• Welcome to Tamil Brahmins forums.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Free Brahmin Community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

A judgment for women’s rights

Status
Not open for further replies.

prasad1

Active member
[h=2]Economic agency is one of the most enabling elements to release women from oppression, violence and powerlessness.[/h]
A Supreme Court Bench has once again proved that our judiciary can be the torchbearer of progressive attitudes towards women.
In 2013, the Justice J.S. Verma Committee, while responding to the horrific December 16, 2012 gang rape in Delhi, prepared a report that drew from the observations of members of the women’s movement among other sources. The report was heralded as one of the most comprehensive reports not only in India but in the world.
The judgment

The latest evidence of such progressive and informed thinking is a directive given to the Chhattisgarh government by a Bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices A.K. Sikri and A.M. Sapre. The Bench directed the State government to appoint a woman Excise Sub Inspector as Deputy Superintendent of Police after granting her relief in the upper age limit.
Richa Mishra’s name was not included in the list of successful candidates for the post as she had crossed the age limit stipulated for the same. As per the Chhattisgarh Police Executive (Gazetted) Service Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2000, the upper age limit for appointment to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police is 25 years and Ms. Mishra had already crossed that age.
But the judges overruled this proposition by referring to another rule which was quoted by Ms. Mishra in the court: age relaxation as per Rule 8 of the Rules, 2000 which states, “there shall be age relaxation of ten years for women candidates for direct appointment in all posts in the services under the State in addition to the upper age limit prescribed in any service rules or executive instructions”.
The judges said: “It is to encourage women, hitherto known as weaker section, to become working women, by taking up different vocations, including public employment. It would naturally lead to empowerment of women, which is the need of the hour… Empowerment of women… is perceived as equipping them to be economically independent, self-reliant, with positive esteem to enable them to face any situation and they should be able to participate in the development activities.”

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/a-judgment-for-womens-rights/article8237561.ece?homepage=true
 
Women have not only relaxation of age for appoitments,but also have been provided with extraordinarily enhanced and

exclusive facility in availing leave.

From the date of implementation of 6[SUP]th[/SUP] Pay Commission, ie. From 01.01.2006, women employees in Central

Government can avail Child Care Leave.

Child Care Leave (CCL) is granted to women employees for a maximum period of 2 years (i.e., 730 days) during their entire service for taking care of their minor children (up to eighteen years of age).

Minimum period of CCL that could be availed on a single occasion is 15 days.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest ads

Back
Top