sravna
Well-known member
Conceptual understanding of the Quantum theory
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
According to Quantum Mechanics reality is quantum in nature whereas Einstein’s theory treats reality as existing in a continuous form. Both have startlingly accurate predictions of some phenomena.
In the famous experiment that led to the hypothesis of dual nature of reality, it was seen that light behaved as both a wave and a particle. The odd behavior exhibited was that, even when the light energy is reduced to one photon, interference pattern was seen and puzzlingly suggesting wave nature. Thus dual nature hypothesis was proposed. But the hypothesis did not give a satisfactory conceptual understanding.
It is our theory that at the level of single photon, we are seeing the smallest particle possible. So photon is at the border of physical reality and a higher reality of time. At such levels of reality, particles equally obey the physical laws and the temporal laws.
We know that space and time are inseparable and exist as one holistic reality. Anything existing in the universe obeys both the laws but at macroscopic levels the effect of temporal laws are not strongly felt.
The reason why scientific theories have constantly been falsified is that we do not yet understand the temporal laws as a separate dicta by themselves but the effects of temporal reality do impact our understanding. Since we do not yet understand such reality we do constant revisions to our theories as some fixes. Thus it is not a seamless explanation of reality. We have now reached a stage where there is contradiction at the fundamental level between two of the most accurate theories.
The effect of the reality of time becomes more pronounced at microscopic levels where the smallest distance possible represents the complete passage to higher reality of time. At the reality smaller than the smallest physical distance, space is transcended and the transcending reality is everywhere in space with constant energy.
But at the space time border, which we hypothesize is the case of a single photon, reality is neither everywhere with constant energy nor is fully measurable. That is, both the physical and the temporal laws are equally obeyed. This reflects as particle being at all places with different energies or in other words the particle exists with different probabilities of being detected at different points in space. This would satisfy fundamentally both the temporal and the physical law in an equal way. The intensity is with respect to time and so the probability happens.
We conclude that any energy exists as quanta. At classical levels the effect of reality of time and so the quantum effects are not marked and physical laws are mostly obeyed. At quantum levels, the effect of the temporal laws become significant and gives seemingly weird results but can in fact be explained in a logical way. The distance between the smallest quanta is the passage completely to the higher reality of time opening the possibility of a reality shift in our understanding of truths.
References
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
According to Quantum Mechanics reality is quantum in nature whereas Einstein’s theory treats reality as existing in a continuous form. Both have startlingly accurate predictions of some phenomena.
In the famous experiment that led to the hypothesis of dual nature of reality, it was seen that light behaved as both a wave and a particle. The odd behavior exhibited was that, even when the light energy is reduced to one photon, interference pattern was seen and puzzlingly suggesting wave nature. Thus dual nature hypothesis was proposed. But the hypothesis did not give a satisfactory conceptual understanding.
It is our theory that at the level of single photon, we are seeing the smallest particle possible. So photon is at the border of physical reality and a higher reality of time. At such levels of reality, particles equally obey the physical laws and the temporal laws.
We know that space and time are inseparable and exist as one holistic reality. Anything existing in the universe obeys both the laws but at macroscopic levels the effect of temporal laws are not strongly felt.
The reason why scientific theories have constantly been falsified is that we do not yet understand the temporal laws as a separate dicta by themselves but the effects of temporal reality do impact our understanding. Since we do not yet understand such reality we do constant revisions to our theories as some fixes. Thus it is not a seamless explanation of reality. We have now reached a stage where there is contradiction at the fundamental level between two of the most accurate theories.
The effect of the reality of time becomes more pronounced at microscopic levels where the smallest distance possible represents the complete passage to higher reality of time. At the reality smaller than the smallest physical distance, space is transcended and the transcending reality is everywhere in space with constant energy.
But at the space time border, which we hypothesize is the case of a single photon, reality is neither everywhere with constant energy nor is fully measurable. That is, both the physical and the temporal laws are equally obeyed. This reflects as particle being at all places with different energies or in other words the particle exists with different probabilities of being detected at different points in space. This would satisfy fundamentally both the temporal and the physical law in an equal way. The intensity is with respect to time and so the probability happens.
We conclude that any energy exists as quanta. At classical levels the effect of reality of time and so the quantum effects are not marked and physical laws are mostly obeyed. At quantum levels, the effect of the temporal laws become significant and gives seemingly weird results but can in fact be explained in a logical way. The distance between the smallest quanta is the passage completely to the higher reality of time opening the possibility of a reality shift in our understanding of truths.
References
- Einstein, A.; Podolsky, B.; Rosen, N. (1935). “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?". Phys. Rev. 47: 777. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777.