• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Thousands of jobs at risk as Tata Steel seeks British exit

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lalit

Active member
[h=1]Thousands of jobs at risk as Tata Steel seeks British exit[/h]LONDON/MUMBAI | By Kate Holton and Promit Mukherjee

Tata Steel wants to sell Britain's biggest steelmaker, putting thousands of jobs at risk and forcing the government to seek a solution ahead of an EU referendum dominated by concerns about the economy.
After a lengthy board meeting in Mumbai, Tata Steel said it would end its almost decade-long venture in Britain - birthplace of the modern steel industry - and leave the country entirely.
Hit by falling prices, high costs and cheap Chinese competition, Tata said its financial performance in Britain had worsened sharply in recent months and it would exit as soon as it could.
The move could have an impact on Britain's closely fought June 23 vote over whether to stay in the European Union. Britain's anti-EU media have blamed Brussels for preventing London from taking greater steps to protect the industry, although supporters of membership say EU policy is not responsible for the industry's plight.
The British government and the Welsh authorities said they were looking at all options to protect the steel industry, which has already shed thousands of jobs in just the last year.
"We are, and have, and continue to look at all options, and I mean all options," Anna Soubry, a minister for business, told BBC radio, adding that she would not rule out the government buying the plants until a new owner could be found.
Tata employs about 15,000 people in Britain at sites including the giant Port Talbot plant in Wales, which is losing around 1 million pounds a day according to the BBC.
Steelmakers in Britain pay some of the highest energy costs and green taxes in the world, which, along with cheap Chinese steel imports mean it could be hard to find a buyer.
Analysts said Tata would likely struggle to find a buyer for the entire UK division but could try to sell it in parts.
The sale ramps up pressure on Prime Minister David Cameron's right-leaning Conservative government, which has sought to cultivate closer ties with China.
His fate already hangs in the balance over Britain's future in the European Union, and his government has sought to avoid controversies during the run-up to the vote.
However the Conservatives are resented in Britain's industrial heartlands for the demise of mining and manufacturing under former prime minister Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s.
A vital part of the economy through the 19th and 20th centuries, many of Britain's former steel towns have been decimated by the industry's decline since its peak in the 1970s.
Port Talbot still employs about 4,000 people, and Tata is one of the most significant private companies in Wales.
COLLAPSING STEEL
Cameron's government has said it is taking measures to help the steel sector but the fundamental problem remains the collapse in the price of steel, caused by overcapacity in China.
Tata Steel's problems in Britain arose almost as soon as it entered the country, with the acquisition of Anglo-Dutch steelmaker Corus in 2007.
Industry bankers said Tata had overpaid for Corus when it bought at peak market conditions. Despite heavy investment and a move up the value chain, Tata Steel struggled to compete.
Britain imported 826,000 tonnes of Chinese steel in 2015, up from 361,000 two years earlier, according to the International Steel Statistic bureau. EU diplomats say that Britain tends to vote against anti-dumping duties due to its free trade approach.
Tata Steel is the second-largest steel producer in Europe. It has a crude steel production capacity of over 18 million tonnes per annum in Europe, but only 14 million is operational.
Two of its three main European units, Port Talbot and Scunthorpe, are in Britain, with the remaining operations in the Netherlands.
Its share price has halved in the past five years, a period in which it recorded asset impairment of more than $2.88 billion related to the UK business.
British unions welcomed the decision not to shutter the British plants but called on Tata to be a "responsible seller" and on the government to play its role.
"We don't just want more warm words. We want a detailed plan of action to find buyers and build confidence in potential investors in UK steel," Roy Rickhuss, general secretary of steelworkers' trade union Community, said.
The leader of the opposition Labour party, Jeremy Corbyn, called on the government to take a public stake in the industry which he called "the cornerstone of our manufacturing sector".
News of the sale prompted talk amongst industry analysts and bankers of a wider consolidation of the European steel sector.
Tata said it was still in talks with investment firm Greybull Capital over the sale of its British long products unit, which makes steel for use in construction. A source close to Greybull said they were unlikely to be interested in the new assets coming to market however.
($1 = 0.6956 pounds)
(Additional reporting by Paul Sandle, Freya Berry, Clara Denina and Clara Ferreira Marques; editing by Stephen Coates, William Schomberg, Peter Graff and Giles Elgood)


http://in.reuters.com/article/tata-britain-steel/
 
Yet another news-item:

[h=1]Tata's Move Plunges PM Into Industrial Crisis[/h]The firm's announcement it is considering selling its UK operation will renew claims David Cameron has failed to avert the crisis.

