• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Modi has set right his and India's image abroad

Status
Not open for further replies.
An incisive analysis of Modi's Government by Shri Gurumurthy...A candidf assessment! More positives for sure!

[FONT=&quot]'Modi has set right his and India's image abroad'[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]June 12, 2015

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]‘To see editors calling themselves great intellectuals saying what Rahul Gandhi says, speaks of their credibility’

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]‘You take any measure by Narendra Modi; it is not intended for today’s results; the result will be permanent’

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]‘What Modi has achieved in 365 days in terms of India’s strategic relationship and economic benefits from abroad is unbelievable’

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Swadeshi economist, columnist and chartered accountant S Gurumurthy speaks to Shobha Warrier about one year of Modi Sarkar.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]S[/FONT][FONT=&quot] Gurumurthy[/FONT][FONT=&quot] rarely talks about Prime Minister Narendra Modi or the way he is administering India. In this rare and exclusive interview with Shobha Warrier/Rediff.com, Gurmurthy, image, left, analyses the first year of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in office, how he has turned all the all the negatives to positives, and what he should do to make the economy grow.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Perhaps for the first time in India has a prime minister been scrutinised and dissected so thoroughly after one year in power. Is it because he promised ‘achche din’ during the campaign and so people expected good days to come from the very day of him assuming office?

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]No. The unadmitted truth is that the media hates him and they will always hate him. They were the ones who said this man was a Hitler and had killed 4000 Muslims; they later reduced it to 2000 and now it (the toll) stands at 1000. A shameless media pretending to be neutral targeted him for 12 years. Some of them went to the extent of creating the suspicion that the Godhra tragedy was enacted by Modi to justify killing Muslims! This fraudulent theory was assisted by a United Progressive Alliance-sponsored commission of inquiry which said the tragedy was an accident, not a conspiracy.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]They demonised the man so much and so continuously that the foreign media began echoing the Indian media, and the foreign media xerox copying the demonisation of Modi by Indians became news here as the foreign media too was calling him a demon! It is the foreign-funded NGOs-Indian media alliance, the most deadly and immoral alliance, that started the campaign against Modi and kept targeting him for over a decade.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]You mean the English media?

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]It is the English media that dominates and the language media is only a shadow of the English media, even though it is several times bigger. Opinions are created by the English-speaking elite media and many of them have nothing to do with the real India but these are the people who set the agenda for India and inform the world. No foreign media will quote a language media even though it might command a readership much higher than the English media. The NGO which worked in conspiracy with the Indian media proclaimed that they got the Americans to deny visa to Modi!

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Every prime minister from Jawarharlal Nehru to Indira Gandhi to Rajiv Gandhi to P V Narasimha Rao to A B Vajpayee commanded goodwill in India and outside. In the case of Vajpayee, the media said the Jan Sangh was bad, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh was bad, but Vajpayee was good. But you take the case of Modi, the moment he was proclaimed as the PM candidate of the Bharatiya Janata Party, 60 members of Parliament, including communists, wrote to the president of the USA to be firm on the visa issue. The Economist magazine wrote, ‘we cannot be persuaded to support this man’. See the kind of hatred they had generated then within India which echoed outside.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]And the man comes to power! Can you imagine the deficit he had to cover? Trust deficit and legitimacy deficit of the victorious Modi transformed into national discredit of having elected a leader with such deficits. But in one year, he has completely overturned the situation. Has any newspaper written one word on this?

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]First, the foreign media said he would never have good relations with his neighbours. In one move, by calling all the Saarc leaders for his swearing-in, he demolished it. It was such a brilliant strategy. How many in the media appreciated this? They couldn't tolerate that he has come to power in spite of them.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Now about the kind of scrutiny he had to go through. Modi has been elected for five years, and he was supposed to do certain things in five years. But newspapers are writing editorials asking, tell us what have you done in one year? I can understand an immature person like Rahul Gandhi asking this. But to see editors calling themselves great intellectuals saying what Rahul Gandhi says, speaks of their credibility.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]How do you evaluate his first year? What are the positives?

