdha.

Question: Then which is better - experiencing prarabdha as such without any prayashchitta or experiencing it through the prayashchitta to overcome the prarabdha?

Answer: It depends upon one’s attitude. People with vairagya who are concentrating on moksha, experience the prarabdha and do not bother to have prayashchitta. This amounts to undergoing pain voluntarily for a higher cause. Therefore, this itself is tapasya. But common people should not do like that. They have various duties to attend to. Therefore, they should overcome it by doing the tapasya of prayashchitta. This will not only mitigate grief but also increase faith in God.


This article is based almost entirely on the teachings of Pujya Swami Paramanand Bharati Ji. However, any errors are entirely the author's own.


References & Further Reading:


Theory and Practice of Karma: Some Salient Features
 
Question: This refers only to the karma of human beings. What about the karma of animals?

Reply: There is no agami karma for animals. They have only prarabdha and sanchita karma. The jiva born as an animal spends only his papa karma, which caused him the animal life in the first place. In other words, he experiences only his prarabdha karma. For example, a tiger does not accrue papa by killing a cow. Similarly, a fish in the Ganga does not accrue punya because of always living in Ganga. After spending this karma, they go back as human beings; their future birth being again determined by a fraction of the remaining sanchita karma.


Theory and Practice of Karma: Some Salient Features


I find this demeaning to animals..cos it makes it sound as if being an animal is a sin to start with.

If being an animal is a sin then why all the big fuss about a cow being sacred?

Going by the Karma logic a cow too has some papa karma and so does a monkey or a baboon or a hog..so why only VIP treatment given to a cow in Hinduism when they cow too is obviously having some papa karma.

Are we trying to say that a cow has a better karma than a monkey?

So who keeps this Animal Planet Karmic records? Akashic records?


I think its high time we stop seeing Punyam and Papam and degrade animals who are clearly better off than us humans in terms of Dharma.

How are we so sure that a fish swimming in Ganga does not accrue good karma?

If the fish is a fish becos of a papa karma so why can't he too accrue good karma?

So which part of Karma determines if a fish swims in Ganga or swims in a sewerage pond?

We really do not know!

So many saints sing songs that they want to be a stone in a temple..they want to be a tree in Brindavan..they all sing to be non human subjects..poor saints they dont know that even a fish in Ganga accrues no punyam.




Its better off if they sing :

Na Punyam Na Papam Na Saukhyam Na Dukham
Na Mantro Na Teertham Na Veda Na Yajnaha
Aham Bhojanam Naiva Bhojyam Na Bhokta
Chidananda Rupa Shivoham Shivoham
 
Last edited:
The opening post is very informative and seems to be logically laid out.

It appears animals do not have free will and hence cannot commit crime or good deeds willfully. They just follow their instincts I guess in a programmed way.

Some animals do have fun in America. The pet food business and pet health care business is several tens of billion dollar business in USA alone. People walk the dogs (rather the dogs walk them) and they pick up its crap in plastic bag and carry in their purse to dispose at home. Many dogs and cats are treated better than children. Overall animals do suffer due to human animal.
 
The opening post is very informative and seems to be logically laid out.

It appears animals do not have free will and hence cannot commit crime or good deeds willfully. They just follow their instincts I guess in a programmed way.

Well Said Sir

Thanks
 
Sri PJ - Thanks for the post.

Actually back in late 1980s and early 1990s, Swami Paramananda Bharati used to visit USA. I have talked to him a few times and have attended his public lectures. He used to be a Professor at IIT (Madras?) and chose Sannyasi lifestyle back in mid-1980s. I had lost touch over the decades as to what happened to him until I saw this thread. It is nice to know he has written a few books on key topics. I had an opportunity to read one of his first books ever translated from Kannada to English back in 1992 or so.

The article quoted is nicely done though technically a few points are not precise.
The Karma model is abstracted from scant references in the Upanishads , few statements in Sri Sankara Bhashya and some common sense reasoning. It is still a belief based model but wrong emphasis (internally inconsistent statement) could lead one to wrong actions.

Being that Jiva/Avidya is beginningless and the time is cyclical in our thinking the accrued Sanchita Karma is limitless (infinite). This can never be exhausted by anyone in any number of lifetimes. The relief happens by way of disowning of both Punya and Papa. This point did not come out in the article.

