• This forum contains old posts that have been closed. New threads and replies may not be made here. Please navigate to the relevant forum to create a new thread or post a reply.
  • Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Did Brahmins really caused the division among people? some points to debate....

Status
Not open for further replies.

GANESH65

Active member
Interesting historical facts about Brahmins. Pl read it fully. Muthuraman Krishnamoorthy: Came across this interesting analysis
Brahmins - Victims are penalized!
They say:
1. Indian Brahmins have been oppressing the lower caste population in India
. 2. Brahmins introduced the inhuman "untouchability"
3. Brahmins are cunning, parasitic exploiters and creators of the iniquitous caste system.
4. Indian sub-continent's biggest problem was 5000 years of Brahmin oppression!
5. Brahmins never allowed others to read and write or to learn Sanskrit!
6. Brahmins are arrogant, dis-respective, communal and abusive extremists who whip the dalits (lower caste Hindus) till they die.
7. Brahmins exploited and continue to exploit everyone else.
8. Brahmins authored the Hindu scriptures just to ensure their own highest position in the social hierarchy.

The list is endless! And any educated person believes this as 100% truth. Even those who born in today's Brahmin caste are apologetic about their birth due to these "truths"! However, these 'truth' arguments clearly lack historical validity and logical consistency. It is merely a case of “repeat a lie a hundred times and it will become the truth”. (Joseph Goebbels' theory).
It is amazing to see that how fiction can become truth in course of time! Let's examine truth based on facts and real history.
To start with, there is no SINGLE Brahmin god in Hinduism!
All gods are from backward castes, dalits and tribals.

Brahmins never created the concept of Gods in Hinduism. There was no even SINGLE Brahmin King that ruled India. To be able to oppress others requires positions of power.
The Brahmin’s traditional occupation was that of temple priest (purohit) officiating religious functions. Their sole income was Biksha (alms) given by the land-lords (non-Brahmins).
And another section of Brahmins were teachers, that too without salary. Vedic literature was mostly written by non-Brahmins! The most powerful of the dharma shaastra, that gives Brahmins a high status, is the Manusmriti written by Manu, a non-Brahmin.
Brahmin means a profession (Varna) then, not a caste. If the reading and writing of Sanskrit was confined to Brahmins then how do you have the tribal Valmiki composing Ramayana? Ved Vyas, who classified four vedas and wrote Mahabharata, was born to a fisher-woman. Sanskrit was used mostly by non-Brahmin writers - there are very few scriptures in Sanskrit authored by Brahmins.
We consider the teachings of Ved Vyas, Vashishtha, Valmiki, Krishna, Rama, Agasthya, Vishwamitra, Shrunga, Gowthama, Buddha, Mahavira, Tulsidas, Thiruvalluvar, Kabir, Vivekananda, Gandhi, Narayana guru etc as most valuable.
If none of them were Brahmins why cry so much about Brahmin didn't allow you to learn? There are numerous works on bhakti by non-Brahmin bhakti saints.
Brahmins never prevented others from learning. Brahmins were neither rich nor powerful at any point of time in history. Pick up any old Indian story book, you will see ‘Garib Brahmin’ (Poor Brahmin) quoted as a virtue. (Remember Kuchela-Krishna story?)
Though their profession was considered as highest stature of the society, the Brahmin ascetics' only way of survival was alms given by people.
The biggest contribution of Brahmins is sustaining the best language ever spoken in the earth - Sanskrit. If you learn English or Arab, you have commercial benefits. Nobody ever promoted Sanskrit.
Without any benefits, Brahmins took up voluntary task of learning Sanskrit. Then, now you accuse them of monopoly in Sanskrit!
After reading all this can anyone blame Brahmins for anything !!

Source: received as whatsapp message.
 
Last edited:
Yes Brahmins in earlier times were the custodians of Knowledge. The responsibility of spreading the same was therefore obviously remained with them. How they were held responsibile for all other mess is a question only historians can answer. How usage of Samskritam got discouraged is really a matter of concern. We can even now do something about and cause its wide spread usage with little effort..
 
Brahmins being at one end of the caste spectrum take the blame for all evils of the caste system since they enjoy the exalted status in caste system. It is considered that they

have superior knowledge which is open to misuse by them to subjugate others.It is believed that They had an hidden interest in maintaining the caste status quo and

preserving and upholding it. Others naturally blame them for all the ills whether it is true or not. They feel they had something to do with it.Other intermediate castes

were smart enough to shift all the blame to brahmins in order to get supremacy . They decimated the brahmins with dravidian ideology by labelling brahmins as

aryans.

Brahmins got nailed to the cross more due to their supposed caste superiority and high prosperity and power they enjoyed during british rule.
 
Last edited:
I think the brahmin ideology was vehimently opposed in Kerala and Tamil Nadu than other parts of India. It is these two states which still rich in Brahminical values which is quite contradictory. Seems Brahmin values has drawn strength from opposition!
 
Extremism by a group leads to resistance both covert and overt.

This in turn results in more adherance to certain values to the level of disgust.

Brahmins have not covered themselves with glory following their own path and facing further marginalisation.
 
Last edited:
Brahmins have ceased to be a monolithic entity with only one set of values . There is a huge spectrum -one totally and uincompromisingly brahmins observing all rituals

with rigour and vegetarian to the core and the other totally westernised and carrying brahmin tag alone.There are others in various stages of compromise.Changes iFood

habits, intermixing with other castes thru marriage, choosing unconventional professions or excelling in business are part of the changes.
 
This subject is araichcha, pulichcha maavu and thuvaiththu thuvaiththu kandalana thuni. Please go into the archives.
 
This is for the benefit of new members.

Even old films are getting released again with changes like colouring and fresh prints.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top