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]What Modi has achieved in terms of India’s strategic relationship and economic benefits from abroad is something unbelievable in 365 days. He has made America accept our nuclear liability clause. He has made Australia and Canada give 3500 tonnes of uranium. He has not only made China commit to invest $20 billion, but he has told China about setting right the negative trade deficit, implying anti-dumping duties against them. (We have over $ 400 billion in current account deficit). Manmohan Singh, who was virtually crawling before the Chinese president, allowed the nation to run up a trade deficit of $ 375 billion in 10 years. Modi got $ 35 billion investment from Japan and then from EU too. In 365 days, he has turned all the negatives into positive, from (-) 5 to (+) 7. Did any analyst write about the negative scores he had had to overcome in and outside India? They wrote as if he began writing on a clean slate.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The criticism is that he has only got promises for billions of dollars but nothing has come to India…

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]You mean to say they issue a cheque for $20 billion on the first day? It will come only when the projects begin to take off.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Another criticism against him is that he has been travelling all over the world, neglecting the domestic front…

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]I told you that he had unbelievably set right his and the country's image abroad (that was) viciously spoilt by our own media in 365 days. Without that, economic recovery in India too would be difficult in an inter-dependent world, particularly when we have been running a current account deficit and making it up through loans and investments from abroad.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]On the home front, he is building a powerful foundation for the country’s economy. What are the things that have been missing till now? We were not able to reach people in terms of financial inclusion. No foreign economists or the RBI would say the person who has no money should have a bank account. That was the policy till now. Here, our need is, everybody should have a bank account, only then could we put money in his account.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The RBI agreed to have one crore bank accounts in three years. The finance ministry said, three crore bank accounts in one year. But Modi wanted 7 .5 crore bank accounts in five months. Do you know what the latest tally is? 16.5 crore bank accounts. The scaling up of the operation Jan Dhan Yojana is unthinkable.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Next, 10 crore people have been hooked into three insurance schemes. It happened because they had bank accounts, kisan credit cards and other financial inclusion mechanism

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]These are all fundamental things. Rajiv Gandhi had said 85 per cent (of the allocation) gets eaten away on the way. Those days are over. The money will go directly to the person. Nobody can eat it in between. Afterwards, what the beneficiary does with the money, is a different matter.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Take the gold monetisation scheme and the MUDRA refinance scheme -- a remarkably India-specific idea. All these are India-centric ideas which neither the Indian nor the foreign media will write about.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]You take any measure by Narendra Modi; it is not intended for today’s results; the result will be permanent. He is planning a socio-economic structure which will be solid for the country whether Modi is the prime minister or somebody else.


http://www.rediff.com/news/intervie...ight-his-and-indias-image-abroad/20150612.htm
[/FONT]
 
Excellent analysis by Mr Gurumurthy. More such analysis need to get public's attention along with negative analysis that is usually doled out by main stream media.
 
by brajeshwar nath (View MyPage) on Jun 15, 2015 11:34 AM

hang on Mr Gurumurthy.He has not made America accept our civil nuclear liability clause, rather Americans have wriggled out of it and civil nuclear liability will now be covered by a consortium of 4 Indian insurance companies. Get your facts straight.In fact the liability is borne by operator i.e. nuclear power corporation and OEM ( supplier) has no recponsibility on this account. This is the concession sought by USA and was granted by our great govt. Have no illusions on this account. Similarly in case of other countries.. we have bent backwards to appease them.


Mr Gurumurty is a good PRO for Modi,He fogets that what happened to his election promises to the country? Viz- black money,federal structure,autonomy to states (contrary to his speeches the BJP is playing dirty politics in Delhi),state of farmers who are forced to a situation of committing suicide,educational reforms(doing opposite to his promises),price rise,law and order, women status in society, their exploitation ,unemployment of rural and urban youth,taxation policy for common man,etc.Will Gurumoorty respond to these ?

HTML:
Take the gold monetisation scheme and the MUDRA refinance scheme -- a remarkably India-specific idea.

Will it work, show me the proof, how is it different from other slogans like "garibi Hatao" etc.
Please read the article Vaagmi had posted:
http://www.tamilbrahmins.com/showthread.php?t=25192&p=301610#post301610
 
Last edited:
For a change, for the first time, the busybody USA has not opened its mouth or commented on the Myanmar operation by the Indian army. And without any prompting, China has issued a statement on its own that it is not helping insurgents.

Modi has made significant progress on all his election promises, and results will show in due course. There is big list of foreign govt dignitaries who have praised his work.
1. All bjp states have improved, streamlined and corruption free administration.
2. Corruption in govt tendering is totally eliminated. And all tender processes are transparent. Ask any I industrialist. Lobbying is gone.
3. Black money and corruption is accepted as a serious issue, and 37 countries have agreed to act pro actively and share information.
4. All Jan janardhan schemes have exceeded targets, and have become viable, people friendly and no leaks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top