I know there had been discussions in the past about this topic. There are people who go along with suffering thinking that is the only way to exhaust the Karmas. Nothing could be farther from the truth and is not aligned with what is taught in our scriptures.

Our teaching emphasizes that there is no reason for sorrow and suffering even as the Prarabdha Karma unfolds with the bank balance of Sanchita Karma being limitless ..
 
Last edited:
The concept of karma entered Hinduism through ancient non-vedic sects such as Saivism and Bhagavatism and the old Samkhya school. Saivism recognized karma as one of the three impurities[SUP] [/SUP]responsible for the bondage of individual souls. It emphasized that only by the grace of Siva or a guru who had realized Him, individual souls could free themselves from the impurities and attain liberation. For a considerable period of time, ancient religious sects of India debated on the question of whether it was fate or free will which shaped the lives of people upon earth. Those who believed in fatalism, such as the followers of Ajivikas, argued that everything in the world was predetermined and that there was nothing an individual could do other than accepting his lot passively and following the order of things (niyati) as they were. Those who believed in karma argued that man was endowed with free will and that he could change the course of his life, if he wanted, through his actions. They believed that desire ridden and egoistic thoughts and actions were responsible for the suffering of individual souls and their corporeal existence. According to them fate was a product of one's own actions and what might look like the intervention of chance in case of some individuals was actually a result of their previous actions done either in their present lives or in their previous ones.
It was the latter opinion that gained ground through the popularity of Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism. Even Sikhism, which is the most recent of all Indian religions, accepts karma as an inseparable reality of earthly life. Today if there is one concept that is deeply ingrained in the consciousness of Hindus, and for that matter a vast number of Indians, and influences their thinking and actions so deeply, it is undoubtedly the concept of Karma.They may not think of it constantly while they perform their daily chores, but it is there, deep in their subconscious minds, like a self-regulating mechanism, influencing their lives and actions. Hindus believe in the inviolable law of karma and its binding nature. Whether they are literate or illiterate, they honor it and respect it. It makes them feel responsible for their lives and accept their lot rather poignantly.

http://hinduwebsite.com/conceptofkarma.asp
 
I have serious priblem with the following paragraph of OP.
Prarabdha: Everyone performs a lot of karma in the present and previous lives. Only a certain fraction of this karma is chosen by God in order to form the blueprint of our next birth. In this way, the karma brought over from the previous births, which determines our present birth, is known as prarabdha karma.

Karma, for these reasons, naturally implies reincarnation since thoughts and deeds in past lives will affect one's current situation. Thus, humanity (through a sort of collective karma) and individuals alike are responsible for the tragedies and good 'fortunes' which they experience. The concept of an inscrutable "God" figure is not necessary with the idea of karma. It is vital to note that karma is not an instrument of a god, or a single God, but is rather the physical and spiritual 'physics' of being. As gravity governs the motions of heavenly bodies and objects on the surface of the earth, karma governs the motions and happenings of life, both inanimate and animate, unconscious and conscious, in the cosmic realm.

God collecting all karmas of all creatures in the universe and then deciding the reward and punishment is against the basic tenets of Karma. If there is a God sitting in judgement of soul then there can be no impartial God, The Brahman is not activist GOD.
 
Last edited:
[FONT=&quot]Since Karma is a universal law it does not work on consciousness. In other words it does not dictate what deeds are more positive than others, or what deeds are more negative than others. It works simply on the Law Of Cause And Effect.

In order to explain how the effects of past actions of man are preserved in the atman after the death of the body and how these effects produce their fruit in a future rebirth, the Hindu theologians make a distinction between two types of body: the gross body (sthula-sarira) and the subtle body (sukshma-sarira or linga- sarira). The gross body is that which is visible and tangible, consists of the eternal senses, of organs, etc. The subtle body, instead, is not visible nor tangible, and is composed of subtle elements, like: budclhi (intelligence), manas (mind), ahamkara (ego), etc. The subtle body encircles the atman and serves as a connection between the soul and the gross body. Every action of man leaves its imprint (samskara) on the subtle body and remains as a seed, which has to mature and produce in due, time its proper fruit. While the gross body disintegrates at death, the spirit continues to be in contact with the subtle psychic body which it carries forward. The subtle body together with all the tendencies, merits or effects of karma is said to migrate with the soul (atman) at death.[/FONT]
 
