sanskrit grammar

[vikrama]

Share:

Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn WhatsApp Email Share Link

I find that the previous Sanskrit grammar thread has been closed. Hence this new thread. Could any body clear my doubt given below?

What are the verb forms of जागृ in लङ् in all the three purushas and three vachanas?

vikrama

 

[kaivalyam]

அஜாக: அஜாக்ருதாம் அஜாகரு: அஜாக: அஜாக்ருதம் அஜாக்ருத அஜாகரம் அஜாக்ருவ அஜாக்ரும.

 

[vikrama]

कैवल्य महोदय,
नमस्ते। धन्योस्मि।
विक्रमः

 

[renuka]

dear all,
i hope someone can clear my doubt.
i do not have devanagari font hence i will transliterate in english.

i have a doubt in TADDHITAS.
i understand the rules of grammar for denoting" descendent of"
for eg ragho: apatyam pumaan = raaghavah:
parvatasya apatyam stri = paarvatee
and so on for kaunteya, shaiva, vaishnava, karttikeya, vaasudeva, janaki etc

but whyis Dasharathasya apatyam pumaan = Daasharathih: and not DAASHARATHAH:

kindly illuminate my intellect
thanks

 

[kaivalyam]

The rules of taddhita are complex. For the examples you cite,

(1) General Rule:
'an' is used to form patronymic derivations.

(2) One exception to the above rule:
Words ending in short 'a'. These are derived through 'in'.

(3) Exception to (2):
Certain words like Shiva.

(4) Another exception to (2):
Descendents of Vrishni.

raghava: from raghu - ends in 'u'. Here only (1) applies.
kaunteya: derives from kunti - feminine stem(derives through 'dhak').
shaiva: See rule (3).
vaishnava: from vishnu - ends in 'u'. Only (1) applies.
kartikeya: derives from krittika - feminine stem(derives through 'dhak').
vaasudeva: Derives from vasudeva. See rule (4).
daasharathi: derives from dasharatha which ends in a short 'a'. See rule (1).

But somehow, 'pradiyatam daasharathaya maithili' comes to mind. daasharathaya clearly is the dative form of daasharatha. I don't how this derivation comes about though.

 

[tbs]

dear all,
i hope someone can clear my doubt.
i do not have devanagari font hence i will transliterate in english.

i have a doubt in TADDHITAS.
i understand the rules of grammar for denoting" descendent of"
for eg ragho: apatyam pumaan = raaghavah:
parvatasya apatyam stri = paarvatee
and so on for kaunteya, shaiva, vaishnava, karttikeya, vaasudeva, janaki etc

but whyis Dasharathasya apatyam pumaan = Daasharathih: and not DAASHARATHAH:

kindly illuminate my intellect
thanks

hi
may be like jamadagnsya apatyam pumaaan = jaamadadagni..
i heard daasarathaya vidmahe...in sri raama gayathri mantra
may be some vishesha paanini sutra might be applied...

regards
tbs