• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Introducing TamilBrahmins.com Classifieds - Connect, Engage, and Transact within our Community!
    A dedicated platform for the Tamil Brahmin community to connect and transact. Find matches, explore real estate, discover jobs, access education, connect with services, and engage in community events. Join us as we empower and foster growth within our community through our vibrant Classifieds.
    Learn More
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

How Lord Brahma is considered as Rajasic

Not open for further replies.
When you see other gods, they have killed demons except Lord Muruga, he didn't kill surapadma but killed tarakasura by destroying the mountain form of him. Lord Brahma never killed anybody. Onlly thing is according to scriptures he did the Panchama patakam (i.e grave sin of seeing with lust his daughter and shiva's wife).Even Lord vishnu or krisha lied for the protection of dharma and vishnu in order to kill one asura came in that form of asura to make the chaste wife of that asura to loose chastity.(brinda or tulsi).That's why in rama avatar he got the punishment. Even shiva did play with his nayanmars and devotees by telling some lies or doing mischief. Lord Brahma only gave boons to asuras and never killed anybody.How come Lord Brahma is considered as Rajasic when shiva (rudra) or vishnu exhibited all three gunas they were considered as satvic when telling about their supremacy.
There is no purana to substantiate brahma's rajasic quality (may be his lustful nature as depicted by shiva and vishnu devotees (these puranas are written by people who have these qualities)..Therefore Lord Brahma should be worshipped properly as in vedic times but no acharya is advocating more on brahma worship ...Why? ..
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Thank you for visiting TamilBrahmins.com

You seem to have an Ad Blocker on.

We depend on advertising to keep our content free for you. Please consider whitelisting us in your ad blocker so that we can continue to provide the content you have come here to enjoy.

Alternatively, consider upgrading your account to enjoy an ad-free experience along with numerous other benefits. To upgrade your account, please visit the account upgrades page

You can also donate financially if you can. Please Click Here on how you can do that.

I've Disabled AdBlock    No Thanks