Dear Anand, I agree with you,that,hinduism had better form of expressing god through oral tradition of Vedas(2500BC), when compared to art/sculpture, which came only at a later stage after Buddhism. In that context Babylonians, Egyptians(pls correct...Pyramid is not islamic), Greeks etc had much ancient and advanced form of art, than relying on scripture and oral tradition.
Regarding attributing all scientifc inventions to Hinduism, yes I do agree with you..With a great scriptures like Vedas, it easy to tally any inventions we come across... Hope you know, most of the inventers got their inspiration from fictional writers/philosophers etc etc.. But are we giving credit to those fictional writers as inventors.
Again, you rejected my statement of evaluating Lord Ganesha in line with science, and you are told me clear that Science and religion are poles apart.. Again, you took a nose-dive and wanna take credit for all the global scientific inventions, stating that they were all aready found in religion.. Arent you contradicting your own statement..
Anyways, I didnt respond in detail to your previous post, cos, it looks like we are deviating from the core topic...(Critic )...