• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Christian Michel Named "Mrs Gandhi", "Son Of Italian Lady": Enforcement Directorate


Well-known member
Christian Michel Named "Mrs Gandhi", "Son Of Italian Lady": Enforcement Directorate

Now the mother son duo will have to seek their second bail...Hope the case is taken to the logical conclusion and guilty are punished!!

[h=1]Christian Michel Named "Mrs Gandhi", "Son Of Italian Lady": Enforcement Directorate To Court

[/h][h=2]AgustaWestland Chopper Deal: Christian Michel was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate after he was extradited from the UAE earlier this month and was produced in Delhi's Patiala House Court after seven days in the probe agency's custody.[/h]
December 29, 2018

Christian Michel in AgustaWestland VVIP Chopper Scam: The ED has been given custody for a week

New Delhi: [h=2]Highlights[/h]

  1. Christian Michel arrested in AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam
  2. His reference seen aimed at Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi
  3. Some "big man R" referred to in his communications: Investigators

Christian Michel, the alleged middleman in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper case, has named "Mrs Gandhi" and "the son of the Italian lady" while in custody, the Enforcement Directorate informed a court in Delhi today. Though the investigating agency did not specify the context used by Michel, his reference was seen aimed at Congress leader Sonia Gandhi and her son Rahul Gandhi.
Christian Michel, arrested by the Enforcement Directorate over money laundering charges in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam after he was extradited from the UAE earlier this month, was produced in Delhi's Patiala House Court after seven days in the probe agency's custody.
"We need to decipher who is this 'big man' referred to as 'R' is in the communication between Christian Michel and other people. We need to confront Michel with other people to decipher this," the Enforcement Directorate told the court.
The probe agency said the British national had handed over a piece of paper while shaking hands with his lawyer. When that paper was checked, it had questions related to Sonia Gandhi, the agency added, and wanted the lawyer's access to Michel withdrawn. To which the court replied that the lawyer can meet Michel for 15 minutes in the morning and the evening instead of the usual hour-long meet, but will have to maintain a three-feet distance.
The Enforcement Directorate said it wanted Michel's custody for eight more days, but the court this evening extended the custody by a week.
Michel, 54, is one of the three alleged middlemen being investigated in Rs. 3,600-crore VVIP chopper scam for allegedly organising bribes for Indian politicians and bureaucrats to push for the AgustaWestland deal, involving 12 luxury choppers, during the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government.
In 2014, the government scrapped the contract amid allegations that AgustaWestland, whose parent company Finmeccanica faced charges of bribery in Italy, had paid kickbacks in India.
The CBI has alleged there was an estimated loss of 398.21 million Euros (about Rs. 2,666 crore) in the deal that was signed on February 8, 2010 for the supply of VVIP choppers worth 556.262 million Euros.
The Enforcement Directorate has accused Michel of receiving 30 million Euros (about Rs. 225 crore) from AgustaWestland as kickbacks.
In July, Michel's lawyer had alleged that he was being pressured by Indian agencies to frame Sonia Gandhi in return for amnesty from criminal proceedings.



Active member
Another news agency conveys that the sheet of paper referred to, was left by the ED team, which contained the notes on questions to be asked.
This gains credence as the accused under custody may not have an access to a paper and pen.
which is correct??

Follow Tamil Brahmins on Social Media