• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Karnataka ex-CM Yeddyurappa acquitted in corruption case

Status
Not open for further replies.
V

vgane

0
Now the decks are clear for Yeddi to be the BJP CM candidate of Karnataka!

Karnataka ex-CM Yeddyurappa acquitted in corruption case

October 26, 2016 11:54
24bs1.jpg

Just in: Former Karnataka CM BS Yeddyurappa acquitted in the Bellary mining case. The CBI court acquits all other accused in the case.


Filing its chagesheet in October 2012 before a special court in Bangalore, the CBI had alleged that Yeddyurappa has been accused of misusing his office as the then Chief Minister of Karnataka and had allegedly received Rs 20-crore kickback from the Bellary-based South West Mining Company in a quid pro quo deal for waiving Rs 890 crore due to the State government from the company.

Besides, Yeddyurappa as the prime accused, the probe agency also named two of his sons and son-in-law as accused persons.


Chargesheet was filed against them on different charges including cheating, forgery of documents for the purpose of cheating under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Prevention of Corruption Act and also various charges under the Karnataka Land (Restriction on) Transfer Act.


http://news.rediff.com/commentary/2...ruption-case/20439b9d17fcc6dc6aeaa12c48cea5e6
 
We know all the cases filed against Mr B S Yeddyurappa will not stand legal scrutiny in the Courts of Law. Honorable Court has made significant observations in its order as reported by Times of India, Bangalore, of date.

"Major observations in the order
It is clear that suspicion cannot take the place of legal proof and an offence of conspiracy cannot be deemed to have been established on mere suspicion and surmises or inferences without there being cogent evidence. It has also become clear that there must be a meeting of minds in the doing of illegal act or the doing of illegal act by illegal means. If in furtherance of conspiracy certain persons are induced to do an unlawful act without the knowledge of conspiracy or plot, they cannot be held to be conspirators.
There is no iota of evidence to prove that the companies and the heads of those companies induced the sons and son-in-law of the Yeddyurappa to extend an official favour, and there is no evidence to prove accused 7-13 abetted A1 (Yeddyurappa) to misuse his official position."

Brahmnyan,
Bangalore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

Share this page

Latest posts

Latest ads

Follow us on Social Media

Back
Top