[h=1]Newly Developed Nanotech ‘Super Sponge’ Removes Mercury from Water in Less Than 5 Seconds Which Could Make Effective Toxic Cleanup of Lakes Possible in the Future[/h] March 25, 2017
Mercury is extremely toxic, can cause long-term health damage and is increasingly present in water due to ongoing pollution. Removing it from water is however not easy.
Professor Abdennour Abbas and his lab team from the University of Minnesota College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Sciences (CFANS) created a sponge to address this growing problem. Within seconds, the sponge can absorb mercury from a polluted water source.
The team used nanotechnology to develop a sponge that has outstanding mercury adsorption properties. Mercury contamination can now be removed to below detectable limits from tap and lake water in less than 5 seconds. It takes about 5 minutes to remove the mercury from industrial wastewater. The contamination is converted into a complex that is not toxic and the sponge can be disposed of in a landfill after use. The sponge also kills fungal and bacterial microbes.
After nanotechnology modifications, this ‘super-sponge’ catches mercury and kills microbes. (Image credit: Ke Xu, graduate student, CFANS) As an illustration, if Como Lake in St. Paul were contaminated with mercury at the EPA limit, a sponge the size of a basketball would be needed to remove all of the mercury.
This is an important development for the state of Minnesota. More than 66% of the waters on Minnesota’s 2004 Impaired Waters List are compromised as the mercury contamination in those waters ranges from 0.27 to 12.43 ng/L (the EPA limit is 2 ng/L).
The Minnesota Department of Health has had to establish fish consumption guidelines, as mercury contamination of lake waters leads to mercury accumulation in fish. It is advised that a number of fish species store bought or caught in Minnesota lakes should not be consumed more than once a week or even once a month.
Ten percent of tested newborns in Minnesota’s North Shore had mercury concentrations above the EPA reference dose for methylmercury, the type of mercury found in fish. This means that some pregnant women in Minnesota, and specifically in the Lake Superior region, are exposed to mercury at levels that must be reduced.
“Super-Sponge”
Image Credit: Ke Xu, graduate student, CFANS A reduced deposition of mercury is also projected to have economic benefits reflected by an annual state willingness to pay of $212 million in Minnesota alone. US-EPA forecasts show that reducing mercury emissions to the latest established effluent limit standards would result in 130,000 fewer asthma attacks, 11,000 fewer premature deaths and 4,700 fewer heart attacks each year. That translates to between $37 billion and $90 billion in annual monetized benefits.
The new technology would have an impact on inspiring new regulations in addition to improving aquatic life, air and water quality, and public health. Technology shapes regulations and this in turn determine the value of the market. It was estimated that the 2015 EPA Mercury and Air Toxics Standards regulation would cost the industry around $9.6 billion per annum by 2020. This cost could potentially be reduced by the new University of Minnesota technology and make it easy for the industry to meet regulatory requirements.
http://sciencenewsjournal.com/newly...ffective-toxic-cleanup-lakes-possible-future/
Mercury is extremely toxic, can cause long-term health damage and is increasingly present in water due to ongoing pollution. Removing it from water is however not easy.
Professor Abdennour Abbas and his lab team from the University of Minnesota College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Sciences (CFANS) created a sponge to address this growing problem. Within seconds, the sponge can absorb mercury from a polluted water source.
The team used nanotechnology to develop a sponge that has outstanding mercury adsorption properties. Mercury contamination can now be removed to below detectable limits from tap and lake water in less than 5 seconds. It takes about 5 minutes to remove the mercury from industrial wastewater. The contamination is converted into a complex that is not toxic and the sponge can be disposed of in a landfill after use. The sponge also kills fungal and bacterial microbes.
After nanotechnology modifications, this ‘super-sponge’ catches mercury and kills microbes. (Image credit: Ke Xu, graduate student, CFANS) As an illustration, if Como Lake in St. Paul were contaminated with mercury at the EPA limit, a sponge the size of a basketball would be needed to remove all of the mercury.This is an important development for the state of Minnesota. More than 66% of the waters on Minnesota’s 2004 Impaired Waters List are compromised as the mercury contamination in those waters ranges from 0.27 to 12.43 ng/L (the EPA limit is 2 ng/L).
The Minnesota Department of Health has had to establish fish consumption guidelines, as mercury contamination of lake waters leads to mercury accumulation in fish. It is advised that a number of fish species store bought or caught in Minnesota lakes should not be consumed more than once a week or even once a month.
Ten percent of tested newborns in Minnesota’s North Shore had mercury concentrations above the EPA reference dose for methylmercury, the type of mercury found in fish. This means that some pregnant women in Minnesota, and specifically in the Lake Superior region, are exposed to mercury at levels that must be reduced.
“Super-Sponge”Image Credit: Ke Xu, graduate student, CFANS A reduced deposition of mercury is also projected to have economic benefits reflected by an annual state willingness to pay of $212 million in Minnesota alone. US-EPA forecasts show that reducing mercury emissions to the latest established effluent limit standards would result in 130,000 fewer asthma attacks, 11,000 fewer premature deaths and 4,700 fewer heart attacks each year. That translates to between $37 billion and $90 billion in annual monetized benefits.
The new technology would have an impact on inspiring new regulations in addition to improving aquatic life, air and water quality, and public health. Technology shapes regulations and this in turn determine the value of the market. It was estimated that the 2015 EPA Mercury and Air Toxics Standards regulation would cost the industry around $9.6 billion per annum by 2020. This cost could potentially be reduced by the new University of Minnesota technology and make it easy for the industry to meet regulatory requirements.
http://sciencenewsjournal.com/newly...ffective-toxic-cleanup-lakes-possible-future/