Last edited:
Hinduism also asserts that divinity is equally present in every soul, whether that be in a human or a subhuman body. Otherwise it goes against the idea of God’s omnipresence.
Hindu Concept of Reincarnation | Vedanta Society of Western Washington


In the life we see in this world, we work to get the results. The work is the action and the result is fruit of it. This is exactly what is karma. The fruit may come in a minute in a day, in a week, in a year or much much later that the delay may even make one forget the action that triggered the fruit got ! If there is no correlation between the action and the fruit, won't the world be in a mess ?! This theory would also explain why unexpected things happen - either good or bad. (As the situation undergoing due to the function of various past deeds.)
The reincarnation (in conjunction with karma) explains why some people never gets to see the fruits of their action in their life time and why some children die when they have committed no sin. When the karma exist one would have to undergo the fruits of it for which one may have to go through multiple births in multiple forms - plants, animals... The bank doesn't let you go unless the account is settled.

http://www.shaivam.org/hipkarma.htm
 
Last edited:
I have serious priblem with the following paragraph of OP.


Karma, for these reasons, naturally implies reincarnation since thoughts and deeds in past lives will affect one's current situation. Thus, humanity (through a sort of collective karma) and individuals alike are responsible for the tragedies and good 'fortunes' which they experience. The concept of an inscrutable "God" figure is not necessary with the idea of karma. It is vital to note that karma is not an instrument of a god, or a single God, but is rather the physical and spiritual 'physics' of being. As gravity governs the motions of heavenly bodies and objects on the surface of the earth, karma governs the motions and happenings of life, both inanimate and animate, unconscious and conscious, in the cosmic realm.

God collecting all karmas of all creatures in the universe and then deciding the reward and punishment is against the basic tenets of Karma. If there is a God sitting in judgement of soul then there can be no impartial God, The Brahman is not activist GOD.



The issue with most explanations in this area comes from incompleteness, lack of precision, limitation of translation and other issues arising when someone tries to oversimplify.

There are elaborate and well founded thought process to explain why Isvara (not using word God here) may be described as Karma-Phala-Dhatha. That is the meaning implied here where Isvara is the embodiment of the laws of 'spiritual physics'
 
Since Karma is a universal law it does not work on consciousness. In other words it does not dictate what deeds are more positive than others, or what deeds are more negative than others. It works simply on the Law Of Cause And Effect.

In order to explain how the effects of past actions of man are preserved in the atman after the death of the body and how these effects produce their fruit in a future rebirth, the Hindu theologians make a distinction between two types of body: the gross body (sthula-sarira) and the subtle body (sukshma-sarira or linga- sarira). The gross body is that which is visible and tangible, consists of the eternal senses, of organs, etc. The subtle body, instead, is not visible nor tangible, and is composed of subtle elements, like: budclhi (intelligence), manas (mind), ahamkara (ego), etc. The subtle body encircles the atman and serves as a connection between the soul and the gross body. Every action of man leaves its imprint (samskara) on the subtle body and remains as a seed, which has to mature and produce in due, time its proper fruit. While the gross body disintegrates at death, the spirit continues to be in contact with the subtle psychic body which it carries forward. The subtle body together with all the tendencies, merits or effects of karma is said to migrate with the soul (atman) at death.

My personal view, arrived at after much contemplation, is that most of our religious and philosophical treatises were not able to break free from an "Atman-fixation" probably because, they just could not wipe out from their minds/intellects, the concept of one jeeva for each physical body/individual. It may also be that our ancient seers, in their superior wisdom, thought that this "one person—one jeeva" concept will make, at least to some extent, people feel responsible for their own words, thoughts and actions and consequently make them strive towards avoiding patently bad karmas and try simultaneously to increase their good karmas, earn more and more Punya and thus, eventually get Moksha or liberation from the cycle of births and deaths in this world.

Nevertheless humans have the innate tendency to be attracted by the apparently glorious comforts and pleasures, the vast riches, etc., possible in this world and these make them commit Karmas of every hue at all times, from birth to death. According to our authoritative texts, these Karmas cause each jeeva to take rebirth and this goes on endlessly, causing this Samsaara.