The shock announcement that Tata is looking at putting the whole of its UK steel industry up for sale has plunged David Cameron and the Government into a massive industrial crisis.

But besides the plight of 15,000 steelworkers in England, Scotland and Wales, the Tata bombshell also presents the Prime Minister and the Tories with a political crisis too.
First, with elections for the Welsh Assembly just five weeks away, any talk of a Tory revival in Wales on 5 May now looks pretty hollow.
Second, Mr Cameron will be accused of doing nothing to avert the crisis and holidaying in Lanzarote while the fate of thousands of steel jobs were in jeopardy.
Third, opposition parties are already blaming the Business Secretary, Sajid Javid, for failing to go to the Mumbai board meeting to back Port Talbot's plea for survival, as the Aberavon MP Stephen Kinnock did. Instead, Mr Javid is in Australia.
cegrab-20140913-171459-319-1-736x414.jpg
<img src="http://media.skynews.com/media/images/generated/2014/9/13/335669/default/v1/cegrab-20140913-171459-319-1-206x116.jpg" class="image__item video__teaser-image" alt="Port Talbot" />

Play video "Jan: Tata To Cut Over 1,000 Jobs"
new_pause_spinner.svg
new_loading_spinner.svg

00:00/03:01
Advert
Buffering










play-icon.png



skychasky.jpg





Video: Jan: Tata To Cut Over 1,000 Jobs
Fourth, Mr Cameron and senior ministers will be accused of taking their eye off the ball because they are obsessed with fighting the increasingly bitter battle over the EU referendum on 23 June.
Fifth, the collapse of the UK steel industry will be blamed by Leave campaigners on the failure of Brussels to fight back against cheap imports into Europe of Chinese steel.
And sixth, for a Prime Minister who has pre-announced his resignation and is already fretting about his legacy, presiding over the demise of the British steel industry would not look good.
Before the desperate news from Mumbai, ministers insisted the Government was prepared to consider "all manner of options" to ensure steel production continues at Port Talbot.
Could that include at least temporary nationalisation of an industry that was privatised by Margaret Thatcher's government in the late 1980s? That's what opposition leaders are demanding.
But at what cost? Port Talbot alone is losing £1m a day. Chancellor George Osborne would be deeply hostile to any form of re-nationalisation, however temporary, just as he blocked state handouts to Redcar last year.
That won't deter Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who wasted no time in declaring: "I am deeply concerned at the news coming out of Tata's board meeting in Mumbai.
"Ministers must act now to protect the steel industry and the core of manufacturing in Britain.

"It is vital that the Government intervenes to maintain steel production in Port Talbot, both for the workforce and the wider economy, if necessary by taking a public stake in the industry."
Shadow Business Secretary Angela Eagle added: "The Government should be doing everything possible to protect the industry in the short term as it faces this perfect storm.
cegrab-20160125-152258-166-1-736x414.jpg
<img src="http://media.skynews.com/media/images/generated/2016/1/25/443135/default/v1/cegrab-20160125-152258-166-1-206x116.jpg" class="image__item video__teaser-image" alt="The steelworks in Port Talbot" />

Play video "Special: Steel Cuts In Port Talbot"
new_pause_spinner.svg
new_loading_spinner.svg

00:00/11:23
Advert
Buffering










play-icon.png



skychasky.jpg





Video: Special: Steel Cuts In Port Talbot
"But after months of complacency and after a Budget with no strategy for steel, Sajid Javid and his team seem to have gone missing in action at this crucial time.
"The Government needs to do whatever it takes to save this vital strategic industry which is the cornerstone of our manufacturing sector."
Backing the nationalisation calls, Plaid Cymru leaders point out that their nationalist colleagues in Scotland stepped in to bail out two closure-threatened steelworks temporarily before they were eventually sold to private buyers.
With senior ministers out of the front line, it was left to the new Welsh Secretary Alun Cairns to plead the Government's defence of its actions.
"I have spoken with the local MP, I spoke to the First Minister (last week) and the UK Government is working very closely with both Tata and the Welsh Government," he said.
"We are doing everything possible to protect local jobs and preserve the strategic interests of the UK."
Earlier, Business Minister Anna Soubry said: "We are looking at all manner of options that may or may not be available to us as a Government, all options.
"It starts from a base of making sure that we continue to make steel in Port Talbot."
But even if the Government does step in with some form of rescue package, opponents may still claim it is too little, too late, prolonging the industrial - and political - crisis.

http://news.sky.com/story/1669230/tatas-move-plunges-pm-into-industrial-crisis/
 
Chinese dumping of steel is an international issue.

