Reg a sentence in bold: Since you seem to be an omniscient sorta clairvoyant, kindly explain how and why you think it is a lie.கால பைரவன்;196708 said:Dear Doc, I am disappointed with your equivocation here. Don't you see the temper of the posts of some people? It is a lie when they say they they are against ideology and not against brahmins. The fact is, they do not differentiate at all. There is a specific reason why they keep using casteism and brahminism interchangeably and also add the word brahmin whenever they point to varna or caste system. If a member dares to present contrarian view, they call it shoddy. Tell me, what qualification do these members have to call other member's research shoddy? This is all done to corner the brahmins, impose a guilt-trip on them, and justify whatever discrimination that is being perpetrated against them. Do you want us to sit still and take in all the insults?
Underlined a point. In fact, it is you who does not know to differentiate at all. You assume anything against brahmanism (put precisely, smartism) is against you as a person. Where do you get that identification from?
What is the "discrimination" being perpetrated on 'brahmins'? Reservations? If you think so, its nothing but resentment. Where does it come from? And guilt-trip really?
Casteism is brahmanism; whether you like it or not. History is not going to change; even if hindutva lobby rewrites textbooks as they try to do anyways.