It however appears to me that the individual jeeva concept is not necessary. Karmas constitute a universal "Field" of their own and the Universal Consciousness (Parabrahman) gets "overwritten", so to say, by the karmas for which each new birth happens. (The births happen as a result of the Kaama of the man and woman engaged in the reproductive act, but the "road map" of the life of the child to be born is determined by the exact Karmaphalas to be experienced. The Brahman resides within the person's body till the already scheduled Karmaphalas are experienced. The moment it is over, the Brahman or Life-giving energy leaves the phsical body and we call the left-over as a corpse.

What each one of us experiences is not the Karmaphalas of our very own past births, because we did not, in fact, have any previous births nor are we capable of another birth. But each of us is experiencing the phalas of certain Karmas from out of the universal stock of Karmas for which the phalas have had to be experienced yet. Simply put, one may be suffering greatly in his life because of the evil karmas done by X, Y and/or Z and have died. Similarly, the phalas of the good or bad karmas performed by one person will be experienced by a completely unrelated person. This can make us think, "why cannot I indulge in bad karmas to my mind's complete satisfaction, since I am not going to experience it at all?". That is a very valid pov. But if everyone starts thinking on these lines, the ultimate result will be that there will be no person free- even temporarily - from suffering and grief in this world. I feel the history of humanity follows this road-map only even though our ancient seers made the concept of individual jeevas, rebirths, different kinds of karmas, etc.

In short, it is the Brahman which goes through the different births and remains witness to all the sufferings, griefs, celebrations and joys in this world. It is very pertinent to consider what Gaudapada says in his Mandukya Karika—

From Gaudapada’s Karika – Vaithathya Prakarna – II.32
न निरोधो न चोत्पत्तिर्न बद्धो न च साधकः ।
न मुमुक्षुर्न वै मुक्त इत्येषा परमार्थता ॥ २।ख़्।३२॥


na nirodho na cotpattirna baddho na ca sādhakaḥ ।
na mumukṣurna vai mukta ityeṣā paramārthatā ॥ II.K.32॥
There is neither dissolution, nor birth; neither anyone in bondage, nor any aspirant for wisdom, neither can there be anyone who hankers after liberation, nor anyone liberated as such. This alone is the Supreme Truth. (II.K.32)

- Sri Gaudapada
 
That is true, P.J. ji! However when I wrote my thoughts, I was thinking of exploring further along the lines so as to give more food for the thought... I did not expect an outright denial of 'karmas'.
 
That is true, P.J. ji! However when I wrote my thoughts, I was thinking of exploring further along the lines so as to give more food for the thought... I did not expect an outright denial of 'karmas'.

Why care about who denies about your Views Smt JR Ji ?
 
Hi Sangom,

Sorry have to disagree with you !. If the Karmaphalas are distributed randomly or to different persons, then the “law of causation – cause & effect” will cease to exist. I am not sure how you arrived at this conclusion.

Current Karma theory perfectly fits into the “cause & effect” – every action has a reaction – which is either a positive or negative Karma which is carried forward across multiple life times by the same Jeeva (Soul) till it attains salvation.

This Karma effect can be seen in our own life times, when we struggle a lot, good times are around the corner & it comes. When we enjoy a lot, the bad times are around the corner & it comes. So as we struggle, the bad karmas are exhausted & the effect of Good Karma takes over. Similarly the case when we enjoy our lives.. this is not fatalism, this is the reality.

One can even test this in life – by voluntarily struggling in life – (our ancestors used to do penance, prayaschittam, etc. to gain power, prosperity in life), you can see the “good things” coming to life suddenly.

As I write this, let me highlight one case in particular which came in Nat Geo as a documentary, a British girl comes to Goa to “enjoy life to the fullest – LOL !!”, so she indulges in sex & drugs 24x7, & when she runs out of money, she starts smuggling cocaine by stuffing it in the Indian statues & couriering it across Europe – she is so addicted to this life, she doesn’t want to go back. One fine day, she gets caught & is put into Tihar Jail for 5 yrs. She hits such deep depression during this time, she tries to kill herself many times, & finally she gets out after 5 yrs & back in England now.. !!

so the current Karma theory is a excellent explanation to the many sufferings that otherwise we cannot explain...

Cheers,
 
Last edited:
My take –

Our scriptures talk about a number of different theories which are closely interlinked to the Karma theory which states that there is rebirth/ reincarnation of the same “Jeevas” (Soul) in different forms on Earth.

Many theories talk about how to access our previous lives & understand what happened in the past , & connect to what is happening today.

