• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

In selecting designer babies - Are we playing God, or is it just science?

Status
Not open for further replies.

prasad1

Active member
The international team led by Dr Dagan Wells of Oxford University showed how "next-generation sequencing" can be used to pick the embryos created by IVF that are most likely to lead to successful pregnancies.
The approach can identify embryos with the correct number of chromosomes and may cut hundreds of pounds off the cost of embryo screening, Wells said.
The majority of embryos produced by IVF aren't able to lead to successful pregnancies, and scientists have sought to find ways of identifying the embryos that should be implanted to give the greatest chance of success.
Having an incorrect number of chromosomes usually prevents embryos from producing a pregnancy. Until recently, such abnormalities have been hard to detect as they do not affect the appearance of embryos under the microscope.
"Many of the embryos produced during infertility treatments have no chance of becoming a baby because they carry lethal genetic abnormalities," Wells, said. "Next-generation sequencing improves our ability to detect these abnormalities and helps us identify the embryos with the best chances of producing a viable pregnancy. Potentially, this should lead to improved IVF success rates and a lower risk of miscarriage," he said.

Deccan_herald.


I believe in life at birth and not at conception, and quality of life is more important than preservation of life. Still sometimes I am conflicted by the advances in science.
 
The title may not be appropriate - the methods used only reflect the obvious, that of survival of a healthy baby with a healthy life.

If we were to allow the question in the title, then would it not apply to other things as well? In fact wherever we let go of what is available/provided by nature, and embrace a "manufactured" sophistication (even things like grinder, fan etc), we would be playing God, perhaps a God of smaller things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top