India raised the import barrier to help tata steel and other local players in india.

There needs to be some protectionism to save other countries from chinese over capacities and down turn.

Tat steel was smart enough to pull out fro OK.

However Tata motors took the chinese issue in its stride and jlr jaguar land rover is making a global record in sales ., though in chinese market they had problems.

JLR is a hit and tata motors is doing very well
 
this is one of the biggest fallouts because of admitting china to WTO. dumping of goods everywhere. and destroying local industry.
 
this is one of the biggest fallouts because of admitting china to WTO. dumping of goods everywhere. and destroying local industry.
hi

two sides of coins...one is complaining regarding china...otherside why cant compete china in manufacturing....cheap labor/

available raw material....products are cheaper in the world....its just crying and blaming china....without china's products

many common man can't buy anything in the world....including india.....china is dumping many products in india tooo...

even though china is communist country...its well placed and better than many capitalist country...
 
hi

two sides of coins...one is complaining regarding china...otherside why cant compete china in manufacturing....cheap labor/

available raw material....products are cheaper in the world....its just crying and blaming china....without china's products

many common man can't buy anything in the world....including india.....china is dumping many products in india tooo...

even though china is communist country...its well placed and better than many capitalist country...

If China could do why can’t India? Cut the cost (including corruption) and compete.

In the scenario of globalization, only fittest could survive in completion. Government protectionism even if extended, could not withstand in the long run.
 
hi

two sides of coins...one is complaining regarding china...otherside why cant compete china in manufacturing....cheap labor/

available raw material....products are cheaper in the world....its just crying and blaming china....without china's products

many common man can't buy anything in the world....including india.....china is dumping many products in india tooo...

even though china is communist country...its well placed and better than many capitalist country...

the usa and india have social constraints. both countries live by the law. try to build a road, and see the number of lawsuits, both in india and in the usa.

in china, there is no law. what the technocrats decide today, it is a done deal tomorrow. overnight, they can move millions of folks, eraze centuries old buildings, pay no compensation, introduce internal passports so that peasants from the countryside cannot move to the cities with their families, contract labour at cheap prices brought from the country to the factories at no guaranteed wage, and above all censorship.

with this type of rule, china has sacrificed three generations so far, to build an industrial base. india's strength and the only strong binding bond for us is our democracy. we are a nation of minorities, define it in whatever small way you want. in china the han chinese culture and way of life loom over the whole country. same as in the old ussr, where the russians ruled in the same way. ussr broke up when the russians lost their guts to rule by blood and guts.
 
the usa and india have social constraints. both countries live by the law. try to build a road, and see the number of lawsuits, both in india and in the usa.

in china, there is no law. what the technocrats decide today, it is a done deal tomorrow. overnight, they can move millions of folks, eraze centuries old buildings, pay no compensation, introduce internal passports so that peasants from the countryside cannot move to the cities with their families, contract labour at cheap prices brought from the country to the factories at no guaranteed wage, and above all censorship.

with this type of rule, china has sacrificed three generations so far, to build an industrial base. india's strength and the only strong binding bond for us is our democracy. we are a nation of minorities, define it in whatever small way you want. in china the han chinese culture and way of life loom over the whole country. same as in the old ussr, where the russians ruled in the same way. ussr broke up when the russians lost their guts to rule by blood and guts.
hi

i agreed with u....stilll as red state can dominate the world...i think ..if something happen in the economy in china...whole world cry over

that....why?....becoz so called big country USA...USA FLAGS ARE MANUFACTURED IN CHINA.....there is something wrong

with us...we say always...we are democracy....usa/india are biggest democracies in the world...still some where our

labor rules are wrong.....like britsh east india company did in the last century...china gets raw materials from outside...

things manufacture cheaper...LIKE IPHONES TECHNOLOGY FROM USA....BUT MANUFACTURED IN CHINA....WHY CANT

INDIA CAN DO?.....many questions....but no answers....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top