• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Couples in India who have premarital sex to be considered 'MARRIED': A Landmark Judge

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lalit

Active member
[h=3]Couples in India who have premarital sex to be considered 'MARRIED': A Landmark Judgement by Madras High Court[/h]
[h=3][FONT=&quot]The couples who lived together as spouses are deemed to be married even though they not legally married - A Landmark Judgement[/FONT][/h][h=3][FONT=&quot][/FONT][/h]
On last Monday The High Court of Madras passed a landmark Judgment by Justice Karnan awarding rights to couples who may not legally married but have lived together in every other way as spouses while ruling on the issue of domestic partnership.

Gems from justice Karnan’s order:

“...if any couple choose to consummate their sexual cravings, then that act becomes a total commitment with adherence to all consequences that may follow, except on certain exceptional considerations… Legal rights applicable to normal wedded couples will also be applicable to couples who have had sexual relationships which are established...”

“...It is not disputed that the petitioner has been a spinster before she gave birth and that the respondent was a bachelor before developing sexual relationship with the petitioner. Both of them led their marital life under the same shelter and begot two children. Therefore, the petitioner’s rank has been elevated as the `wife’ of the respondent and likewise, the respondent’s rank has been elevated as the `husband’ of the petitioner. Therefore, the children born to them are legitimate children and the petitioner is the legitimate wife of the respondent...”

He said that either party to a relationship could approach a family court for a declaration of marital status by supplying documentary proof for a sexual relationship. In this case, the man had officially admitted that the woman was his wife, by signing the ‘live birth report’ of his second child and giving his consent for a Caesarean section for the birth, according to the court. Furthermore, he ordered the ‘husband’ to pay monthly maintenance of Rs 500 to his ‘wife’

But the said judgment not at all ruling that all pre-marital sex by an unmarried couple of legally marriageable age is considered married, and the ‘husband’ in such marriage cannot marry someone else without getting a court decree of divorce from the ‘wife’ as reported in THE HINDU. However the above Judgment elevates the status of the couples as Husband and wife had continuous sexual relationships and lives together as spouses as live in relationship even though they are not legally wedded.

Conclusion:

It is a landmark and progressive judgment benefits and protects women who are always victims of pre marital or non marital sex.

http://law.geekupd8.com/2013/06/Cou...-be-considered-married-Madras-High-Court.html
 
What is the complication in this ? Man & female living to-gether obviously and deliberately as wife & husband, & the pregnancy takes place, they become Husband & wife . there can be legal problem , if only they disown themselves as living to-gether & it can be attributed to Prostitution ? What else ?
Hope our culture may not deteriorate to that extent of denial --- subjecting themselves to defame among their Friends/ if not Relatives ?
A.Srinivasan
 
Court has given the right decision! Welcome this landmark judgment! Hope these are implemented without any religious bias!
 
................
1. He said that either party to a relationship could approach a family court for a declaration of marital status by supplying documentary proof for a sexual relationship. ..........
Documentary proof? Video?? :faint:
 
Common-law marriage, also known as sui juris marriage, informal marriage, marriage by habit and repute, or marriage in fact is a legal framework in a limited number of jurisdictions where a couple is legally considered married, without that couple having formally registered their relation as a civil or religious marriage. The original concept of a "common-law marriage" is a marriage that is considered valid by both partners, but has not been formally recorded with a state or religious registry, or celebrated in a formal religious service. In effect, the act of the couple representing themselves to others as being married, and organizing their relation as if they were married, acts as the evidence that they are married.
The term common-law marriage has wide informal use, often to denote relations which are not legally recognized as common law marriages. The term common-law marriage is often used colloquially or by the media to refer to cohabiting couples, regardless of any rights that these couples may have, which can create public confusion both in regard to the term and in regard to the rights of unmarried partners.

Common law and statutory marriage have the following characteristics in common:

  1. Both parties must freely consent to the marriage
  2. Both parties must be of legal age to contract a marriage or have parental consent to marry
  3. Neither party may be under a disability that prevents him or her from entering into a valid marriage – e.g. they must both be of sound mind, neither of them can be currently married, and some jurisdictions do not permit prisoners to marry.
Otherwise, common law marriage differs from statutory marriage as follows:

  1. There is no marriage license issued by a government and no marriage certificate filed with a government
  2. There is no formal ceremony to solemnize the marriage before witnesses
  3. The parties must hold themselves out to the world as husband and wife (this is not a requirement of statutory marriage)
  4. Most jurisdictions require the parties to be cohabiting at the time the common law marriage is formed. Some require cohabitation to last a certain length of time (e.g. three years) for the marriage to be valid. But cohabitation alone does not create a marriage. The parties must intend their relationship to be, and to be regarded as, a legally valid marriage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage
 



Originally Posted by Lalit
................
1. He said that either party to a relationship could approach a family court for a declaration of marital status bysupplying documentary proof for a sexual relationship. ..........



Documentary proof? Video?? :faint:
............................................................................................................................

Both the statement and question appear to be illogical.

How many people indulge in sex with documentary proof ?

Living together could sometimes may be proved with rental agreements, CCTV in the compass or any other agreement for living together.
 
Last edited:



Originally Posted by Lalit
................
1. He said that either party to a relationship could approach a family court for a declaration of marital status bysupplying documentary proof for a sexual relationship. ..........



Documentary proof? Video?? :faint:
............................................................................................................................

Both the statement and question appear to be illogical.

How many people indulge in sex with documentary proof ?

Living together could sometimes may be proved with rental agreements, CCTV in the compass or any other agreement for living together.
hi

now a days.....phone cameras handy for any proof...
 
I may be naive, how do you do it? Just few pictures together does not prove anything.
You may need lot more evidence in a court of law.
hi

many phones are having video camera too....just like iphones....sometimes videos are recorded....its primary evidence too to

prove in court...
 
In olden days this was referred to as Ghandarva Vivaham. :hug:

If the father disowned the offspring there will be divine intervention :moony:

to uphold the truth - since DNA testing was not discovered then! :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top