Akashic Records – All our past lives are recorded in the Universe as Akashic Records in a non-physical plane & there have been numerous instances of our Saints, & many westerners who have claimed to have accessed this to understand the past.

Universal Consciousness or Universal mind (manifestation of the Brahman) of Advaita– the premise is that all our human consciousness/minds can connect into this Universal consciousness. Universal consciousness pervades all forms, & knows everything.

So by tapping into the Universal consciousness/Akashic Records via meditation, etc.. one can know our past lives.

Apart from this, we have had many instances in life across different countries, where Kids have accurately described their past lives & researchers have proved these people existed in such places, with so & so names, etc… They have also investigated many life incidents that were only privy to the ones who lived that life.

No way to explain this unless the person was re-born as the Kid in this life OR the Kid was able to tap in to the Akashic Records/Universal Consciousness etc.. OR you have to just dismiss this without any explanation…

Karma theory is the only theory that can explain the otherwise “unexplainable” sufferings of the kids, animals, etc..

So our scriptures have a comprehensive view of the world, that explains all the events, happenings, disasters, etc.. & methods to access our past lives, etc.. apart from the karma theory itself.
 
Last edited:
Karma Comes Back Around for Man who Broke Religious Rule to Help Boy

Karma Comes Back Around for Man who Broke Religious Rule to Help Boy

Sikh-turban-bandage-karma-screenshot.jpg



One good deed has led to another for a man who broke a tenet of his religion to help a little boy hurt in an accident.


We told you earlier this week how, even though Sikhs are never supposed to take off their turbans in public, Harman Singh (right) removed his and used it to help an injured boy.



Sikh-removes-turban-accident-released-326x205.jpg



When a television news crew interviewed Singh later in his apartment, they noticed his empty rooms held very little furniture.


The staff at the station, spurred by comments from viewers, contacted a local furniture store owner and together they surprised Singh with a reward for his kindness. They showed up with a new bed, sofa, chair and coffee table.


Through tears, Mr. Singh, whose father died last year, said, “This the biggest surprise of my life.”
He said he knew his father would be proud of him, too.



Karma Comes Back Around for Man who Broke Religious Rule to Help Boy
 
It however appears to me that the individual jeeva concept is not necessary. Karmas constitute a universal "Field" of their own and the Universal Consciousness (Parabrahman) gets "overwritten", so to say, by the karmas for which each new birth happens. (The births happen as a result of the Kaama of the man and woman engaged in the reproductive act, but the "road map" of the life of the child to be born is determined by the exact Karmaphalas to be experienced. The Brahman resides within the person's body till the already scheduled Karmaphalas are experienced. The moment it is over, the Brahman or Life-giving energy leaves the phsical body and we call the left-over as a corpse.

What each one of us experiences is not the Karmaphalas of our very own past births, because we did not, in fact, have any previous births nor are we capable of another birth. But each of us is experiencing the phalas of certain Karmas from out of the universal stock of Karmas for which the phalas have had to be experienced yet. Simply put, one may be suffering greatly in his life because of the evil karmas done by X, Y and/or Z and have died. Similarly, the phalas of the good or bad karmas performed by one person will be experienced by a completely unrelated person. This can make us think, "why cannot I indulge in bad karmas to my mind's complete satisfaction, since I am not going to experience it at all?". That is a very valid pov. But if everyone starts thinking on these lines, the ultimate result will be that there will be no person free- even temporarily - from suffering and grief in this world. I feel the history of humanity follows this road-map only even though our ancient seers made the concept of individual jeevas, rebirths, different kinds of karmas, etc.

Sri Sangom,

Two or three additional points can help to appreciate your point better.

(a) If karma is a field of operation, why should it not affect the insentient or inanimate objects?

(b) Why is that the man has supremacy over karma in certain situations, like for example committing suicide or taking another's life by murder etc. ?

(c) Why should karma wait for a newborn to bring it to the field of karma? Why would it for instance not enter the existing life body, like someone in comma or have had a near fatal accident and prolong the same life ? In short, why it requires a new body to be an experiencer?

(d) If karma is a field of operation, would it not be logical for the newborn to be born with the state of knowledge prevailing in the field. That is, why should a newborn learn ABCD and 123 all over again and why is the memory blanked out at birth?
 
Sri zebra Sir

Thanks for your thoughts on this, I am sure Sri sangom, being a learned member here, will be able to answer you there by we will all know more about Karma Theory
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top